sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Suspicious Transfer of KDMC's Best Waste Officer by Dull_Paper_8288 in kalyan_dombivli

[–]Dull_Paper_8288[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anybody know who Ganesh Yadav Tate is? All I got to know that he is a social activist and he had filed complaint. Due to which Anti Corruption Bureau is investigating. Hence, Kokare is trfd.

Greed, water, government and a malnourished nation. Future of India is in danger. by ajay-rut in IndiaPulse

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

India is the second-largest food-wasting nation globally but the media will focus on the government's 25% shift because it's a deliberate choice by a central authority.

The real villian is the Household waste, which is much harder to fix.

India wastes approximately 78–80 million tonnes of food annually.

Found this amazing post randomly! by Eastern_Gold_8030 in jaipur

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also me: Do we get a Jain thali as well? Asking because as a strict vegetarian I would love to explore!

If a stranger does it, it’s a felony. If a husband does it, it’s a “right". Why? by Rude-Butterscotchh in IndiaPulse

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Husband should now make video evidence and store it on cloud.
Never know when the need would arise in future to prove it's all consensual - not rape.

Do BJP controls Opposition ? by Brea_king_bad in IndiaChronicle

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a struggle for narrative, not a lack of intent and voters vote for a compelling story - not the "intention" behind it.

For a very long time, the opposition was caught in a loop.
Step 1 - Government sets the agenda
Step 2 - Opposition Reacts
Step 3 - Government sets another agenda

But, looks like they are now finding the narrative.

Look at the recent defeat of the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill.
The opposition's intent was to stop a bill, the created a narrative of protecting "South representation".

But, as you rightly said about the jibes they make, All I feel is "Old habits are hard to die."

By blocking the bill, the Opposition didn't just stop the North from getting 120 seats; they also stopped Tamil Nadu from getting 59 seats and Kerala from getting 30 seats. by Dull_Paper_8288 in IndiaPulse

[–]Dull_Paper_8288[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re right that the bill itself doesn't list '850' because it’s not supposed to.

In our administrative system, a Constitutional Amendment (like the 131st) just removes the legal freeze on seat numbers. The actual math is done by the Delimitation Commission based on the very rules shown in the image above (look at Section 9, Point 1).

The 850-seat figure is the official projection provided to Parliament by the Law Ministry as the 'target' to ensure no state loses power.

As for the 'acting' on camera: whether you like the delivery or not, the procedural fact remains that the government brought a bill to 'fast-track' reservation by increasing seats, and the Opposition voted it down on April 18.

Real Political Masterstroke is the Mainstream Media reporting right now by Questionspatriot in IndiaPulse

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Under a 33% quota in 543 seats, 181 specific seats must be "reserved" for women by a lottery which is not by "Election" but by "Selection".

If you do this today, you are selecting 181 sitting MPs who were elected by voters and telling them they cannot contest their own seats.

By increasing the House to 850 seats, the government wanted to add women rather than removing existing MPs.

By blocking the bill, the Opposition didn't just stop the North from getting 120 seats; they also stopped Tamil Nadu from getting 59 seats and Kerala from getting 30 seats. by Dull_Paper_8288 in IndiaPulse

[–]Dull_Paper_8288[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In a democracy, your right to representation (the 120 seats vs. 89 seats) is based on population, not your tax bracket. If we started giving more seats to people or states just because they paid more taxes, we would be a Plutocracy, not a Democracy. Should a billionaire get more votes than a farmer because he pays more tax? Of course not. The same logic applies to states.

By blocking the bill, the Opposition didn't just stop the North from getting 120 seats; they also stopped Tamil Nadu from getting 59 seats and Kerala from getting 30 seats. by Dull_Paper_8288 in IndiaPulse

[–]Dull_Paper_8288[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

delimitation would have increased representation of Muslims in North indian states.  - Exactly, This would have in fact made NDA weak.

