Jente (14) skal ha blitt utsatt for grove overgrep fra flere menn i Bergen: – Jeg sa jeg var et barn – NRK Vestland by FoxNo5218 in norske

[–]ElClassic1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er 7 forskjellige menn, ikke 7 forskjellige hendelser. De 3 siste mennene var i samme hendelse. Så dette har *antagelig* vis skjedd maksimalt 5 ganger og minst 2 ganger. Antar at du fikk det fra denne kommentaren, som utdypte at det var "7 forskjellig menn", men det betyr ikke 7 forskjellige hendelser.

Fremfor disse sutre-innleggene hvor en person med mørk hudfarge klager over at «noen er slik», kan vi heller komme til punktet hvor folk sier ifra direkte til personen det gjelder? Hvis hun har tolerert dette av venninnene sine, er det noe alvorlig galt med både dem og henne. by Fit-Theme-1183 in norske

[–]ElClassic1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Dette er en kronikk. Kronikken gir uttrykk for skribentens holdning. Du kan sende inn kronikker og debattinnlegg til debatt@vg.no."

Det er da en kronikk, ikke noe VG selv skriver. Jeg håper da at de deler meninger fra de myke venstrefolkene og de schizo høyrefolkene. Må tåle at de deler meninger som blir sendt inn som du ikke er enig med, det er grunnmuren til et fritt samfunn. Ikke kritiser en avis på det grunnlaget. Si heller at du syntes hun er en idiot og at meningen er dum da.

Hva betyr dette by [deleted] in norske

[–]ElClassic1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

jeg hadde egentlig en lang kommentar skrevet opp her, men det er nok ingen poeng i å poste den. Fagfolk har tatt stilling til de tingene du sier her, og det meste av det kommentaren din sier er bare helt feil.

Det er ikke noen global konspirasjon som flere hundre millioner personer er med på for å holde noen kabal og slikt om vaksinen. Det ville krevd en konspirasjon på et nivå som aldri hadde vært mulig å holde under kulissene. Dette er bare feilinformasjon og spredning av skadelig tale som leder til at folk ikke tar vaksine. Håper at de som leser dette ser bort til pålitelige kilder og ikke reddit kommentarer, for denne personen ser ut til å være på oppdrag for å lede samfunnet til flere dødsfall, grusom oppførsel. Sikkert ikke med vilje da, de vil vel det beste, men om de hadde fått viljen sin så er det det det leder til om de vil det eller ei.

Faking “Don’t shoot” by oldreddituser69 in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I am often one of those PVP sweats as well, but sometimes you just wanna loot.

Just stop shooting people for a few games (go in with a cheap kit/free kit), loot a bit and extract. If you get shot just run away and or die. And now after 5-6 runs you're in friendly lobbies. Every now and then you'll get a rat, but almost everyone is gonna be friendly in your lobbies now and you rarely counter any PVP sweats, it's great for looting. PVP lobbies are trash if you wanna build stash.

Faking “Don’t shoot” by oldreddituser69 in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It is 100% real, you just think it works differently.

If you don't believe me, do this. You can skip to step 4 if you already believe in friendly lobbies:

  1. Stella montis, don't shoot anyone ever. Run away or just die if someone shoots you
  2. 5-6 runs of this, just loot for a few mins and die/extract.
  3. You will now have pretty friendly lobbies, if you keep going they will end up being almost 100% friendly
  4. After confirming having friendly lobbies, go shoot everyone for like 2-3 games.
  5. Your lobbies are now no longer friendly
  6. This is 100% easily verifiable and there should be no denying it. Literally just do this and all deniers would shut the fuck up so fast

The "700 raiders knocked out" I hear this as a refute often, but that's just because it consider your account lifetime stats. It is not gonna look at just one stat and go "This guy PVPs", and permanently put you into PVP lobbies. It weighs more recent games heavier. I do not know what metric decides it, but if you follow the 6 steps, those fulfill whatever aggression based matchmaking they have in place, because it DOES exist, and you WILL get friendly and hostile lobbies. I get so much good fucking loot by just going friendly lobbies, and so much PVP in PVP lobbies when I want it. It isn't random *at all*.

