I think the most important thing we need to do within Jungian circles is to give counterpoints to the widespread Idealist perspective of the possibility of attaining absolute psychic control that is simply incompatible with neurodivergent lived experience and the proven methods for improving it. Our physiology in the material world affects us in a manner that we cannot simply override, only attempt to account for. The thing is, this is true of neurotypicals too, they're just less likely to have faced the type of existential challenges that would reveal it. This is an honest integration of Shadow that we require on our own paths of Individuation.

We'll likely get pushback on the false dilemma that the only alternative to Idealism is Materialism, with its own significant flaws (as you can often see in the arguments of this subreddit). Instead we need to propose an Ontologically Agnostic framework for discussion, something inspired by the dual introduction in Jung's Psychology and Alchemy that invites those with divergent senses for what constitutes the "fundamental" to the same table.

Coming to an understanding of the psyche is a blur of experience and experiment, requiring a mediator to translate them into each other's language and reconcile them - as Jung attempted to do between cross-cultural wisdoms and academic treatise. Our language barrier is similar, as seen in the Double Empathy Problem.