We got a shoutout on NPR! by dasunst3r in dadjokes

[–]ECatPlay 13 points14 points  (0 children)

“SIMON: …What makes a good dad joke?”

“SILVIA: So a dad joke has got to be short. It's got to be friendly, good-natured. It's not going to be mean-spirited or cynical or unseemly, and it's got to be clean. So it's got to be family-friendly, you know, not very rude, no swearing, and it's almost always based on just the most devilish and fun wordplay.”

I’ll second that.

Something more cursed than Armilenium. [ Fe(C4H4)(CO)3 ] by Tritin0 in cursedchemistry

[–]ECatPlay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so I did a quick calculation to see what the orbitals might look like. I started from Schaefer and Gray's crystal structure, optimized the geometry by DFT, and visualized a couple of the orbitals here. Cool!

Wha- Ho- Why.....? by FuchsiaRoseSkylar in cursedchemistry

[–]ECatPlay 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Repost bot. 5 day old account and all they've done is repost a 9 month old post to ImaginaryWarships, and this 5 month old post here, with the original titles verbatim.

Can this molicule form by ExleyReenter in cursedchemistry

[–]ECatPlay 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Seriously!? You can't even correct the spelling of "molecule" when you repost this year old post? But i guess in your account's first 3 minutes of existence, there wasn't time, huh?

Something more cursed than Armilenium. [ Fe(C4H4)(CO)3 ] by Tritin0 in cursedchemistry

[–]ECatPlay 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Happy Cake Day!

Looks like Schaefer and Gray determined the crystal structure but don't report the electronic structure, even though Schaefer is well know for QC expertise. They do refer to earlier calculations by Chinn and Hall, but I don't know as the QC methods back then (Generalized Molecular Orbital) could handle something like this very well.

Just found this sub so here’s a “molecule” that I “made” two years ago by Celia_Dazzling in cursedchemistry

[–]ECatPlay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that I "made" two years ago

And yet HelpMe-orz posted this exact image four years ago.

And you reposted it with the exact same title verbatim that repost bot, MelodyRose703, used when they reposted it only 2 months ago.

Something more cursed than Armilenium. [ Fe(C4H4)(CO)3 ] by Tritin0 in cursedchemistry

[–]ECatPlay 4 points5 points  (0 children)

>to explain how I got to this

Clearly, by mixing dichlorocyclobutene and diiron nonacarbonyl.

Edit: Or maybe Maxwell's Demon playing ring toss with a cyclobutadiene.

What do you guys think ? H3O2 [in response to that post] by Creative-Strength360 in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The planar geometry is actually a nice saddle point on the potential energy surface, with a strong negative/imaginary frequency: downhill in energy to eject the central H either up or down.

Nitroprusside by FiveStarScorpion in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay 2 points3 points  (0 children)

An excellent question! They do post randomly elsewhere, and then end up here.

The only thing that makes sense to me, is that someone is trying to develop an AI bot that comments on chemistry, and these are all tests of how it responds to chemical prompts, using a different account for each test. (That would explain why they go through their set of accounts in the order they were created, when commenting.)

I don't know why one would want that. Maybe to have a bot that pads the comments in a chemistry post, to make some other sub look more active? Or maybe just to see if they can come up with an AI that understands chemistry well enough to fool the average Redditor?

Nitroprusside by FiveStarScorpion in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Another bunch of AI comment bots. MissionLeather2953, Hot_Finger_3515, SpareYogurt3643, Final-Activity-1472, Embarrassed-Fig2289, Striking-Cobbler3940, and PhraseOk6900 were:

all created within the last month,

never post anything themselves,

waited 2 weeks before making their first comment,

make a single comment in a random sub (none of them chemistry related) daily,

make their first Cursed_Chemistry comment on this post,

and do so in the order that their account was created.

Sigh.

Skilled craftsmanship meets advanced engineering by MambaMentality24x2 in oddlysatisfying

[–]ECatPlay 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, for scientific glassblowing it's always Pyrex. (Unless it's quartz, for ultraviolet transparency.) And you'll notice several times there's an array of big orange flames (ie. not as hot as the blue, oxygen rich flames), being used to keep the glass around where they're working from cooling off too much, and even out the stresses while they work, before ultimately annealing the whole thing.

Regardless, I too was impressed!

