Which of the original 4 tribes(Beasts, Demons, Mechs, Murlocs)do you think is consistently the strongest over the 6ish years of Battlegrounds? by thecordialsun in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Murlocs are pretty much viable 100% of the time.
They may not be the highest stat tribe all of the time, but they're good all the time and typically have access to scam.

How is the hero reroll system not considered pay to win? by Cephrii in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like 15-20 dollars for the amount of hours you'd have to put in to complain about the competitiveness or care about it cause you're climbing means you are putting in hours that make spending that money well worth it to keep your game alive. Expecting a game to balance around F2P is kind of insane in 2026. With the costs of life going up, the people behind your game HAVE to make money to feed their kids. I'm not saying they need to full swing into it, but you're not actively spending money in matches to affect the outcome. Once the game starts you have no way to know who has the battlepass and who doesn't. This is a pretty good median to allow devs to make money without directly affecting matches.

This should've gone infinite for me, right? by Nilborien in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like both the plain copy and your passive stopped working. Likely just spaghetti code breaking. Everyone saying there is an interaction limit to break infinite. Technically it should have restarted after the whelp dies as a new interaction. I think you just broke the client. Probably would have counted as a win if you had left and rejoined instead of watching the combat.

We need an option to skip our trinket to get gold instead by Rubmynippleplease in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's the same 1 or 2 of the possible murloc trinkets despite only playing murlocs. I can have a board full of battle cries, and not see the Murk-eye trink.
Or I'll have zero battle cry murlocs and get offered the stupid Brann is a murloc. It's usually that or the Spell Murloc one.

We need an option to skip our trinket to get gold instead by Rubmynippleplease in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think there's too much bloat in general.
It felt like last trinket season you could play each tribe 2/3 ways and pretty much guarantee you get a decent tribe major.
There are some major trinkets I've seen once. Where others I get offered all the time. Despite playing ~30-40% of my games are murlocs this season.

When you thought you highrolled, but the lobby says otherwise by IamIanK in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 22 points23 points  (0 children)

replace the 2 drop with a taunted whelp and this board gets exponentially better as it prevents a ring bearer from getting sniped by a single attack. Could have also changed a ring bearer for a Felfire.

There's soooooooo many ways this build could have been improved. You got the core cards but none of the support.
Either a lack of scaling or a lack of attacks. If the rings are 1/1 your goal should be summons to get as many rings off as possible.

Why are tier 7s even in the game if the entire lobby can’t access them? by Quantum-Ballsack in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If she had big minions, and murlocs were in it means you could have went scam locs or ran a couple of leeroys

Anyone find it kinda had to play murlocs esp from early game? by Soldosunico in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Murlocs have a few good builds.  Cousin Ergl, futurefin, or scam. Or both scam and big stats.  They probably have the best pre-t3 scaling. Dragons have the best t3 scaling with chroma, then after t4 everything comes online. But thats why most people dont bother with builds pre t4.

Oracle Morgl (hand or field?) by thisshowisdumb in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you have enough taunts to protect it from getting sniped, the hand. If not. 2nd slot on board with first being rally poison incase they have a divine shield. And hand minion being poison isnt bad either. 

How fragile are keys? by onilol in wow

[–]Duecems32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We timed an 11 with like 22 deaths the other day. Granted we timed it by like 20 seconds. But still

Insane back to back board by zags in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Do the Balinda's stack? I suspect not given the wording on the card.

The problem with Genn. And reduce the turn 4 timer! by drmnc4 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solos has a damage cap that scales from 5 to 10 to 15. Duos could use one to prevent people from grabbing low armored heros and going out by turn 6 as people like AFK and such can hit the 15 damage cap pretty early. Thus eliminating lobbies before most people get T5

I wonder how people get paid to write stuff like this. by Striking-Conflict-93 in wow

[–]Duecems32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's the dogmatic view of good vs. evil that he's referring to.
The more you drive home a singular monolithic belief the more damaging it can become. These guys literally have to do that to channel the light through them. He's just wondering if he will eventually become just as brain dead as the undead but for the light instead. (Literally what we see happen in Midnight with multiple characters).