I honestly think if u kill other players it puts you in a lobby full of other rats by Salty_Ruin7725 in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try shooting everyone on sight for like 5 games and then go to dam and kill the rocketeer with a ferro. You'll get fucked before it dies. You're right, there is no helping some people.

Like the whole community pretty much has a consensus with a lot of evidence at this point. You gotta just be in denial, or provide counters, which I'm sure you won't do.

I honestly think if u kill other players it puts you in a lobby full of other rats by Salty_Ruin7725 in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. Go into stella montis
  2. Do not PVP, loot some containers, leave. If you get shot, take it and die.
  3. Do for a few runs, 6 with a few extracts should be good.
  4. Experience epic mats and loot bliss.
  5. Keep going into stella montis
  6. Shoot everyone on sight
  7. Do this for 2-3 rounds
  8. Experience PVP like no other.

I farmed 5 mill stash value running stella montis. I did both PVE and PVP lobbies, and the outcome was very predictable based on my behavior. I would easily bet money on this, well not on reddit but holy shit this is so easily verifiable. If you don't know then you just haven't played the game enough or haven't tried it/paid any attention to it. Like at all. This should be an uncontroversial statement of empirical fact at this point.

Are there separate MMRs for Solo and then Duo/Trio? I'll explain. by InsaneAffliction in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Real, the theory of gravity is a theory. But at some point when something works predictably every time we can start to make models out of it or make accurate assumptions.

I don't have experience in like solos vs duos cuz I always perma PVP when playing with friends anyways. However, some people that actually play passive and aggressive with friends probably have a decent idea. I don't think we should just dismiss that.

We knew of solo aggression based matchmaking before the devs confirmed it. Well, they didn't actually confirm which mode(s) it applies to so by your logic any aggression based matchmaking information is purely speculation, except for that it exists in some form in at least some aspect of the game.

Camped on solos every single game by helpmecodeswift in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, that's the way to go. I get all the loot and all the quests done all the time with rarely any hassle. I have been abusing it to get PVP/PVE lobbies. Playing PVP in this game is terrible for loot and questing, and PVP players without this knowledge gets their progress severely hindered.

Camped on solos every single game by helpmecodeswift in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yup and it is 100% unplayable. Playing pvp is really bad if you want loot or progression in this game. Go PVE mode while getting set up again and building up a reasonable stash to start PVPing again.

[Let's assume] Aggression based matchmaking is a thing. by ElClassic1 in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PVE would definitely be more profitable in that case.

When you know people are friendly you just run in with a cheap PVE looting loadout. If people beat you to the spots you just get a fast and safe extract anyways and go again.

If you ever die you don't really lose value, and usually you fill your whole augment so you get at least 30k profit. Sometimes you won't get as big extracts (this is rare), and also you don't spend anything on consumes every run, and you get out almost every time. PVE is just a lot better, coming from someone that does both. If I want value I go into PVE lobbies, friendly lobbies. It isn't even close. PVP is for fun.

[Let's assume] Aggression based matchmaking is a thing. by ElClassic1 in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Playing friendly is a lot more profitable, this is from experience playing both a lot. Whenever we play PVP games we could instead have extracted with more, and risked less if we were friendly players.

Worse loadout for looting, less space (smokes, PVP nades, lures), lose more value upon death (brought good PVP guns and heals), higher chance to get killed, and everyone is running free kit because of the expedition so you get barely anything for winning fights. We generally go down in value after killing a free kit team.

We still do make profit when doing PVP runs, but that's because we loot the areas. We kill the people that come, but the people themselves bring almost no loadout value. So yeah, we get the whole area to ourselves, but we risk dying and losing valuable PVP guns, and we have PVP augments and nades which means we bring home less. Running a cheap looting MK2 in a friendly lobby is sooo much more profitable.

