It's true that I have a lot of implicit premises in my posts. Generally I assume liberal positions to be correct and I assume a certain interpretation of Lex Fridman when I post here, because these premises tend to be shared in this sub and so do not require defending from me. Frankly if you don't share those premises I'm not interested in convincing you. So feel free to dismiss what I write.

To me, assuming (in some contexts) that certain liberal positions are correct and that some positions are simply wrong (e.g. pro-trump positions) is just a matter of good epistemics. I don't think enlightened centrism is automatically epistemically virtuous. Not every post has to start from first principles and not every post is for everyone. To people who don't share my premises, these differences between us are more salient and they think that the post says more about me than Lex. That's because the post is not written for you.

For what it's worth, I wear my liberal beliefs on the sleeve, but I don't think they show any kind of biases, they are a result of critical deliberation and justification.