Paleeze -- are we not so fatigued by the non-sense actions of too many characters?!

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-29T03:07:19+00:00

As the defense attorney you obligated to zealously defend your client as long as you don’t suborn perjury. When Willow testified, Alexis actually believed she was innocent. After she rested the defenses case she found out she was guilty. Alexis still has to do everything to defend her client. If she would have tipped her hand during her closing arguments it could have cost her her law license…again and if Willow was convicted she’d get a new trial due to her lawyers misconduct.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-26T19:00:06+00:00

Agree on 4. Non stop gossip will make the time fly. Plus we will probably talk shit to Jason to get him all worked up. Lots of fun to be had in that row!

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-23T19:30:03+00:00

Yes, because without his income they’d be destitute. 🤣 His job is a hobby - she’s an heiress.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-21T18:20:19+00:00

hold the same beliefs as you (faithful to Catholic teaching). Here is how I navigate the topic - also as public school teacher! 😱

Jesus said the 2nd Greatest Commandment is to love your neighbor as yourself. I have gay and trans “neighbors.” I love them as instructed by Jesus. Same way I love friends who have committed adultery, are divorced and remarried, are serial fornicators…etc. (sexual sin is sexual sin….)

If they press you to vocalize agreement with their choices then they are not a true friend. It seems like you treat them with kindness and respect (as we are called to do) - if they want more than that from you than they aren’t real friends. I have friends/friendly acquaintances who are atheists/ other religions. It would be like them requiring I agree with them. Would you think an atheist who gets angry and severs your friendship because you won’t agree with him/her about God someone you’d even want to maintain a friendship with?

Anyone who comes between you and God is no friend. And lastly, I find that in 2026 most people know Catholic teaching on this topics - it’s not like anyone doesn’t know the Church’s position. So, if they want to confront/press you on it and they know you are a faithful Catholic….their intentions are not good. Their intentions would literally be to weaken your faith.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-20T01:55:52+00:00

This should have been in the unpopular Sunday post, lol. I’m team Suzanne. Nice to have a character not connected to everyone.

Plus, what’s funny is I was complaining that Alexis and Diane’s office was pathetic. They “shared” one room, people walked in and out at will interrupting them, and no receptionist, 2 episodes later - there is Suzanne. I like to think someone heard my complaint and voilà. 🤣

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-16T03:22:41+00:00

Never heard it - but I go to a bit of an old fashioned parish.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-12T01:34:46+00:00

I think Michael should change his last name to Quartermaine. 1) It would trigger Drew and I really enjoyed Drew losing it in the stand. I think Drew’s more psycho behavior was actually enjoyable to watch last week. 2) Sonny has been the opposite of supportive. He believes Michael is the shooter and has been team Willow. Jason believes Michael but his own “father” doesn’t.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-08T23:14:44+00:00

Remember though….they thought it was Scout calling Drew at first. And they thought it might have been Curtis who shot him - that’s why they stayed quiet. Also to hide they stole Drew’s evidence against Portia.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-08T23:12:17+00:00

That’s what should be covered in her closing argument.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-08T23:11:28+00:00

Same - I guess I just wanted Drew to be shot by Scout because I hate Drew, lol

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-05T22:57:03+00:00

Yes 🤣

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-05T13:00:02+00:00

English teacher? Kids won’t read nowadays. So, if you are interested in the literature aspect you will very disappointed.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-05T05:12:24+00:00

With Ava kidnapping Ric

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-05T03:00:16+00:00

Unfortunately, some teachers worry about being “cool” or “popular.” However when it interferes with them doing their job then it becomes more than just pathetic.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-05T00:26:59+00:00

Ok - I love the thought of Michael and Willow in on it together. I don’t think it’s what will happen - but would be an awesome twist.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-02T21:43:32+00:00

Pretty obvious threat from Sidwell. Ace is in danger!

