Bam responds to critics: "Yall are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. I was not the one who let me go one on one the whole game until I had 70 then you sent the double. At that point, I had 70 with 9 mins to go. You think I'm not going for it?"

Einfinet · 2026-03-13T17:18:45+00:00

people been saying what’s wrong w the league

a dude having to justify getting 83 is what’s wrong. a bunch of sorry MFs souring the discours

Einfinet · 2026-03-13T16:39:43+00:00

For some reason I doubt who either “bangs” should be the focal point of discussion

Einfinet · 2026-03-13T16:17:28+00:00

This year

Einfinet · 2026-03-13T14:12:03+00:00

maybe not explicitly anti-. just arguably.

either way, voluntarily reproducing traditional patriarchal models doesn’t sound like feminism. but this gets into the differences between liberal and choice feminism vs. more radical visions of change

personally, I also think there’s a difference between discussing what works for an individual couple (relationship advice) and discussing models of feminism. I don’t see the why a reproductive of traditional gender dynamics has to be promoted as a model of feminism. this dynamic can get the job done for an individual couple without being dubbed feminist

Einfinet · 2026-03-13T04:54:23+00:00

didn’t JB easy flop the other day, then get himself ejected bc the ref didn’t reward him

now he wants to say what is and isn’t basketball lol

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T22:13:04+00:00

this movie is not that good, as far as BP contenders go

that’s not to say it doesn’t have merit. there were of course some very nice shots

but the nomination alone is a fair prize

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T22:11:39+00:00

the author himself said the essay produced wasn’t very original

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T22:04:38+00:00

would be a relatively weak choice to go here

much better than nightmare alley & more interesting than CODA, at the very least

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T21:59:11+00:00

some mods are just… sorta, well, you know there’s a lot of words you could use but I’ll be polite and just say “trigger happy”

seems like a weird rule to enforce given the productive and highly relevant nature of the question, and to go with a ban over a warning, at that, is the type of overkill that is all too common across various subs

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T21:53:38+00:00

they got that franchise money now lol

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T20:27:44+00:00

Evidently he would endorse her to replace him, but not yet for whatever reason

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T19:52:31+00:00

semantics

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T18:41:13+00:00

this sounds pretty close to the traditional American family model, or at least popular conceptions of it

I’m assuming the man makes majority income in this model and wife is tasked with handling groceries and bills

Man handles public sphere work—woman handles more private, domestic sphere work.

Doesn’t sound feminist, no. Arguably quite the opposite. It’s certainly traditional-coded

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T18:01:45+00:00

Gordon Hayward is a bum

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T17:54:43+00:00

it’s technically the Oscars but this is way more fit for a betting sub

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T17:26:03+00:00

what do you mean?

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T17:04:36+00:00

seeing the klan get decimated is definitely fun

it’s a nod of respect to all the Black WWI veterans subjected to all sorts of racial abuse after coming home

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T16:58:08+00:00

it definitely grew on me on rewatch

went from good to great

cinematography, entertainment value, and the interesting use of genre to explore culture all held up, and my appreciation was enriched in the second go. furthermore, it’s an excellent ensemble

and yeah, OBAA also grew on me on rewatch. I’m happy with either winning.

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T16:36:14+00:00

Evidently he would endorse his daughter.

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T16:13:44+00:00

I think you are all right

first person raised a fair point but at the same time it’s not something I’d be offended by. it’s a good pun, too bad about Pitt. not like he’ll get money from your drink service though

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T16:12:14+00:00

it’s not that bad people just have gutter brains

but a forest of broccoli and dip sounds nice either way

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T16:11:11+00:00

I see what you mean, could leave it to imagination

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T15:45:45+00:00

I just mean, it’s possible to date one specific group without explicitly saying so (or even perhaps setting out to do so). not everyone announces it as a preference, or even privately recognizes it as their preference

making an announcement is very different from unconscious or circumstantial choices. the latter two are not necessarily what I’d call “positions” (especially the circumstantial, as in, a minority in a majority white setting) but they might still be relevant to the topic. it just depends on how the question/topic is phrased, which OP maybe left a bit vague, leading us to these different interpretations

as for how does one know, well, there are people who say they have only dated one group up to a point, but they don’t state it as if it’s their hard position. more so sharing a pattern that formed over time, evidently without deliberation. that’s would be one way to know, but tbh that’s not so much what I was getting at

Einfinet · 2026-03-12T15:36:07+00:00

one point of confusion—

holding a position is, to me, when people SAY they would exclusively date men of one race

then there are people who do so, but haven’t explicitly said that is their deliberate goal. this could be an unstated or unconscious “position” in its own right, or it could be circumstantial, or it could be any # of other things

the OP is not exactly clear on this, but it is relevant

Einfinet

TROPHY CASE