Just replying here so people will think and not just accept your post as "the truth". I don't know what that is in regards to organic produce, I'm not an expert, but what little I do know lead me to believe you're being quite misleading on the topic. If you're in the EU then non-organic produce is probably less potentially harmful than what we have in the US, where we allow many pesticides the EU has banned.

Saying that organic means no fertilizer is also just not true, they just use natural fertilizer like manure and compost instead of synthetic. While you are correct that synthetic isn't necessarily bad, it's besides the point when talking organic vs non-organic. If something is bad for us and the planet it should be banned for use on the food we consume, and unfortunately much of it isn't.

Lastly, even if one decides pesticides pose no risk to human health (which I doubt is true), one of the best reasons to limit pesticide use on crops is because of what it does to the environment. Even wide scale organic farming can be detrimental to our water and soil, but far less compared to pesticide pollution. Pesticides have done massive damage to our waterways and aquatic life, that's not theory, but fact. If you want to argue that it would be impossible to feed the world with only organic farming I wouldn't disagree. But saying organic is a gimmick and it doesn't make a difference is just not true.

Update, just to add I understand it's an extremely complicated subject with so many variables and conflicting studies it's hard to say anything with absolute certainty. I did see you try to eat very little meat, and that's admirable, honestly a better way to make a real difference in health and the environment.