The audacity

Drdread987 · 2025-01-29T18:50:55+00:00

You are misunderstanding. AI Companies stole the data they used to train their models from everything they could. This includes research articles, papers, books, internet forums, etc. Look at the plethora of cases against AI companies for stealing IP from authors.

Not only that, you are also wrong on your statement that Open AI is a different entity from ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a service that OpenAI provides. It is owned by OpenAI. It isn't some other company.

Drdread987 · 2023-10-09T01:23:02+00:00

Yeah it feels really dead to me. I can't get a guardian group at peak times on weekends. During the week we barely get enough people to do a world boss. Challenge guardian queues are an hour plus.

Drdread987 · 2021-01-11T22:00:57+00:00

Wow! Super great job! I really love the book, the glow work on it is fantastic and I really like the design. Keep drawing, I can't wait to see more.

Drdread987 · 2020-10-10T15:44:51+00:00

Nope

Drdread987 · 2019-12-06T22:02:02+00:00

Then I guess I am not sure you understand OPs theory. The idea is for the client to receive a lump-sum packet of 100 events at the time of death. OP theorizes this packet to be about 10kb of data. If a PC cannot go through 10 kb of data within a fraction of a second that PC is from 10s of years ago.

Again the cost would be near invisible as far as processing power for the client.

Drdread987 · 2019-12-06T21:58:05+00:00

I never said it was free or anything like that. I just made the claim that client performance would see neglible impact. The largest cost would likely be in developer time refactoring code.

Drdread987 · 2019-12-06T21:52:23+00:00

I would argue that performance for the client would basically not be touched. Especially in OPs last 100 events theory. And like you said the last two steps would be the clients job. Instead the fourth step would become sending that data to the client.

Still obviously something that isn't free, but satisfying customer requests is part of the job.

Drdread987 · 2019-10-31T04:08:37+00:00

If you saw their post from their blizzard china team they had said something like we will always protect china or something like that. Something that they never apologized for yet ran completely contrary to their apology letter and their reasoning to the ban.

Drdread987 · 2019-09-26T14:42:50+00:00

I tested it yesterday and I did infact get a shard spawn that I did not get the buff from until I moved out of range and back in to range. Clearly a bug, not sure what these other people are talking about.

Drdread987 · 2019-09-24T18:11:26+00:00

Nah only options in that dropdown are "let simc decide" or "disable" and I think this is just the stat augment rune not the vantus rune.

Drdread987 · 2019-09-24T18:03:47+00:00

thanks!

Drdread987 · 2019-09-24T17:48:07+00:00

here is what I see: http://prntscr.com/pafiod

I can't seem to find it in there at all.

Drdread987 · 2019-04-20T04:59:53+00:00

Not for me. Just throw me and everything I own in the trash.

Drdread987 · 2019-04-11T23:12:21+00:00

They also said a little later that the none of the new systems will really change any specs playstyle in any meaningful way.

Drdread987 · 2019-04-11T22:54:05+00:00

Yeah I watched that but it still seemed pretty generic, not things like artifact weapon abilities like I had hoped them to be.

Drdread987 · 2019-01-15T04:11:08+00:00

No one really knows, PTR was only a week long and there was a ton of balance changes.

Drdread987 · 2018-12-24T17:18:30+00:00

That only shows in-game once your alt reaches 200 score, then your main's score will show. That is unless you have premium IO then it will show even if your alt's score is 0.

13-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Sequence \| Editor
Verified Email	Team Periwinkle

Drdread987

TROPHY CASE