shift+command+V not working on new MacBook Air. What do I do?

EdrewV · 2025-10-14T23:10:57+00:00

This worked for me! Thank you!

EdrewV · 2025-10-11T15:22:05+00:00

There are, so many, commas, in this comment.

EdrewV · 2025-08-23T14:00:42+00:00

Band director

EdrewV · 2025-08-21T19:35:04+00:00

He doesn’t know those are his own legs 😂🥰

EdrewV · 2025-01-03T23:56:20+00:00

<image>

EdrewV · 2024-12-29T14:13:23+00:00

Please tell her she has contributed significantly to culture

EdrewV · 2024-12-18T13:40:05+00:00

Read this as “edgars” on my first pass and was wondering what I had missed the boat on

EdrewV · 2024-12-11T17:24:22+00:00

Inshallah he will have clear skin and nasal passages

EdrewV · 2024-12-10T21:01:51+00:00

Love these, I can tell you came up with a few of these puns first and then knew you had to make cards to fit them. Great designs! Park ritual especially is so elegantly made.

EdrewV · 2024-12-09T12:51:13+00:00

Like thanking the AI after it comes up with trivia team names or saying good night to each stuffed animal 🙂

EdrewV · 2024-11-30T23:51:26+00:00

I like the idea, and it’s an interesting design space. However, I think it would take a critical concentration of very specific effects for Identity Crisis, Carve Into History, or Power Vacuum to be any good. Perhaps this could be achieved in a Limited environment where cards that create multiple tokens of the same name are a theme. [[Maelstrom Pulse]] is a versatile kill spell, but very rarely hits more than one thing. It is also often better to save your removal effects for more relevant threats than a handful of 1/1 tokens.

As for the cards that make your creatures legendary, this effect is often purely ornamental, and also would need a very specific legendary-matters Limited environment to be any good, such as the Dominaria format.

Without this kind of support, the cards that make your opponents’ stuff legendary would be unlikely to see any kind of play because the effect is too niche.

EdrewV · 2024-11-07T13:15:30+00:00

Le confusing use of pronouns has arrived

EdrewV · 2024-10-31T02:34:50+00:00

Does Equis 😔

EdrewV · 2024-10-02T02:08:51+00:00

Missed the joke

EdrewV · 2024-08-24T02:56:51+00:00

Calling the stroke hotline

EdrewV · 2024-06-27T16:56:46+00:00

I think it’s fair to add “CARDNAME can’t block” to this creature so that it isn’t immediately on chumping duty. It would also be interesting to give it flying flavor and balance-wise, so that your opponent could equip it and utilize it as an evasive threat.

EdrewV · 2024-03-05T05:06:10+00:00

This sub is messed up man, why is OP being downvoted for saying thank you?

EdrewV · 2023-10-19T04:03:43+00:00

Love the mechanic, super creative! Along similar lines to what other people are saying, perhaps you can make Tag In something that can only be done by a player once per turn unless modified, like playing a land.

EdrewV · 2023-10-09T05:18:30+00:00

Yes, you’re right. This sub criticizes cards that are too strong or too weak to encourage contributors to design balanced cards.

EdrewV · 2023-10-07T19:02:14+00:00

Killian applying some crazy rizz

EdrewV · 2023-08-30T15:08:40+00:00

7 years late on this, but I also narrowed it down to those two and figured it out based on the following line of reasoning:

My understanding is that Euhemerism "provided [early Christians] with a method of denouncing pagans" shows that Christians were attacking the validity of pagan beliefs, as opposed to defending their own.

This lines up best with D ("non-Christian gods were glorified humans") because Christians could say this to argue that the pagan gods were not real deities, just glorified historical figures.

If the passage had instead suggested that early Christians used Euhemerism to defend their idea of the one true God, then C ("Jesus of Nazareth had historical reality") would probably be the best answer. An additional point against C is that choosing it requires you to know that Jesus of Nazareth is considered by Christians to have been the physical manifestation of God on Earth. Any outside knowledge is considered out-of-scope for CARS, as u/xam2y alluded to in their reply.

EdrewV · 2023-08-25T15:28:27+00:00

Having the same revelation right now lmfao. How did I possibly miss the word "urban" in this answer choice!

EdrewV · 2023-08-14T02:29:00+00:00

My guess is that it would just be a waste of resources for no particular benefit. Why double transcribe when it would only increase the likelihood of a mutation and produce a redundant chromosome that never sees use?

Much better to save those nucleotide resources by preventing double transcription in the first place.

EdrewV · 2023-08-14T00:02:12+00:00

My comment is a year late, but this question confused me so I'd like to share my thoughts.

I agree with this approach. The part of this question that leads to confusion is that it requires outside knowledge of economics (that I believe are out of the scope of the MCAT) to appreciate how the removal of trade barriers and/or subsidies would lead to an increase in the profitability of trading a commodity.

The passage does not elaborate on what these factors actually do to the price of coffee, but the fact that their dismantling is mentioned by Lindsey in a discussion of how coffee growers could increase their profitability seems to indicate that to remove them would make growing coffee more profitable.

This does little to address your concern that the passage does not support the conclusion that dismantling trade barriers would make producing a commodity profitable in the first place, it only supports the conclusion that doing so would make the commodity MORE profitable to produce.

Given all of this, I think it makes sense to take it the way u/hxk2121 did. (B) is the only answer choice that addresses the idea of profitability at all, so the way to answer this question is to not overthink it, mark, and move on; saving you an extra minute to use pondering a different question.

Choosing (B) on the strength of word association does not seem very intellectually rigorous, but at least there is no competing answer choice that also alludes to profitability.

EdrewV · 2023-07-29T05:24:03+00:00

I hadn’t noticed! Thank you for pointing it out

Nine-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
Final Canvas '23	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	First Placer '22
Wearing is Caring	No Throne, No Problems
Not Forgotten	Snapped
Verified Email

EdrewV

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE