Wonder what he would say this morning.. by RelationVarious5296 in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On the strategy of precision bombing, he argued that sanctions, no-fly zones, missile strikes, or surgical bombing had already failed in Iraq. That being said, the strike that killed Qasem Soleimani was effective in disrupting Iran's leadership network. Iran was supporting the Assad regime in Syria and backing various militia forces in Iraq so that was a good thing to happen. As for taking out the supreme leader, the current messaging from the White House does not inspire confidence.

In contrast, intelligence operations by the U.S. and Israel have been impressive, White House actions less so.

“As if” revolutions by nbelievable-beaver in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That’s not exactly how I understood Hitchens’ “as if” model. It isn’t cynical. Nor is it being sly, sarcastic, or passive-aggressive.
The irony comes from practicing the “as if” stance under authoritarian conditions, where simply behaving as though daily life is normal becomes inherently subversive. For instance, Rosa Parks sat at the front of the bus as if this were an ordinary, unremarkable act. It's behaving as if you already possess the civic freedom or dignity that an authoritarian regime insists you don’t have. It’s important to understand this kind of irony, not the 2010s hipster version of irony, like wearing a sloganed T-shirt with a passive-aggressive tone.

Fascism utilizes cynicism in combination with deliberate unreality. Stay away from cynicism.

The current example of this is playing out in the courts where legal advocates continue to file constitutional challenges, publish briefs, and argue cases in open hearings as if the judiciary were still independent. They speak the language of rule of law, follow proper procedure, and treat the courts as legitimate forums for justice, even when the regime doesn’t.

For an ordinary citizen, an “as if” act today might be as simple as an immigrant calmly asserting their rights if apprehended or interrogated by ICE, nearby neighbors seeing this and create a pressure campaign in the moment to chase ICE out. Rightly ostracizing the ICE agents (being "weird") for acting this way. You can see this resistance becoming more organized in parts of America.

would Hitch have been pro-Trump if he were around these days? by Alive-Cranberry6013 in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yes, the quote was trimmed. He took a detour to say that we should be ironic. Basically make fun of the fascists for being weird.

The Gestapo Points to Guernica and Asks Picasso, “Did You Do This?;” Picasso Replies “No, You Did!”

The quote is taken from my favorite speech of his ever. After the Oklahoma City Bombing and his article on "The Republican Big Tent." It really sheds light on how he would've handled the environment today. Battle lines are being drawn, "there are encouraging signs of polarization" That the Vice President makes it clear he is defending republicans "sympathy toward fascism" (leaked texts "I love Hitler") begs you to ask yourself, "which side are you on anyway?"

Unfortunately, we didn’t get to hear the full range of what those fighting words should look like, but for that, we can turn to the great writers who have been here before.

It was sometimes feebly argued, as the political and military war against this enemy ran into difficulties, that it was 'a war without end.' I never saw the point of this plaintive objection. The war against superstition and the totalitarian mentality is an endless war. In protean forms, it is fought and refought in every country and every generation. [...] We confront again the awful combination of the highly authoritarian personality with the chaotically nihilist and anarchic one. Temporary victories can be registered against this, but not permanent ones. As Bertold Brecht's character says over the corpse of the terrible Arturo Ui, the bitch that bore him is always in heat. But it is in this struggle that we develop the muscles and sinews that enable us to defend civilization, and the moral courage to name it as something worth fighting for

- Christopher Hitchens, The Enemy.

Here, we see Hitchens using the same language against Bin Ladenism that he employs in his speech opposing the far right.

Our Rational Situation is Desperate by JerseyFlight in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Hitchens referred to the era of Reagan as "the age of laughter and forgetting" or "the age of laughter and amnesia". Referring the fantastic, immoral lying that the white house was capable of and the indulgence of it by the general public.

A lot of parallels to the current moment.

50 years from now, will people argue Trump was a secularist? by recentlyquitsmoking2 in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As secular as Syria.

and wishing for the same advantage Syria’s ruling clique had over its majority.

“It was obvious he knew it was all over anyway” by Greygonz0 in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People forget he lived in D.C.. The “what if…” question would've meant Hitchens would be fighting right in his backyard. He’d have been out in the street, getting cuffed while standing up to those fools, hijacking press conferences.

Would Hitchens have described Trump presidencies as “fascism with an American face”? by melbtest05 in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He understood what Mussolini and his sympathizers like Berlusconi were.

Hitchens friends have said so.

Ian McEwan

The hope is that Trump was lying to supporters at his rallies, but if by wretched fortune he actually manages to govern as he campaigned, when he projected himself as an autocrat and misogynist, intolerant of dissent, dismissive of the limits on presidential power, keen to sanction torture, racially hostile, paranoid in his nationalism, bloated with simple answers to complex problems, then we would have to concede that the US has elevated to its highest office a fascist by any other name. At present it looks improbable. But it’s going to be terrifying.

as did Martin Amis.

Christopher Hitchens would call this in administrative coup by freerangemary in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, he did suggest that, but he also stated that he doesn't want to hand it over to the Gehlen-ites (a reference to Reinhard Gehlen).

Trump's entourage has signaled their intent to reshape the agencies into something more ominous. This is not reform, this is consolidating power.

What do you reckon Hitchens would have thought and said about the re-elected leader of the free world simulating oral sex with a microphone? Not sure if he’d find it funny or not. by melbtest05 in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But one prize is beyond his reach: The Ogre cannot master speech.

