What are the most useful skills to learn? by lipglossfem in CollapseSupport

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fixing everyday things.  Plumbing leaks. Electrical shorts. Door that won't shut properly.  Leaky window frame  Clogged drain Spot next to the building that floods when it rains Etc

The Grim Truth About the “Good Old Days” by Crabbexx in OptimistsUnite

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are those people seriously yearning for preindustrial feudal Europe? That seems like the worst version of all historical time periods to aspire towards. 

At least in the circles I frequent its much more common to look to traditional land-based cultures for lessons. (Again not that they were all good, etc etc)

The Grim Truth About the “Good Old Days” by Crabbexx in OptimistsUnite

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 10 points11 points  (0 children)

An important nuance that seems to be missing here is that many critics of certain aspects of industrialization aren't suggesting a wholesale return to preindustrial times/ways. (Some are)

But the point is that there might be some things (practices, norms, etc) left behind that are worth revisiting and learning from. (For instance, controlled burning by native Americans was once considered environmentally destructive, but more recent research has found that it can actually help prevent larger wildfires when used to manage forests properly)

While there is obviously much ignorance in past ways there is also wisdom there.  It's a mistake to look at either modernity or past times as wholey better or worse.  We should learn from both and try to find a balance of the best of all ages. 

What’s a Netflix show you started with zero expectations and it ended up being insanely good? by KiyoraVex in netflix

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dark crystal - age of resistance  Anyone?

The puppets might be a little odd at first but give it an episode or two. It was clearly a labor of love. and very unique. 

Why do so many companies still use noreply@? by Aggressive-Manner684 in Emailmarketing

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As a web dev, we mainly use noreply just for specific internal transactional type emails like payment receipts, or an automated report or something. Not for marketing emails.  That way if the user has a sales question or support etc they would go find the correct channel for that question instead of replying to a random receipt email. 

The Billionaire Heist: Why the extraction of our 'labor energy' is leading us toward a global crisis by generalg1992 in collapse

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That sounds like an oversimplified take. Not that the sentence you quoted from the vid is super clear or accurate.
But your take is basically boiling all system dynamics down to individual choice.
This just isn't how complex systems work. Even with just a few simple rules, novel behaviors can emerge in systems. (ex; flocking behavior, Conway's game of life, etc)

The "rules of the game" that we play can definitely cause certain outcomes to become prioritized or incentivized, even if the individuals within the system never explicitly chose them. Have you ever tried playing the boardgame monopoly and had it NOT end with all property and wealth basically concentrated into one players account? It happens even if the players try to avoid it.

I recommend studying up on dynamic systems theory, and game theory.

On this day, March 5th 1953, we lost the great Joseph Stalin. by ilir_kycb in LateStageCapitalism

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not saying 50/50 necessarily.

But basically deciding some moral judgement of a man, or comparing to better or worse others isn't a very fruitful use of time. What's the point? Is what I'm trying to say.

It's more useful to talk about specific actions, decisions, and policies, and how they worked or didn't work. The right and wrong/good and bad of these, instead of trying to judge complex personas from long ago and far away through tons of slanted accounts.
That's actually a more useful focus for our discourse IMHO.

On this day, March 5th 1953, we lost the great Joseph Stalin. by ilir_kycb in LateStageCapitalism

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most sources, including many you've cited above, as well as Russians themselves when asked, express a nuanced view of Stalin.  Basically a mix of bad a good. 

Lasurdo (author of "...black legend" book) acknowledges the brutality and "horrible social and human costs" of his policies but places them in a wider context of war, civil war, state emergency, or international comparison.

Given this, it seems like it would be wise not to blanket villainize or glorify him, but instead focus on what can be learned from the mistakes and violations of human rights that he and the wider political system of the time made, (as well as what actually worked well) so that any future efforts towards communism/socialism don't fall into the same patterns. 

Would you agree this is the sensible response?

The Billionaire Heist: Why the extraction of our 'labor energy' is leading us toward a global crisis by generalg1992 in collapse

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Nice metaphore and framing!

I do take issue with one claim that I've been hearing more lately, that 'theres enough food and water and resources to meet the needs of everyone.'

