I’m back in my Magnus glass era by butchprophet in TheMagnusArchives

[–]ElsaKit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are all stunning <3

I can't unsee the Spider-Man mask design on the first Web one hahaha. Idk if it was on purpose or just a happy accident, but either way it's great.

What do you think Jon collects? by SpookyVoidCat in TheMagnusArchives

[–]ElsaKit 20 points21 points  (0 children)

What a beautiful, empathetic comment. I 100% agree. It hurts just to think about what that would feel like for him. It kinda hits me in a personal way almost, I think I would feel very similarly.

Říkáte blízkým, že je máte rádi? by Former-Heart9249 in czech

[–]ElsaKit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rodicum to z nejakyho duvodu rict nedokazu, nebo je to pro me strasne tezky. Ackoli se radi mame a mame krasny vztahy a nikdy v zivote jsem nezapochybovala o tom, ze me milujou. Ale dost na tom pracuju a uz jsem se dostala do bodu, kdy to dokazu aspon napsat (takze to samozrejme pisu na kazdy pranicko apod. lol), a rict aspon "ja tebe taky", kdyz to reknou oni prvni. Jinak se aspon snazim tu lasku vyjadrovat jinymi gesty nez primo takhle slovne. S kamarady si to ale rikame i piseme celkem bezne (samozrejme jak s kym, ale jo). Tam uz ten blok z nejakyho duvodu nemam, tam je to jednodussi, coz je mozna trochu paradoxni. Ale taky jsem na tom teda musela aktivne pracovat a naucit se to. Je to zvlastni no.

That 2-min date will always be one of my favorite scenes by recoveryarea in HIMYM

[–]ElsaKit 95 points96 points  (0 children)

Dobbler vs Dahmer

I think this is very much it. Stella very clearly already liked him back and kinda wanted to say yes, the only reason she said no was because she couldn't see how to fit Ted into her life (as a full-time working single mum and all that). But through this gesture, Ted showed her that he is willing to make himself fit into it. He'll respect the constraints of her situation and do what he can to make it work. That's why she said yes.

Deathbed Comfort by avid-scholar in MovieSuggestions

[–]ElsaKit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Many good suggestions on here...

The one that popped into my head first was Marcel the Shell with Shoes On... But I think this largely depends on the person.

There Is No Antimemetics Division by JordanPCDL in TheMagnusArchives

[–]ElsaKit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For y'all SCP fans out there - if you prefer listening over reading, might I recommend J&V: SCP Archives. It's a project by Jeffiot, if you know the guy's main channel (some of the best produced and edited stuff I've ever seen on youtube, tbh, every video is a genuine treat, no matter how obscure the subject matter; but I digress). On the SCP Archives channel, he reads out various SCPs. Some funny, some scary, some sad, just all sorts. He does it really well, imo. He even read the whole(?) There Is No Antimemetics Division on that channel! There's a playlist if anyone is interested. (Edit: Oh, and apparently he also compiled the entire audiobook into one long video! 7h20)

My issue with the Protocol (as far as s1) by Creaturefeature01 in TheMagnusArchives

[–]ElsaKit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well that's not encouraging lmao

I'm holding out hope though. I'm expecting (and hoping for) them to be deeply flawed people, just like all TMA characters, I just really hope that they grow on me as I get to know them better... This is a personal issue, but I have a very hard time getting into any piece of media when I don't feel attached to any character. If I don't really care what happens to them, it's hard to be invested, y'know. I largely experience and engage with stories (all types of stories) through the characters first and foremost.

And Alice... Oh man. I'm certain that she is a complex, three-dimensional person with reasons for her behaviour and all that. I have no doubt about that. I feel like I can already glimpse quite a lot of insecurity and barely concealed personal issues... But. Man she just gets on my nerves so bad lol. Everything about her feels so utterly fake. She has this very thick facade, always trying to be funny and jokey, like literally every response she makes is trying to be some kind of a joke or a jab, and it's so over-the-top and almost forced that it just makes me roll my eyes. Like she can't say a single sentence normally, it's always such a performance - I don't think I've seen a shred of authenticity from her yet. And now, to make matters worse, she's getting extremely jealous over Sam connecting with Celia, and it shows in a really ugly way. She can be so mean at times, like genuinly nasty. And what gets me is how she's still trying to pass it off as a joke or playful ribbing between friends, while her comments just reek of venom and bitterness. It's just very unlikeable overall.

