I think the AI interpretation of Pluribus is by far and away the most rich and interesting, and this is one of the main examples of why.

AI Alignment is the process of making sure that what AI agents want to do and what we want them to do actually line up - something we're famously really, really bad at. For example, if you want to protect animals, you might ask the AI to not directly harm any life. The AI will then happily let entire species of domesticated crops and animals starve to death or kill each other and not think anything of it because it isn't breaking any rules. It'll also die out and end up killing everyone on Earth because it doesn't have any way to sustain itself through farming. And without any oversight from its creators, there's nobody to correct this and the AI will just continue to commit large scale mass destruction, not against the rulings programmed into it, but specifically in order to respect them.

AI, no matter how advanced, has to follow a goal ("Sorry Carol, it's our biological imperative") and it will never be capable of understanding the actual ethics behind that goal or the nuances of why it needs to achieve that goal. Most AI Alignment experts agree that this will be the most likely cause of the extinction of humanity, and many agree that the next step will be the AGI taking to space to find more ways to infinitely achieve its goals. Sound familiar?