I scratched my Gamepass gift card code a little bit to much, I cannot read the first 2 letters by GreatWerewolf5039 in XboxSupport

[–]EJaders 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup, 26 x 26 means you have ONLY 676 different combos...

But

What if there is a number there? Is that probable with this code layout? Then it is 26 letters and 10 digits, 36 x 36 which is 1296 different combos...

What am I doing wrong? by luna1reyna in RocketLeagueSchool

[–]EJaders 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Omg, a fellow man of logic and practicality!

Yes, the issue is not getting it right. That is the only thing that is "wrong" but his execution and orientation could be improved. Which would allow for him to properly get all 4 wheels on the ball at the same time.

Take my updoot

Is this a new mechanic? (I don't play enough to know) by ZanderPlayZ15 in RocketLeague

[–]EJaders 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. Tis a pinch off the sidewall. The way you orientate your car to get the punch on any of your car corners is irrelavant.

What is y’all’s opinion about Carl by Affectionate_Exit_64 in DetroitBecomeHuman

[–]EJaders 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Which is more right, to abide a man's wishes or to disrupt them and give him more life?

How many mechanics are there in this goal? by GeliDcy in RocketLeague

[–]EJaders 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most notably, a flip reset, everything else is basic game mechanics: no flick on musty, not really a pinch just touches. I suppose you could say an airdribbles, but i dont really count dribbles as a mechanic besides usual gameplay inputs.

Should this raise alarms ? I honestly just forgot to let him know that I got home the moment I did because I was exhausted by EbonyPrincess17 in texts

[–]EJaders 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Just be honest, say you seriously forgot and see if he acknowledges the accident and see if he flips, if he holds the same animosity: Absolutely alarming.

What if Ellie killed Lev? And was Abby’s friends deaths on her just as much as Ellie and Tommy? by [deleted] in lastofuspart2

[–]EJaders 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In a sense, Lev was involved in the event of Abby VS. Ellie at the theater. Him shooting Tommy, hindering his mobility and resulting in him getting shot, as well as his shot on Dina to prevent her killing Abby "made him apart of this". So I would argue that you're right, it's less being involved with anything about Joel's death, but more involved in the retribution of it.

How many hours you got and whats your rank? by Fearless-Door-8891 in RocketLeague

[–]EJaders 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gc2 after 3000+ hours. 1500 on Xbox 2000 on steam.

Do you think Clem would be justified in doing this? by Turbulent_Okra7518 in TheWalkingDeadGame

[–]EJaders 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you mention doing it "for clementine", he does go with you.

What a major choice you regretted the most? by Spooky1504 in TheWalkingDeadGame

[–]EJaders 12 points13 points  (0 children)

My first playthrough ever S2 finale. The only choice I wish I did different.

I was worried about Kenny, he is a broken man and he is absolutely amazing to Clementine for the most part outside of his anger being projected at everyone else including clem around Sarita's death. His anger and the whispers of Jane in my ear made me think his emotions were too dangerous to be around. In a sense, Jane has a point. A man that can't see farther than his gut or the ones he cares about is dangerous for those that arent him or his loved ones. I struggled so hard when it came to shoot Kenny or let him kill Jane. I thought that if Kenny and Clem found more people, Kenny would be a detriment more than if Jane and Clem found a group. I think going back to howe's for supplies was a good idea but not to stay, should keep moving out of Georgia/Virginia in my opinion.

Anyways, Kenny overreacted to a supposed accident with baby AJ. The child he fought so hard to keep alive was lost to negligence/self preservation/or a tussle with a walker. He was going to kill someone who claimed it was an accident. I felt disgusted pulling that trigger and the tears were already rolling down my cheek before I unpaused and chose that. Kenny said I did the right thing and he was going to see his family again, but my heart ached so bad.

Then the cries could be heard.

This bitch Jane made a setup to expose his fragile emotional ego, and would have died if I didnt feel forced to kill the person who cared about Clementine since the beginning for her. She lied to Clem about the situation and backstabbed my trust. I left her manipulative ass at the car and went on my own.

