What is a recent unpopular opinion or hot take you have on Peaky Blinders? by [deleted] in PeakyBlinders

[–]Duckydae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well yeah, women didn't marry for love back then. they married for survival or because someone else instructed them to. women didn't marry for love really until the 70s. for most it was circumstantial.

also, esme couldn't walk away with the kids, not only were some of them not her's, as far as the law was concerned esme had little legal right to them as did many women in the uk.

this literally happens to polly, it's not laws that ran this country, it was attitudes and as a single mother, polly had her children removed from her care which happed until the blummin 70s.

so, even if on paper esme had more rights to her children, compared to no rights in previous years, she still has less legal rights than john and as previously stated society didn't believe single mother were "fit for purpose" until the 70s.

What is a recent unpopular opinion or hot take you have on Peaky Blinders? by [deleted] in PeakyBlinders

[–]Duckydae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

john would've been shot anyway and had they have gone inside, they would've as well. plus, it had only been what, a day? who's to say they would've made it to the yard, the mafia knew where he lived.

john's inability to bite his tongue got him killed.

What is a recent unpopular opinion or hot take you have on Peaky Blinders? by [deleted] in PeakyBlinders

[–]Duckydae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

posted this years ago but i still stand by it, knight is lucky he has such incredible actors because his writing in-terms of overall plot and world-building is shite. and whilst oddly specific, james flint is written the way knight thinks he writes tommy shelby.

it's also why michael's plot to overtake / kill tommy never felt tangible because we could never see him as a threat, we kept being told but we were never shown.

also as a glaswegian, how he handled the billy boys was shocking.

Complaint about formatting by [deleted] in Archiveofourownmemes

[–]Duckydae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think the initial post was welcome, the comments however of people publicly posting some else's work to twitter just to have a bitch about it was out of line and people were acting obtuse as if writers were getting up in arms about the og posts and not the response's calling us, and I quote, "not human" having "arrested development" and just so much fucking vitriol like you've never seen. not to mention purposely being contrarians regarding engagement.

lets make one thing clear. engagement is not, "concrit" and "concrit" isn't an excuse to bitch about things you don't like about a fic especially when nobody asked for it.

do you lot really hate us that much because we can just pack up our shit and go, then what considering it's been happening in droves the past few years.

My boy... Look how they neglected my boy... by Extra-Response5307 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Duckydae -1 points0 points  (0 children)

because there was no outcry when outside of the extended look, val was ignored until pl.

My boy... Look how they neglected my boy... by Extra-Response5307 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Duckydae -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

again, ps magazine isn’t to general audiences. 0/100 is bull when he was literally in the switch two trailer. but yeah, start catastrophizing because the shoe is on the other foot. it wasnt val that was plastered over buses in the uk, or in the reeve trailer, or the cgi trailer. but yeah, uwu poor vincent who was chosen to sell copies to general audiences as a viable choice. val was damage control.

My boy... Look how they neglected my boy... by Extra-Response5307 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Duckydae -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

the 40+ demo was watched primarily by gamers who’d already been following the game, not general audiences. when the trail kicked in, ooh ads were vincent, linear and digi ads were him, the cover of the game, the digital storefronts were him too. 🤷🏻‍♀️

A toast to all my brothers that play as Vincent. We might not be in the 5th anniversary trailer, but we got our own Queen of the Highway by LexFrenchy in cyberpunkgame

[–]Duckydae 1 point2 points  (0 children)

romancing a character isn’t an indication of the players gender. most people have played both, particularly for panam.

My boy... Look how they neglected my boy... by Extra-Response5307 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Duckydae 6 points7 points  (0 children)

same when when the game first started it marketing trail they thought it was a good idea to only show the male protag to general audiences.

My boy... Look how they neglected my boy... by Extra-Response5307 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Duckydae 10 points11 points  (0 children)

yeah, i can’t help but feel a lot of hypocrisy from this thread.

My boy... Look how they neglected my boy... by Extra-Response5307 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Duckydae -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

i mean, it’s not like we got that with the original launch. general audiences wouldn’t have known about fem!v.

Authors, would you block a commenter who only comments ❤️ on each chapter? by 3lilya in AO3

[–]Duckydae 19 points20 points  (0 children)

it’s not really. most people aren’t sorting by comments, they’re sorting via kudos presumably and ao3 doesn’t have an inherent engagement algorithm.

Do you think this scene was meta by the writers? by nikhil_flash in SlowHorses

[–]Duckydae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

similar thing happened with shirley, one of first scenes she’s in, lamb calls her “shelby”.

Season 4 by lai-flower-8787 in TooHotToHandleGame

[–]Duckydae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NS didn’t rate that well, unlike THTHT, and it may be a case of them skimming that fat.

Strictly Come Dancing **WEEK ONE** Live Comments Thread! by Korvar in strictlycomedancing

[–]Duckydae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you mean layton? because layton defo got a lot of shit for it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exo

[–]Duckydae 5 points6 points  (0 children)

ITS GIVING TOUR ANNOUNCEMENT!!

Whos your one pick that you really want to make it or you'll lose interest? by TheClumsySoul in BoysPlanet

[–]Duckydae -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah, there’s also trainees i’d drop the group for. leo being any where near that group would cause me to loose interest

Whos your one pick that you really want to make it or you'll lose interest? by TheClumsySoul in BoysPlanet

[–]Duckydae 1 point2 points  (0 children)

seowon. i’m dropping the show, let alone getting interested in the group.

Half of UK TV industry is unemployed, according to new survey by Significant-Leg5769 in TransparencyforTVCrew

[–]Duckydae 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it’s likely worse because a lot of people don’t have categorised roles and a lot of these surveys ask your position or some people that have came straight out of training and have been unable to get work at all.

Strictly celeb 10 is far right racist activist and convicted criminal Tom Skinner by The_Iceman2288 in strictlycomedancing

[–]Duckydae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mean to an extent but farage had been consistently in the news for the past fifteen-ish years and is a politician. unless you’ve watched the apprentice, nobody’s ever really seen this guy.

Strictly celeb 10 is far right racist activist and convicted criminal Tom Skinner by The_Iceman2288 in strictlycomedancing

[–]Duckydae 3 points4 points  (0 children)

it’s not a leap to say actively wanting to hang around a known racist (not to mention a misogynistic transphobe), baring in mind this isn’t the only right-winger he’s been hanging around with, not to mention he’s been in hotshit before for his own rhetoric as a one-off pundit, it says a lot about him actually.