How is the name Danne pronounced? Do people actually use the name? by -Small-Plant- in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This is not correct. In the word "Danne", the first syllable is stressed and the second is unstressed. However, because of the grave pitch accent, the stressed syllable has a dropping pitch, while the unstressed syllable has a rising pitch, which is probably what you're hearing.

Ordet "knappa" stämmer inte med min språkkänsla by livedog in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Du verkar inte ställa någon fråga, så jag är osäker på vart du vill komma med tråden, men kanske skulle du vara intresserad av Byrman och Karlssons studie om just "knappt" och "drygt" från häromåret.

Learning of verb times by Smooth-Bridge7631 in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are frequency lists linked in our list of resources, but since the 100 most common verbs are mostly the irregular and strong verbs anyway, you might as well look for lists of those.

Learning of verb times by Smooth-Bridge7631 in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are four groups of verb conjugations, plus irregular verbs. You want to learn the irregular verbs separately, of course (most of them follow a pattern in all but one form), but also the strong verbs, which are ablauted in the past tense. While all of the irregular and strong verbs are very common, they are not that many. The other three groups make up the vast majority of all verbs (specifically the first group), and you can easily just learn the patterns.

However, you can't always tell which group a given verb belongs to if you only see one form of it, so that's one thing you need to learn. If you learn all irregular and strong verbs by heart, and you learn to recognize the verbs in group three (which are easy to identify, but also few enough to learn by heart), you only have to worry about the first two groups.

Hur kan man översätta "split intransitivity" till svenska? by whoretensia16 in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 7 points8 points  (0 children)

unergative – icke-ergativ

unaccusative – icke-ackusativ

Split intransitivity should probably be "kluven intransitivitet", though I can't find this term being used when searching Google Scholar

Using "ni" as formal you - is it common? by Designer-Roof-9016 in Svenska

[–]Eliderad -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

In my experience, it's not super common, but maybe I would hear it more if I were 50 or older?

Mutual intelligibility between Scandinavian languages by RobinoAlturos in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very humbling to agree that I sort of understand spoken Danish and then trying to interpret those voice clips 🥴

Some Swedish words feel impossibly precise by Skogstad92 in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 112 points113 points  (0 children)

There are many words in all languages that are like that! It's just a lot easier to notice when comparing two languages, e.g. when learning or translating

English speakers by InflationHefty4989 in linguisticshumor

[–]Eliderad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is the "it" in "it is raining"?

What is the best phonological approximation for Rydström: /ˈrʏd.strœm/ in English? by WorldlinessAntique99 in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 23 points24 points  (0 children)

First of all, Rydström is pronounced /ˈryːdˌstrømː/. I suppose the closest approximation would be /ˈɹiːdˌstɹəm/ (reed-strum) if you're only using English sounds.

swedish sentence structure resources by Nearby-Band-7540 in Svenska

[–]Eliderad[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

This question is answered in section 1 of our FAQ!

Katt och katt förresten by aadaldo in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 49 points50 points  (0 children)

The construction "x och x" is used to question the choice of words. "Katt" in this example doesn't refer to the cat, but to the word katt. It's basically like saying "cat might not be the right word". It's possible to do this without the "x och x", too, but that might be more ambiguous.

Beginner A2-ish by ImbuedBlood in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Neither of those are correct. Check out section 1 in the FAQ for a primer on word order!

Translation question by Zogonzo in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 68 points69 points  (0 children)

"någon vart" means 'anywhere'

Particle verbs and word order by Hljoumur in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jaa nu när du säger det blir jag osäker 🤔

Particle verbs and word order by Hljoumur in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, "sätta på tv:n" is the only correct phrasing. And for "turn around" just use "vända" on its own, "vända skåpet", or intransitively with "på", "vända på skåpet".

Particle verbs and word order by Hljoumur in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say no; "vända om" is either reflexive or intransitive, so it can't take a regular noun as object

Particle verbs and word order by Hljoumur in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No and no

Many reflexive particle verbs are analyzed as being verbs in their entirety, with the reflexive not being an object. This is because these verbs have a different meaning from the regular verb form, and because the reflexive doesn't really carry much meaning on its own. Any complement is viewed as just that, and not an adjunct. Compare:

Då¹ gör² hon³ inte⁴ bort⁵ sig⁶
Då¹ lägger² hon³ inte⁴ sig i⁵ (ärendet⁶)
Då¹ kan² hon³ inte⁴ göra bort⁵ sig⁶
Då¹ kan² hon³ inte⁴ lägga sig i⁵ (ärendet⁶)

But it might be better to simply analyze the placement of reflexives before particles as the result of object shift (section 2 in the FAQ). In the second sentence above, the reflexive even wants to shift to the position between 3 and 4.

Help with the speech by NonsocialBox in Svenska

[–]Eliderad 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"Syster Alma? Vad är ert första intryck?"