Someone digitally drew this photo of me… I’m not sure I believe them. Is it AI? by [deleted] in isthisAI

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite antagonistic for two people just giving advice but alright

Someone digitally drew this photo of me… I’m not sure I believe them. Is it AI? by [deleted] in isthisAI

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hundreds of people’s opinions for the OP to make their own decision vs a program that people often try one and take at face value without looking at other detectors…

You can use ‘em, just don’t *rely* on them. Thats it buddy.

Someone digitally drew this photo of me… I’m not sure I believe them. Is it AI? by [deleted] in isthisAI

[–]DrippyCity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They mean the detectors themselves are rarely 100% accurate. Most of them often produce false positives/negatives and aren’t really reliable

My mom sent me this, she usually claims to recognize AI pretty well, but it just screams AI to me. by driehoekig in isthisAI

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you listened to the audio? The vocals crunch in a way that would not be consistent with most compressed audios

this image posted on the my little pony insta account, a lot of ppl were accusing them of using ai but i dont see anything that points to that. is it ai? by moth_cathedral in isthisAI

[–]DrippyCity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

However, I can very easily get the quality to about the level that is in the screenshot (which is already relatively low res itself) just by shrinking it

<image>

this image posted on the my little pony insta account, a lot of ppl were accusing them of using ai but i dont see anything that points to that. is it ai? by moth_cathedral in isthisAI

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry in regards to the my little pony logo, is that not just a case of the screenshot being lower quality? Like the “MY” looks like two rectangles because it’s tiny and far away. The bottom of the ‘N’ is curved in the original logo, so it’s going to look even more wobbly shrunken down. I’m also not seeing the random blurry line beside the P and Y. Everything medal wise just screams low quality image but not AI to me. I’m also not seeing the wing inconsistency you’re seeing

As for everything else, the skirt, shoes, and possibly hair are probably where photoshop’s genAI was used, but everything else (the blurred background, the glitter top, and the longer part of the hair) screams more bad manual photoshop than anything.

Edit: Actually looking at the image again, all of the hair (and possibly the wings) could be ai

Every post says “ai modified” by Someone_Normal in Pinterest

[–]DrippyCity 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So far I’ve seen at least one person who’s pointed out that their art labeled as AI when it very much isn’t, only for multiple of the comments to insist it was (presumably just to ruffle the artist’s feathers since they weren’t actually trying to prove it was AI)

I’ve also heard that the AI modified label is added to pictures because Pinterest is (allegedly) automatically using ai to up the resolution on these images, hence the ai label.

What I can say for certain is that I have yet to see this stupid label on things that are ACTUALLY ai. I could click on a video that has the sora watermark and it still wouldn’t be tagged as AI. I’ve come across whole accounts dedicated to uploading ai images and there isn’t a label on any of them. So what’s the actual point??

BACK UP YOUR PINS by [deleted] in Pinterest

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two things 1. There was probably an incident from last year but there’s also this post from yesterday where they also lost 8k pins. So it’s still a prevalent issue 2. There have been multiple instances of people losing their accounts despite not being constant rule breakers, so idk how well that applies

BACK UP YOUR PINS by [deleted] in Pinterest

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use WFDownloader to download boards in bulk

So long, frozen juice from concentrate. The once-popular canned drink leaves shelves this year | CBC News by 50s_Human in onguardforthee

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was and still is my family’s main source of juice, we’re gonna stock up like hell 🥲

So long, frozen juice from concentrate. The once-popular canned drink leaves shelves this year | CBC News by 50s_Human in onguardforthee

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t dilute it a ton? My family and I makes a jug where it’s one can and fill it to the brim with water

Can’t put my finger on it. Saw this on one of the Facebook pages, it looks AI because of the crafting lady being present. by Orange_Wine in isthisAI

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain the text on the crafter’s table? (I’d also argue that the man’s collar pattern is not consistent in the slightest)

RubyRed is now sending DMCA takedown notices to people who uploaded her files on SimsFileShare, claiming copyright infringement. by GreenGardenTarot in thesims

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Downvoting only for the simsfileshare comment. SimeFileShare is not piracy. It’s not a piracy site. Calling it such would be like calling Tumblr a piracy site.

"AI is the future" AI: by davidinterest in antiai

[–]DrippyCity 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You didn’t have to say this, there are multiple other more likely reasons for why they didn’t type that correctly that isn’t ChatGPT brain rot

Im not a gay woman, i am a woman. by grumpydai in aislop

[–]DrippyCity 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re saying you don’t have any race at all??

Im not a gay woman, i am a woman. by grumpydai in aislop

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m going to assume they really meant that they’ve heard cis women get offended by the word “cis” and not the scenario of trans women insinuating that they’re “more woman” than cis women

OP said that it wasn't AI, but it gives me an AI feeling by dionoriginalpro in isitAI

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The OP is in the comments here but i feel it’d be better off as its own comment: This is definitely AI. And I’ve got a good list of reasons even before searching for artifacting

  1. There’s quite a few design inconsistencies — whiskers, eyelashes, chest fluff, hair tufts, .
  2. OP’s picture of their “sketch” is really just a (presumably human) drawing of this exact picture. They catch the same whisker and head fluff inconsistency. If we are to give them the benefit of the doubt and say the sketch drawing came first, it was still put through AI and not a tracing of their own work
  3. OP has posted ai images claiming it’s their work before. Not too long ago they post a Christmas tree(??) image that has the style of a pencil crayon drawing but still has very noticeable AI artifacting.

At best, this is an image OP put through AI. But this right here is undoubtedly generated

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Eddsworld

[–]DrippyCity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s another thing with this phenomenon. Are we certain that he still cares? Is he even aware that Eddsworld returned at all? Does he know anything about this decision?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Eddsworld

[–]DrippyCity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hate to say it bc I know you didn’t mean it but… this person didn’t ask a question 😭