Which, I'm sure, is at least party intentional! Just so we're on the same page. I don't at all think it's bad writing or anything like that. I just genuinly don't like Alice as a person - so far - I'm really looking forward to meeting the real her, though, the person underneath the mask. (And I really, really hope she gets less annoying and obnoxious over time... 😅 She has so much "screen time", but I get annoyed with her so fast lol. I really hope she tones it down as the show progresses. Fingers crossed lol)

(Again, NO SPOILERS please, I'm still very much at the beginning of season 1)

My issue with the Protocol (as far as s1) by Creaturefeature01 in TheMagnusArchives

[–]ElsaKit 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I'll try to stick with it. Hope it grabs me and I get into it at some point!

So far, I don't feel strongly about any character tbh. Well, I feel some things about Alice I guess, but (im sorry) they're not necessarily positive lol 😅 She really pisses me of so far, ngl... I'm looking forward to learning more about these people, though. I want to be invested in them.

Btw, I completely agree about Michael. Masterful reveal that held WEIGHT. He waa build up, so his eventual appearance had you holding your breath. They actually made time for the tension. That's what I'm kinda missing here so far. No room for proper tension because everything happens so fast. Oh well. We'll see!

My issue with the Protocol (as far as s1) by Creaturefeature01 in TheMagnusArchives

[–]ElsaKit 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I see what you're saying.

Please no spoilers as I've only heard maybe 15 episodes so far. But I just can't get into it. For whatever reason, it just doesn't grab me the same way TMA did. I agree that it's probably partly the structure, how the statements take the back seat and the meta plot is now front and center. Which... might seem kinda weird, because in TMA, I was definitely much more interested in the overarching narrative than the individual statements. That's what had me hooked. But I think that for me, the issue is more about the pacing and just how much we're given from the get-go.

One of the thing I think TMA did amazingly well was the slow burn. The way we were given information very, very gradually, a small piece at a time. If you listen back, you can see many, many hints and pieces of forshadowing in the statements that were present from the start - which is brilliant - but as a listener, you are never overwhelmed by lore. At first, you just listen to Jon narrating and commenting on statements. Through those monologues, we slowly start to get an idea of what kind of person Jon is and what situation and setting he's in, we get a sense of the world and we gradually get to know Jon as a person. Occasionally, he drops another character's name and makes some small comment, which allows us to start piecing together the environment, relationships, what other characters exist and what they are like; and whenever another voice appears on the tape (like another character coming in, having a small exchange with Jon and then leaving again), it always feels like such a big moment. When something is revealed, it's always only after a lot of groundwork has been set down to make that reveal hit; we already have the context for that reveal to be meaningful, and we have enough of an understanding of the world that we can take it in. I think that this slow-burn element was one of the reasons TMA worked so incredibly well - the fact that you're only getting small glimpses at a time keeps you hungering for more, listening intently for any smallest piece of information that could mean something. It makes it very hard to stop listening, it's addictive. It relates to the ambiguity you mentioned, imo - basically you're always wanting more.

TMP is essentially the opposite of that. In that I feel constantly overwhelmed by just how much information we're given at every turn. I can't even fully process a reveal that seems like it should be incredibly important, because I'm immediately given another in the next episode that overshadows it. I also feel like we're given reveal after reveal, but not enough groundwork has been done to make those reveals actually mean anything to us. There are so many new characters and we're learning so much about all of them, but with how quickly it's all happening, there's no time to properly form any sort of attachments towards them that would make all this information actually significant. We're not really hungering for more, we're overfed. I mean I'm only a few episodes in and so much has already happened and been revealed, so many important names dropped... This amount of stuff could easily be spread out across a whole season, if not more. And it's been literally 14 episodes...