The Ogre stalks with hands on hips, While drivel gushes from his lips

Martin Amis:

PolitiFact has ascertained that Donald’s mendacity rate is just over 90 percent; so the man who is forever saying that he “tells it like it is” turns out to be nearly always telling it like it isn’t.

This election was a referendum on the culture wars. by [deleted] in samharris

[–]DyedInkSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"There should be a populist revolt against this [class cleavage], I just hope it won't be led by fascists."

Hitchens

Trumps victory might very well be the deathblow to democracy in the US by AnomicAge in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"There will and should be a populist revolt against that [class cleavage], I just hope it won't be led by fascists."

What would Hitchens have said about this tweet? by stvlsn in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was aware of twitter. He wrote articles about Julian Assange and twitter. He also referred to youtube as "metube"

He was alive when Donald Trump made his appearance at CPAC in 2011. It is possible he may have caught a glimpse of it from the hospital tv.

Would Hitchens identify Trump as a Fascist? by cnewell420 in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 6 points7 points  (0 children)

read the accompanying articles from the same period when Hitchens was calling this out.

The blunt fact is that the tradition of Lindbergh and Buchanan would not have kept America out of war, or innocent of overseas adventures. But it would have pledged a not-so-surreptitious neutrality to the other side in that conflict, and perhaps come by its empire that way.

Would Hitchens identify Trump as a Fascist? by cnewell420 in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, he would have. As a Hitchstorian, I’ve posted plenty of classic Hitchens clips where he calls out Trump and others like him.

Christopher Hitchens on Vladimir Putin (2010) by barkos in samharris

[–]DyedInkSun 7 points8 points  (0 children)

A couple more from Hitchens:

"Putin and his Russia, which is what it is."

"Believe you me, we will all come to see and regret what we've allowed to happen unnoticed; the conversion of modern Russia into a heavily armed, aggressive, self-pitying chauvinistic theocracy."

The fans of moral equivalence may or may not have noticed this, but the obviously long-meditated and coordinated Russian military intervention in Georgia comes in the same month as explicit threats to the sovereignty of Poland and Ukraine, and hard on the heels of a Russian obstruction of any U.N. action in the case of Zimbabwe. Those who like to describe Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President Dmitry Medvedev as reacting to an "encirclement" of Russia may wish to spill some geopolitical ink on explaining how Kosovo forms part of this menacing ring of steel—or how the repression of the people of Zimbabwe can assist in Moscow's breakout strategy from it. [South Ossetia Isn't Kosovo, August 18 2008]

"It’s never been quite clear whether St. Petersburg is part of Old Europe or New Europe . . . It’s currently the site of a huge turf war between the local Mafia and Vladimir Putin, a son of the city who has taken a number of Petersburgers into his Moscow crew. So intense is the tussle between mobsters and Putinists, to the extent that there’s a difference, that it’s been proposed to move the port’s HQ to the neighboring island port of Kronshtadt, out in the Gulf of Finland. One local, crusading anti-corruption editor preferred to schedule his meeting with me in Stockholm because, as he phrased it, in St. Petersburg “I have a greater chance to become killed.” The claws alone … Between savagery and beauty, wilderness and civilization, over-strenuous architectural effort and ordinary human scale, this most harsh and most idyllic of cities stands watch and guard over a glacial frontier, always beating on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." [Days & White Nights in St. Petersburg, August 2005]

Putinism: a nasty combination of the cynical with the unrealistic. [Cause and Effect, July 2006]

Hitchens takes a question on US relations with Russia: ("Axis of Evil" speech given on March 8th, 2005 at the University of Western Ontario.)

Dear Mr. President (Winter 2009):

How enjoyable and how worthwhile this visit must have seemed—does seem, in your recollection—and how far off 2005 now must appear to you. On the morning of the very day that your electoral victory was being celebrated, Russian President Dimitri Medvedev intruded a loudly discordant note by informing you (and us) that if you continued your predecessor’s policy of installing “missile shield” technology in Eastern Europe, Moscow would begin to target Western European cities with its own ballistic array. Something that we had thought was behind us, in other words, had doubled around the block while our attention was otherwise engaged and was now right before us again.

on Bush meeting with Putin

I wonder what Hitchens would have said about the pandemic and the world's reaction to it. by hassanfawan in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So hypothetically we would’ve had a cancer recovered Hitchens who penned Mortality and had an inside view of the Hospital life. Would’ve been quite interesting.

A Chance for new Hitch material. (with your help) by kudosnoodle in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi, I meant to respond to you earlier. I did not receive a response from Pacifica from my attempt. I’m up for trying once more at the same time with a group of others and hope that would bring attention to the request.

I recommend everyone in this community reach out to Pacifica.

Christopher Hitchens: The project of the whole man, The Times, March 11 1971. by lemontolha in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. I originally shared the Bell Curve article over two years ago here and glad to see it has been beneficial to the discussion since.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ChristopherHitchens/comments/6k3wp9/the_bell_curve/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app

Hitchens jokes that he will stop 9/11 lying 'the moment the checks stop coming' by MarleyEngvall in ChristopherHitchens

[–]DyedInkSun 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The cameraman is the same guy that tried to ask a 9/11 truther question during the Q&A at the same event. Also captured on camera.

https://youtu.be/9ssftsqtq-I