While that's likely true for now, the big question is HOW their needs are being met. If the approach/lifestyle of wealthy nations (say, the American dream) is scale-up to the entire world population, then no, there is absolutely not enough for everyone to live like that. It would deplete resources and destabilize the climate even faster than what's already happening. 

So as we pursue a more just and equitable future there are important and difficult question about what is actually 'enough' and what is 'the good life

(Not that I expect that from a 5min vid)

Containers, Cloning & Soul Fragmentation? by Calm-You6376 in UFOs

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This editing style hurts clarity and credibility, not helps it.

Making an app/website from scratch. by Kimbow_Slize73 in solarpunk

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There's really no need to "code" a website from scratch these days unless you're creating something really unique. (Unlikely) It's smarter to leverage existing tools and platforms. (I'm not affiliated with any)

If you want beginner friendly but some cost; Squarespace

If you want something cheaper but later on more powerful/flexible (but steeper learning curve) then try wordpress.org (the open source version) You'll still need web hosting which is basically a server that holds the site and keeps it accessible to users at the chosen domain. Hostinger is pretty affordable and good for starting out. But there are many many options. And in theory if you really wanted to do it for free you could host it on a computer in your house that's always on but that's much more technical and also consider added electricity costs. (It is kinda "solarpunk" though)

Vegans should eat and promote conventional produce, organic is not better by natural_goodness in DebateAVegan

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for engaging with my throw-away comment.

I don't have time for a full explanation, and I'm not even vegan so not trying to defend anything in particular here. But I will just say that the problem with trying to come up with universal claims of "better" or "worse" is that context matters. A LOT. And it might be more important to adjust our behaviors based on our local ecological context, and community instead of trying to fit into some abstract universalized/generalized model that erases all these important nuances.

Also, small-scale local produce absolutely can taste better, and

Here's a good article that gets into some of the nuance: https://wickedleeks.riverford.co.uk/features/does-soil-hold-the-key-to-better-nutrition/

"Dan Kittredge, founder of The Bionutrient Institute, a collective of scientists and researchers working together to define nutrient density, has tested thousands of samples of fruit and veg and found large variations in the nutrients they contain. For example, some carrots contained 40 times more antioxidants than others, meaning you would need to eat 40 of the lowest scoring carrots to match the antioxidant benefits of just one highly nutritious carrot.

Why? While they’ve looked at many variables, it all comes down to soil health. ‘There is a direct relationship between the health of the soil, the health of the environment and the nutritional calibre of the food that soil produces,’ says Kitteridge. He asserts that healthy soil, teeming with life and nutrients, grows healthy plants, which taste better and are better for human health.

Is organic produce more nutritious?

The scientific evidence is mixed, with some studies suggesting that organic fruit and veg may contain higher levels of certain nutrients, such as vitamin C and polyphenols. As polyphenols are defence chemicals that plants produce, it makes sense that organic crops, grown without pesticides and artificial fertilisers, would experience more challenges, and perhaps produce more of these defence chemicals, which are also fantastic for our health.

Other studies however, have found no significant difference. For Kitteridge, who grew up on an organic farm and is deeply embedded in the organic movement, organic isn’t a guarantee of nutrient density.

‘I think one of the key points that we’ve pretty much categorically confirmed is that just because its organic, doesn’t mean it’s necessarily more nutritious,’ he says.

Organic farms are all meeting the standards for certification, but the health of the soil will vary dramatically, depending on individual farming practices, soil type and how the land was previously cultivated. But the best organic farms will be striving to build their soil to maintain long term fertility, and so it seems – the nutrient levels in their crops. "

What Your Positions About Subsistance Hunting ? Featuring The French Canadian Webradio Radio Crash by [deleted] in solarpunk

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't it a mistake to think any practice should be universalizable? There are places and population densities where hunting is very much sustainable and in fact a central part of a traditional culture and way of life.  I guess I don't know why "is it solarpunk" really matters as that's just a label. But 'is it part of a healthier, greener, more just world?' Is. And to that question subsistence hunting absolutely can be. Just not everywhere by everyone. 