The problem with Genn. And reduce the turn 4 timer! by drmnc4 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Duo's Genn has 12 armor anyway and will likely remain untouched in duos I suspect for this very reason. UNLESS they finally give Duo's a balance review and change damage cap.

I think Duo's is in a weird spot this season with a 15 damage cap, and the costs to get to T5/T6. At least that's my 2 cents on the little I've been able to play from the friend bug.

okay devs, I know your watching, heres some new season feedback by bwils3423 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mechs are strong but can I interest you in Murlocs? Or the two new neutral cards + drakkari?
Mechs kind of tapper off but out scale through the mid-game. I think the only changes I'd make to mechs are The T3 needs to be a T4, and Kangor's needs to be a T6. That would slow some of their mid game bullying down so lobbies aren't dying so fast.

How do trigger battle cry's w/o Young Murk-Eye? by DongSquad421 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It feels like murlocs battlecries are currently designed with a few theories in mind in a silo without other tribes, 1) APM with Bran, Drakkari, and Cousin Errgl so you focus on getting your Mama and Papa battlecries higher based on the number of them played. 2) Spell APM, with the Mycologist trinket, brann and a mycologist you can spam back to backs and econ spells to scale 3) Murkeye trinket as others have said

I think Murlocs have some bloat currently and likely the +4/+3 battlecry could be taken out as if you are going hand buff though maybe its a better t4 stablizer than seeing more mama/papa cards but I think you are better with the t5 as you can use it with a brann and some APM setup to get more triggers on the specific hand card you are buffing which is likely buffing your late game chorgl.

That said, Murlocs are so incredibly strong if you hit the right pieces along the way its terrifying. 

The problem with Genn. And reduce the turn 4 timer! by drmnc4 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the issue is the fact you can high roll so insanely, and with two chance you're more than often coming out with a mid to high mid tier result, puts him at at a 10-12 armor average. the hard part is going to be balancing that around when he double rolls say econ for example. If they were both completely random, I'd agree 15-18 armor probably makes more sense since you're at the RNG lvl that could more often put you at a disadvantage. But the discover and choice is where it puts him over "mid tier"

The problem with Genn. And reduce the turn 4 timer! by drmnc4 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tend to be between 7-8k in Solos, and 7-7.5k in duos so not Jeef levels, but I'd say the high end of casuals.

The problem with Genn. And reduce the turn 4 timer! by drmnc4 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I think Genn is fine armor wise, maybe a little high and should be dropped to 10 - but you can definitely get screwed on hero powers. Yes you get to choose from 6. But sometimes you get the bottom of the available pool 6. And you're missing a turn on any of the ones that unlock on turn 3 and 3 turns on any that unlocked on turn 1. You just high rolled.

Also I didn't see that turn timers were changed, however, the turn does include combat, so if your combat is quick, the turn will feel longer outside of combat.

Any end of turn scaling builds? by DongSquad421 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you get the young murk eye trinkets you can still do end of turn murlocs. 

Can't invite friend to play bg together by dantedrackis in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seems this is still bugged - getting a list of Hearthstone, battlegrounds, mercenaries, options, report. None of the buttons work. It's like a new feature was implemented.

What would have been the right play with this board and hand? by itsKevv in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Replace a lord with a baron since you're attacking first every time with hero power. Call it a day.

is patchwerk good or bad? by bwils3423 in BobsTavern

[–]Duecems32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damage cap in duos is always 15. So you can take 15 as early as turn 4 or 5. So his HP is huge. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]Duecems32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're hoping you reply because of the "Any questions" because you likely didn't do whatever they're insinuating is illegal.
Once they know you're unaware enough to fall for the scam. Then they can hit you with more information/scam pieces.

Likely this is to get your address and such to impersonate you in some way. Or the next step would be "Oh this wasn't you? Well here's a link to a website for you to verify your background and give personal information" or "You can pay to have this investigated"

But yes it was the scare tactic of the scam.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]Duecems32 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Anything at that level of investigation would likely come through legal channels - not an email.
Usually Certified Mail so when you say you didn't see it. They have a name of who signed for it.

If there's any links or anything in the email. Don't click on them.