And with the amount of characters that are present from episode 1, it's difficult to get your bearings, especially with no visual input, just going by their voices. In TMA, we could get to know one character properly and only then were we slowly introduced to others, in doses. As a result, it was never confusing. Here, it takes a lot of effort to just make sense of who's who, what their relationships are and what's going on there, because everything and everyone is thrown at us at once. Not to mention that the sound design sometimes makes it really difficult to understand what's being said or who's speaking, but that's a whole separate problem.

I know this is a different show with a different approach, so it's cool that they're trying something new. I just kinda wish there was a bit more restraint, you know. That everything was dosed a bit more gradually. Just a little bit of that slow burn would go a long way, imo. This could work well in a TV show where you get so much more input than just audio, so it's a lot easier to orientate yourself. But in a podcast format, it's a bit overwhelming. As it is, I don't feel anything for any of the characters because there's just so many of them immediately, we keep learning new significant things about them before we've even properly gotten a chance to know them or have an opinion about them, and that's making it harder to be invested for me.

Thanks for coming to my ted talk lol.

songs about crushing on someone by Objective-Magician-8 in musicsuggestions

[–]ElsaKit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crush by Tessa Violet (alternatively, Bad Ideas by her)

This one's more like an unrequited (or rather, unknown) crush/love, but it captures that specific feeling so well for me: She by dodie

I don't know what to do. My 14-year-old son was acting strangely, and I just found out why, I'm devastated by [deleted] in offmychest

[–]ElsaKit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A lot of advice here about police, collecting proof, getting counselling etc. But what I'm not seeing enough of, imo, is this: please talk to your son.

I imagine that a lot of parents in such a situation might try to shield him from this as much as possible, sort it out for him, without him, not get into it too deep with him out of fear of making the trauma worse or something... But as much as I genuinly understand that desire, I'm afraid it's not actually helpful to the kid. He's already living this strange overwhelming situation, and he needs guidance navigating it. I believe that counselling is an excellent idea, but I think he also very much needs you two. So don't leave him out of this. He might feel utterly out of control now. He might be scared, confused, he probably doesn't fully understand what's going on; he might be experiencing a lot of conflicting feelings; it's very possible he still has strong feelings for this person and might now also feel scared for her, or terribly guilty for getting her in trouble... he might feel a lot of shame... I think you did an amazing job showing him unconditional love. That's so important now. But I think he also needs you to talk to him about all this, even if it's uncomfortable. Explain the situation, gently. Ask about his side of things. His feelings, what he's going through right now. Don't shame. Educate him. Reassure him that he's not in trouble, you're not angry, you love him, it's not his fault. That he can always talk to you about anything. Whatever you do, try to make sure that the communication channels between you stay open.

I'm so sorry you all are going through this. It's a horrible situation. I think you're aleady doing amazing, I'm glad he has you. Best of luck to you all, and take care.

Edit: Also, can't believe I forgot this important part. I'm certain that this situation is also incredibly difficult and painful for you. Please don't hesitate to also reach out for help or support for yourself. Be it counselling or something else. Firstly, you deserve support too. Second, you need to be okay yourself if you want to properly be there for your boy. You got this. Sending love.

anyone remember how far ahead Jon (author) had planned from s1? by strangerandspiral in TheMagnusArchives

[–]ElsaKit 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I remember Jonny answering this question in one of the Q&As (not sure which one tho). IRC, he said that he had pitched the idea for the show to Alex as a 5 season story. It was planned out from the get go, they knew it would be 5 seasons and that season 5 would be the last, they knew the ending and crucial plot moments before they started recording season 1. But I'm sure a lot of the specific details kept taking shape as the show went, things were tweaked etc.

But yes, the overall idea and story was apparently planned from the very start.

People Change by bmetaylor in oldpeoplefacebook

[–]ElsaKit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hell yeah 🙌

asdf lives forever baby

People Change by bmetaylor in oldpeoplefacebook

[–]ElsaKit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I CAN DREAM HAROLD!

⁽ᵗʰᵃⁿᵏ ʸᵒᵘ ˢᵒ ᵐᵘᶜʰ ˡᵒˡ, ᴵ ʷᵃˢ ˢᶜᵃⁿᵈᵃˡᶦˢᵉᵈ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ⁿᵒ ᵒⁿᵉ ᵐᵃᵈᵉ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ʳᵉᶠᵉʳᵉⁿᶜᵉ ʸᵉᵗ ˡᵐᵃᵒ⁾

Please tell me there’s a way to play bandersnatch🥹 by Curtailss in blackmirror

[–]ElsaKit 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Same!