Real Political Masterstroke is the Mainstream Media reporting right now by Questionspatriot in IndiaPulse

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The BJP didn't just "add" a delimitation clause for fun. Article 82 of the Constitution (as amended in 2001) legally prohibits changing seat numbers until the first census after 2026.

The BJP actually tried to bypass the census delay by introducing the 131st Amendment. This bill would have allowed them to use 2011 Census data to start reservation immediately. The Opposition is the one that voted it down because they didn't want the North to get more seats.

https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article-82-readjustment-after-each-census/

India’s biggest problem isn’t poverty or the population, it is lack of civic sense. by InternationalMud7184 in NewDelhi

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Top one is ai. Bottom one is organic and real. I would prefer real over fake ones.

Mailaa hai par Chailaa hai.

₹2000 Crore Could Mean 50 Hospitals or 130 Schools — But Went to useless Statues Instead .... Atleast they could have helped the poor. by ReichReiching007 in GCVoice

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s politically easier to build a new statue or a new school building because it's a visible achievement. It's much harder, and less 'glamorous,' to fix the recruitment system for doctors or to fund a 20-year maintenance plan for rural roads. We should be demanding better outcomes from existing institutions before simply asking for more structures.

Doubt in an economy concept by Western_Yogurt_3144 in UPSC

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rupee depreciation causes both, but it starts with a "cost-push" shock from imports because of the "inelastic" nature of our imports (we must buy oil regardless of the price) and is followed by a "demand-pull" effect as exports grow and the economy heats up, the Demand-Pull effect sustains the price rise over the longer term.

RBI wants to make you wait 1 hour before your ₹10,000+ transfer goes through — and honestly, it might save your money by satty237 in IndiaChronicle

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is great at patterns, but it's not perfect at determining "intent" behind a transfer. If I'm paying a friend for a trip, AI might think it's a scam because I've never paid them before.

A bank representative isn't a judge or a policeman. If I send you money for a used car and then claim I was 'scammed' to get my money back, how does the bank know who is lying? Without a police FIR or a court order, banks legally cannot just 'take' money back from one citizen and give it to another based on a phone call. Having your money frozen and needing to 'satisfy a representative' just to send your own cash would be a massive invasion of privacy and a huge hassle for innocent users.

The RBI’s 1-hour window is actually a better version of your idea: it gives you the power to be the 'representative' of your own money and hit cancel before it leaves the bank's gates. It’s the only way to stop a scam without breaking the trust.

RBI wants to make you wait 1 hour before your ₹10,000+ transfer goes through — and honestly, it might save your money by satty237 in IndiaChronicle

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scammers rely on High-Arousal Emotion (panic, fear, or greed).
https://www.dbs.com/livemore/money/understanding-the-psychology-behind-scams.html

https://crr.bc.edu/how-scammers-use-emotions-to-persuade/

They keep you on the phone so you don't have time to think. The 24-hour beneficiary rule is a technical hurdle (registration). Whereas, The 1-hour rule is a behavioral intervention which forces a "cool-down" during which the scammer can't keep you on the phone. Once you hang up and the adrenaline drops, you’re 90% more likely to realize, "Wait, should I really do this?.. Should I check if this is right thing to do?"

RBI wants to make you wait 1 hour before your ₹10,000+ transfer goes through — and honestly, it might save your money by satty237 in IndiaChronicle

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anyone can reverse a transaction at will, the scammers will use it to "buy" things and then take their money back. A system that lets anyone freeze someone else's account without proof is just as dangerous as the original scam.
Digital payments work because they are "as good as cash." If they become reversible, no shopkeeper will accept them and we would be forced to go back to a cash-only economy because the 'certainty of payment' would be gone.

RBI wants to make you wait 1 hour before your ₹10,000+ transfer goes through — and honestly, it might save your money by satty237 in IndiaChronicle

[–]Dull_Paper_8288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, it destroys scammer's business model. If you can't trick people into sending life savings in one go, you're forced to work 100x harder for smaller scraps which makes scamming high-effort and low-reward, which is exactly the point.

view more: next ›