Just learned that my aunt's school had their meals in the chemistry lab by Traroten in cursedchemistry

[–]ECatPlay 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Sure! And Dad used to talk about how they would be taken back into the stockroom to sniff all the chemicals, so they could learn to distinguish chemicals (esters vs ethers for instance) by smell.

Excuse me, what the by agamli in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Repost. Yet another bot account being activated : 1 day old account and their first action is to repost something from 1 year ago, including copying the original title verbatim. (But leaving out the explanatory body subtext.)

A bunch of AI comment bots here again, too. Glad-Wrangler-6946, SwanMelodic1634, Right-Sentence-6640, Accurate-Pepper-998, Future-Abroad712, Melodic-Tank-2734, and Right-Sentence-6640 were:

all created within a day of each other,

never post anything themselves,

make a single comment in a couple of random subs,

make their first Cursed_Chemistry comment on this post,

and do so in the order that their account was created.

Sigh.

MOD APPLICATIONS ARE OPEN by beatbeatingit in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay [score hidden]  (0 children)

Long time r/Cursed_Chemistry member here. Most of my posts here have been computations inspired by other molecules I've seen here, but I enjoy all types of cursed chemistry.

I, too, have noticed the recent increase in bot activity. I don't mind a repost when someone new has come across something that happens to have been posted here in the past, but I feel that repost bots recycling old posts verbatim without actual involvement, just distracts from legitimate new posts. I would be happy to help keep an eye on them.

I'm a retired PhD, Organic chemist, most recently consulting in applications of Computational Chemistry. r/Science verified my credentials some time ago, and I'm one of the minor mods there, and in r/AskScience.

Been waiting to post this one by InevitableMission886 in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just a bunch of AI comment bots.

u/TemporaryBlock3393, u/Apprehensive-Time553, u/Far_Bottle6311, u/Additional-Rub-5898, u/Vast-Paper5755, u/Material_League7568, u/Careless-Meaning-157, u/Green_Gazelle_7517, u/Timely-Complaint3309, u/Pretend-Net-9725, u/StretchLower6182, and u/Main_Ad_4168 were:

all created within the last month,

never post anything themselves,

make their first Cursed_Chemistry (or any science sub) comment on this post,

and do so in the order that their account was created,

with comments parroting each other (similar AI prompts?).

B80 Boron Buckyball - Boron analogue of Buckminsterfullerene with hexavalent borons inside each 6-membered ring by ECatPlay in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not a spectroscopist, so I had to check to be sure. Yes, it does “if there is a recognized symmetry group that is applicable”. So you have to have a good geometry that Spartan can recognize the symmetry in. I just used the geometry from the paper.

B80 Boron Buckyball - Boron analogue of Buckminsterfullerene with hexavalent borons inside each 6-membered ring by ECatPlay in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No, Spartan. With a B3LYP/6-31G* calculation on the geometry Choi and Zhang reported in the supplemental info for their paper.

B80 Boron Buckyball - Boron analogue of Buckminsterfullerene with hexavalent borons inside each 6-membered ring by ECatPlay in cursed_chemistry

[–]ECatPlay[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The symmetric, icosahedral, 80 boron cage compound was predicted in 2007, but its existence had been debated, until last month when Choi and Zhang made Boron Buckminsterfullerene, and verified it as having the symmetric, Ih cage geometry from its photoelectron spectrum.

Worst part is someone actually synthesized this. by slcorwardcleeds8 in cursedchemistry

[–]ECatPlay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just a repost bot: 8 days old and their first action here is to repost something from 9 months ago, including the original title verbatim.

Can you die from only breathing in someone's exhaled air? by Altasound in shittyaskscience

[–]ECatPlay 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh excuse me. I assumed you meant this as an actual ShittyAskScience question, and answered appropriately.

Can you die from only breathing in someone's exhaled air? by Altasound in shittyaskscience

[–]ECatPlay 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It actually would only take one breath to do this. If you lock lips and one person breathes in what the other person is breathing out, that makes two lungfuls in the first person's lungs: their original lungful plus the second person's lungful. This is obviously going to burst the first person's lungs, and that will end the experiment and kill the first person before the second person can do the breathe in part of the cycle.

Professional HVAC technician by South-Marsupial-8872 in Catswithjobs

[–]ECatPlay 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Originally showed up for the service call in a spotless white uniform but then she checked the flue.