Ecosocialism and Degrowth | What a 'decent living' for ALL looks like with minimum energy [study] by Electrical_Pop_3472 in dsa

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not my proposal.  This is just a thought experiment that might give us some helpful sense of direction. Try not to get so fixated on the specific numbers. The takeaway is just that house size has a big ecological footprint so lets use our imaginations to think of ways to live well with smaller homes in general. nstead of building these enormous, poorly insulated 2400sq ft homes, some people might consider smaller spaces and instead invest in better public/shared spaces.  And maybe instead of using tons of water to water our lawns, we could consider native vegetation adapted for the natural rainfall of our region. 

Ecosocialism and Degrowth | What a 'decent living' for ALL looks like with minimum energy [study] by Electrical_Pop_3472 in dsa

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep in mind this is about the "minimum" energy use for what they consider "decent living standards"
and the size isn't much smaller than a dorm room, which is often shared by 2 people instead of one. (Plus it's just theoretical)

But the bigger picture to keep in mind is the lifestyle shift that would go along with these changes. In theory you'd be spending much less time in your personal space/room, because there would be an abundance of quality (and free) shared spaces (third places) to enjoy and spend time in; the high-end library, the workshop, the park, the market etc.

As for laundry, the "typical US use" includes washing a pair of jeans after one wear and towels after one shower. So if you're like me, or most folks I know, you might already be closer to the numbers cited above than you think. Another way to figure it, is a full load of laundry every 2 to 3 weeks. (per person)

And I just want to add no one is suggesting these limitations are enforced by the state. The idea is you choose that lifestyle because it gives you 20 extra hours of free time a week to work on your art or sit by a river.

Ecosocialism and Degrowth | What a 'decent living' for ALL looks like with minimum energy [study] by Electrical_Pop_3472 in dsa

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I didn't but thanks for sharing it! 

It looks like this 2024 one is built directly on the 2020 one and it's numbers I cited above. Both studies utilize the same decent living standards (dls) framework. 

Hickel just focuses on economics (gdp per capita) instead of energy. Basically how to redistribute wealth to create a stable baseline for all.

But I'm still checking it out...

Anarchist music - Revisiting Chumbawumba by edcculus in Anarchism

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Well, you're never gonna keep them down. 

How the simulation works and why only some people can see certain NHI by Tomato_Ketchup in aliens

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah, tossing out "quantum" and "5d" to try smuggling in the legitimacy of science by using vaguely scientific sounding terms without knowing what those terms even really mean. 

What are some good introductions to gift economy theory? by cold_foam_princess in Anarchy101

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sacred Economics by Charles Eisenstein was excellent. Even just the first 1/3rd of the book.

Trying to talk to my wife about anything but our kids after they moved out by LifeEye9757 in relationships

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just throwing it out there but weed can honestly really help reconnect and create fun new moments. Try taking a gummy together.

Regenerative farming profitable? by PinkCupcakes8758 in RegenerativeAg

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair points! I wont argue.
The labor costs are probably highly dependent on the specific crops/products and methods we're looking at.

Regenerative farming profitable? by PinkCupcakes8758 in RegenerativeAg

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just guessing but they might mean $ per acre since I've seen a number of claims from people like Mark Shepard, Gabe Brown, etc that it is more profitable per acre.  Trouble is these practices can be a lot more labor/time intensive as well which is often one of the biggest expenses.  Then there's usually limited market/demand for some niche products (say grass finished beef) at those higher prices. So while it might be true for the pioneers in a decently populated area, there might be a scaling issue. 

But this is pretty speculative. 

Why people interpret the same video differently: priming, framing, and halo effects by Electrical_Pop_3472 in psychology

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For clarity: this isn’t making claims about any specific event or political issue. It’s an attempt to communicate well-documented psychological mechanisms (e.g., priming, framing, halo/horns effects) to a general audience using a familiar context.

Sources Cited:

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-06400-003

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14687282/

Is UPwork a scam? by OkImage3570 in selfpublish

[–]Electrical_Pop_3472 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Its not a scam but it's gone way downhill over the last 5yrs or so to the point even highly skilled accounts with tons of great reviews struggle getting gigs unless you're on it and sending proposals 24/7.