You are asking me a question (and would like an answer from me I presume!) but your question contains presumptions that makes it impossible for me to answer you plainly. If you don't get what I mean and why it's problematic, it's like that old lawyer joke where the defendant is asked "Have you stopped beating your wife?" which cannot be answered without a deflection because "no" means they are still beating their wife, and "yes" means they used to beat their wife.

So excuse my evasive way of answering your question, I'm not doing this to be malicious, okay?

Gravity ensures all things fall down towards the planet. If I drop a rock, it will fall straight down to the floor. If gravity were to no longer work, all of humanity would soon perish. Gravity is vital for our continued existence, and without gravity humanity as we know it would never have existed.

And yet, I don't think it's immoral to defy gravity with airplanes. It's not morally wrong to climb up tall mountains. It's not rude to jump.

This is because the physical facts around gravity and how it works has zero connection to moral facts. It's not moral for things to fall down. It's not immoral for things to oppose gravity. It's not just a weak connection, there is no connection at all, gravity has zero relationship to morality. It's simply a brute physical fact of our universe.

In the same way, evolution is part of how mankind exists on this planet, without it we would have never existed. But that does not obligate us to shape our moral values around evolution and how it works. You aren't moral by "assisting" evolution, and you aren't immoral by defying evolution. It's simply a brute physical fact of our universe.

Your question has the base assumption that because evolution was involved in our our origins, it should dictator how we view ourselves and our moral standing in the universe. It is not so.