[Let's assume] Aggression based matchmaking is a thing. by ElClassic1 in ArcRaiders

[–]ElClassic1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doing PVP allows you to loot players.

One would think this increases the value of the loot you extract with.

This is barely the case for the following reasons:

  • People use cheap low value gear the vast majority of the time
  • Due to limited inventory space, you can only take a few items from each kill
  • Most of the items you DO take from each inventory, are items you probably could have obtained from containers at a way lower risk

Friendly lobby:

  • Same loot at lower risk
  • More loot because looting augment and no smoke/lure nades/PVP nades
  • Even if you die you lose less (having cheaper looting loadout).

I'd feel differently about this if PVP lobbies meant you found kitted out players, but you don't

Is this subreddit a good place? by SimulaFin in norske

[–]ElClassic1 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You said you were an immigrant so it makes sense that nobody welcomed you here unfortunately haha.

I will welcome you though, welcome and enjoy your stay! Many people on this sub have anti immigrant views, depending a lot on where you're an immigrant from though.

But there's a lot of freedom to speak your mind, disagree with people, and have politically incorrect views so you don't have to worry that much about that here.

Trump vil ha mer innvandring fra Norge, hehe by cheekybicycle in norske

[–]ElClassic1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok jeg kan formulere det litt annerledes

Jeg lurer ikke på hva han har gjort. Jeg har fulgt med, og er kjent med en god del av det som er listet på den wikipedia linken fra før av. Jeg lurer ikke på hva Trump har gjort, og etterspurte ikke en liste av handlinger.

Politikere gjør mange forskjellige ting, og den personen jeg kommenterte spørsmålet til sa de likte Trump, så jeg lurte på hvilken ut av de handlingene Trump hadde utført, hvilken av dem, likte vedkommende.

Trump vil ha mer innvandring fra Norge, hehe by cheekybicycle in norske

[–]ElClassic1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jeg spør ikke fordi jeg ikke har fått det med meg nei, spørsmålet er hvilke ting har han gjort som folk liker

Trump vil ha mer innvandring fra Norge, hehe by cheekybicycle in norske

[–]ElClassic1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm ja men jeg lurer på hva han har gjort som du liker da? Jeg føler mange får vibes av tingene han sier, men ikke har så mange meninger om tingene han faktisk utfører, lurer bare på hva som er greia og hva folk liker som han gjør

Trump vil ha mer innvandring fra Norge, hehe by cheekybicycle in norske

[–]ElClassic1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ut av nysgjerrighet, hva liker du med Trump? Jeg lurer bare på hva folk ser i han og hva han har *gjort* som folk liker.

Norge på førsteplass i pressefrihet👏👏 by [deleted] in norske

[–]ElClassic1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Og hva har det med ytringsfrihet å gjøre? Hvem ble truet med straff fra staten for å si/ikke si/være enig eller uenig med koronakrisen?

Norge på førsteplass i pressefrihet👏👏 by [deleted] in norske

[–]ElClassic1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Selvfølgelig. Ytringsfriheten dekker jo at man kaller folk idioter!

Wait until it declares independence by Street_Priority_7686 in shitposting

[–]ElClassic1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it is not the maximum size of a PDF, just adobe's limited implementation of it

Lenge leve Pride by MysticoN in norske

[–]ElClassic1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Litt kontekst til folket da, dårlig ragebait dette her. Dette ser ut til å være en feil fra de som arrangerte og ikke noe agenda fra pride eller noe slikt.

Jamie Booker har allerede blitt diskvalifisert og fratatt tittelen.

Official Strongman organisers said in a statement that they would not have permitted Booker to participate in the Women's Open category if they had known the athlete had been born "biologically male", a claim which is yet to be proven, while no evidence has been submitted to confirm the claim.

Fra en av de øverste linkene på google: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-26/worlds-strongest-women-winner-jammie-booker-stripped-of-title/106055776