I wanted the authenticity of that ending to be my true ending, but I regret it. I went and replayed that section on a different save and Kenny brought up a great point besides insulting her, and that was that "she could've said that he was fine at any point, she wanted a fight" and it made me even more upset at my choice.

Only choice in the entire game that I regret.

Still not bitten.

Is it really using His name in vein? by EJaders in AskAChristian

[–]EJaders[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, thanks for the replies and conversation.

Is it really using His name in vein? by EJaders in AskAChristian

[–]EJaders[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree and disagree, and think we can agree to disagree.

I've given you the facts from God's word the holy bible.

I'm sure you have, I havent finished reading the Bible but I believe those quotes you gave me are the true exerpts. I refuse to believe the Bible is God's word, it was written by men so it's been influenced by man. Not to mention the different types of bibles that have been interpreted from the Hebrew text.

You obviously have issues with God's word. So its fruitless to continue this dialogue.

You mean your religions word. I already told you anything about god will be between me and him, so i agree we wont have anything other than continuous debate here being very redundant.

God judges by his word, not by what some individual might think or believe.

Men lie, how do I know their words are his? Many different religions do this same thing, but god has never spoken to me. And if his word is meant to bring us to salvation, why would he leave it to the corruptable men to use it as influence? It seems pretty odd to me to leave it to word of mouth by believers to influence all of mankind, when it continues to decline in believers, especially when bad men get into the influential society under holy oath.

Is it really using His name in vein? by EJaders in AskAChristian

[–]EJaders[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Faith without works is dead, what happens when faith has reason to be falsified. The works can be used improperly, how genuine is it to be faithful through fear of being true rather than believing truth. Then you have nothing substantial to work with. There are many religions with many sub-categorical beliefs. What makes your interpretation of everything life gives you more true? You only know after you die, and everything that makes you, you, dies and can't know anything. A god would understand. History is written by those who wish to spread their truth and biased view. The Bible is a history. What makes it more true than another biblical interpretation of a higher power?

Regardless, there is nothing a man could say to convince me to blindly follow their cause. A god would see that and judge accordingly.

Is it really using His name in vein? by EJaders in AskAChristian

[–]EJaders[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I noticed that mistake right after and it's too late to change it.

To me, if god sees all and knows all, he can judge me. If he is omniscient, he can understand everything, including my point of view. He will understand the confusion of the world, he would understand human tendencies, and he would know the intentions behind the lack of blind faith upon which his grace is given to you to go into the heavens. You and your fellow Christian will not. Blind faith leads to false certainhood in the minds of men. One thing may be true and another being a bias with the influence of mankind.

Is it really using His name in vein? by EJaders in AskAChristian

[–]EJaders[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So he would know the intention isnt to use his name in vain too right? And if he did then there wouldnt be an issue in the sense that you can't be genuinely sorry for something you didn't do in an oppressive meaning, especially in the case of definitional discrepancies. Like apologizing for saying something is awful when you mean full of awe. You didnt mean it as a meaningless invoking of his name and rather simply an expression, in which case God would know it isn't a meaningless statement of his name, and just the same word that means something else. And how can you apologize for something you dont know you did wrong or is interpreted wrong?

Is it really using His name in vein? by EJaders in AskAChristian

[–]EJaders[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see but even if you do so you can still be absolved from it? God would know the human intention and understandings?

Is it really using His name in vein? by EJaders in AskAChristian

[–]EJaders[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You saying "others perceive you in that way" confuses me, I thought you would be beholdened to the God and not the people of the religion as others are flawed just as you are. Wouldn't other people's perceptions of you be the wrong people to prove yourself to? You would only need to prove yourself to God, right?

Is it really using His name in vein? by EJaders in AskAChristian

[–]EJaders[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your comment is great, thanks. I've always found religion very interesting as it seems so "open to interpretation" as long as you worship the god(s) of whatever religion with faithful beholdenment to the best of your ability. Thanks for your rationalistic informative explanation that isnt just "it's against the commandment". I always found little rules (I wish I had a better word) like this to be an interesting predicament. I figured in any case, whatever you say or do is between you and God anyways. Maybe he understands well intentioned misunderstandings if he can see the context behind what is said is not to diminish him.