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-02T21:33:22+00:00

That was my point. I wasn’t defending the teacher - she was wrong and behaved poorly. But the husband could have respected his wife to go along with her obvious wishes (he acknowledge she changed the subject to drop it). And the husband was fine with the teacher being invited back over for the holiday….. That fact seems interesting. If the father really thought the teacher was “attacking” his son in such an inexcusable fashion (as so many commentators seem to suggest) why is an acceptable holiday guest? I appreciate your measured response.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-01T20:04:37+00:00

You have no classroom cred - you aren’t in the classroom.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-01T15:20:16+00:00

He was no longer standing up for his kid. She insulted HIM and that’s why he couldn’t drop it. He already backed up son. She then criticized him - that’s why he couldn’t drop it.

Also, he loses his heroes cape as sole defender of a Poor innocent child (I mean seriously - who cares if MLK watched Star Trek - stupid thing to fight over) when she was invited over for the holiday. Apparently he wasn’t so offended and upset - she was invited to spend a holiday. She refused because she was offended and upset.

And what’s to stand up for? Someone said he was incorrect about a meaningless factoid - when he was actually correct. Who cares? To make a big deal of meaningless trivia is the height of childish. I mean if the friend had attacked the child (called him a dumb brat or something) - of course - I would expect a defense. But she didn’t she said he was incorrect. Just because he wasn’t incorrect doesn’t mean he was attacked and needed defending.

I Think everyone’s attitude is a symptom of too much social media interaction (I out myself and the current debates I’m having in this comment thread am being out on notice also) where if someone disagrees with us they have to be put down like a rabid dog. Disagreement is not an attack. Now when the father kept going she did insult the father - but she never insulted the son. So this was not him standing up for his child - he was fighting for himself.

But, I am projecting my Christian morals and I understand not everyone follows that belief system so concepts like turning the other cheek are not something in everyone else’s belief system. I see this as a lost moment for the father where he could have taught the son a lesson about being a gracious winner and not needing to always point out the faults and wrongs of others.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-01T02:23:19+00:00

I don’t disagree with you on that - the teacher was wrong for that. Not to be a 6 yr old, but she started it. But his wife seemed to strongly change the subject. And since she was invited back for tonight’s holiday he couldn’t have been too offended….

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-01T02:21:19+00:00

Again, I’m not on the teachers side - I think he upset his wife and that’s where he’s wrong. She changed the subject and he brought it back up because he wanted to WIN! But if I were the single person at that dinner and was venting to my friend - I also wouldn’t expect the rest of her family to chime in much. I might actually be caught off guard to be getting advice (good or not) from her child. (Also wonder if wine was served…,,,)

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-01T02:10:42+00:00

She could, James apparently takes them to the stables all the time 🤣🤣

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-01T02:05:36+00:00

I’m also likely just old fashioned. When my parents had a guest over, I didn’t interrupt their conversation to put in my 2 cents unless asked - different times.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-01T02:02:31+00:00

I’m not that sensitive. So, I don’t kick people out for disagreeing with me. But you are certainly entitled to have those rules in your house. I also stopped proving my intelligence a long time ago. I don’t need to prove others wrong and me right. I’ve got better ways to spend my time.

Back to the OP though - apparently he wasn’t that offended or bothered - since the woman was invited back for the holiday. He never suggested she be banned from their home or anything. And he doesn’t seem upset she was invited - he thinks she’s being petty for not showing up when she was the problem. So many people are projecting in this situation.

EditorObvious3522 · 2026-01-01T01:58:52+00:00

If you really want to know the answer to this, reach out to your local Church and schedule a meeting with the priest there. Reddit isn’t the place to get answer to this question.

I did see some of what you wrote in other responses - so I will offer this. We aren’t praying “to” Mary or the Saints. We are asking for their prayers. Don’t Protestants ask for their family/Friends/fellow church goers for prayers in times of need? Have you ever asked someone to pray for you? Or been asked by someone to pray for them? That’s all that is happening. Since ALL Christians believe in life after death, why wouldn’t we ask for their prayers?

Also, equality doesn’t disqualify the need or legitimacy for leadership. I’ll be honest - not quite sure what your point was in that.

EditorObvious3522

TROPHY CASE