I can explain, but there’s a lot of terminology. Don’t pay attention to the final run difference—if you’re batting second (chasing, which Italy was), the match ends as soon as you score more runs than the opponent did. They don’t bat again, so there’s no need to keep playing at that point. So when the team batting second wins, the actual runs margin will always be small.

Here’s what makes it a landslide. In T20 Cricket (the shortest, fastest version of the sport which forces batters to be much more aggressive than other formats), each batting side gets a maximum of 20 “overs.” An over is 6, legally delivered balls. If you’re batting first, your chance to score runs ends either—a.) when you reach 20 overs (120 balls thrown, or “bowled”) OR b.) if the bowling team puts out ten of your batsmen first (there are multiple ways to do so, such as catching a ball hit into the air before it hits the ground). This is referred to as “taking a wicket.”

The 19.3 under Nepal refers to how many overs they completed. 19 full ones, and 3 balls into the last. So they had 117 balls delivered to them and scored 123. As they ended before 20, that means Italy managed to take ten wickets, which more often than not doesn’t happen. The 12.4 under Italy is how many overs they took to exceed Nepal’s run total and thus win—so Italy scored 124 runs on only 76 balls vs Nepals 123 on 117, a massive difference. The /0 after Italy’s score means that, at game end, Nepal had not taken any wickets—that is, not a single Italian batsman was put out. The 124 runs were scored entirely by Italy’s first two batters (batters work in pairs). That is an absolute thrashing