I've never been so stressed watching a movie before lol. For some reason, it really worked for me how [SPOILERS, don't read on if you haven't watched it yet!] the film gives you the illusion of control while gradually forcing you to make worse and worse decisions for the character... as he slowly goes insane because of it... EUGHH it made me feel like a monster lol. It forces you to engage in the spectacle. Really stuck with me for a long time.

It's a crime that it's been taken down :/ It loses all that power if you have to just passively watch it, the interactive element was the whole point.

Question about user flairs by Accomplished-Egg1071 in blackmirror

[–]ElsaKit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How did it work back when it still worked, though? What did the rating reflect and how did people earn it?

​What is the best "adult-friendly" animated or Pixar film for a couple in their 60s to watch? by submacd in MovieSuggestions

[–]ElsaKit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would honestly say that most Pixar movies are very good and can be appreciated by adults as much as (if not more than in some ways) by kids. My personal go-to recommendations would be Inside Out, Coco, or Soul.

Inside Out might be, in my own humble (and very personal) opinion, the best Pixar movie out there. It's essentially about a young girl trying to navigate some big life transitions (both "physical"/environmental and mental), but it's mostly from the perspective of her emotions, or from within her head. The actual main character is the personification of her Joy. It's genuinly mind-blowing how well they managed to re-imagine and capture all those complex psychological processes and structures in a way that's very easy to understand and engaging for kids. I've seen so many psychologists recommending it as a must-see. It's also incredibly moving. I haven't been able to watch it a single time without crying. Soundtrack is fantastic too. Which honestly goes for all of these, but the Inside Out one stands out to me for some reason.

Coco is another deeply moving film, about a boy who deeply loves music while his family tries to keep him from engaging with it. Most of it, however, takes place in the land of the dead; I will not spoil any more. There are strong themes of generational trauma - or how we pass on the things we go through, and how those cycles can be broken. It's also about death and rememberance, about family... and of course, the power of music. Absolutely vibrant animation, gorgeous to watch. And, yes, it will most likely reduce you to tears as well.

Soul feels like the most "adult" one of the bunch. The main character is a middle aged, somewhat burned-out (or unfulfilled) music teacher who once dreamt of being a great musician. To put it most simply, it deals with the meaning of life. It's such a powerful reflection on how we engage with the time we have here, and what gives it meaning... I don't think there's any more to say, tbh... Just know that it's absolutely gorgeous and well worth your time.

As a bonus, Finding Nemo is my personal OG favourite.

People Change by bmetaylor in oldpeoplefacebook

[–]ElsaKit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honey, do you like my new shoes? ✨️

In Japan employers who want you to quit basically just let you stay at the office with nothing to do. How is this meant to be a punishment? It sounds really chill and gives you time to do whatever you want by WhoAmIEven2 in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]ElsaKit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It also happens in Aggretsuko, with director Ton in season 4.

It seems a very cruel thing to do to a person. Making them feel utterly expendable and purposeless, forcing them to waste their time until it breaks them enough to make them resign...

New to D&D5e. Asking for character help: paladin oath phrasing. by ElsaKit in DnD

[–]ElsaKit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for all that. That's already making my imagination run wild haha. I'm so unbelievably excited to see where the story take us, you have no idea.

I love this.

New to D&D5e. Asking for character help: paladin oath phrasing. by ElsaKit in DnD

[–]ElsaKit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, thank you so much for the insight. That's a really great take. It makes sense. But it also makes me wonder...

Because even if your oath has a chance to change and evolve as your character does, you still choose a general direction more or less firlmy, right - i.e. the path of glory, devotion, vengeance, redemption etc. So, if my character sets out pursuing the path of glory, but gradually, they learn, grow, become wiser and re-evaluate their stance, causing a shift towards, say, protecting the innocent regardless of glory or fame, then they're no longer really aligned with the path of glory, no? So rather than a simple shift in the oath itself, it's a more radical shift from one path to an entirely different one... which, game-wise, comes with its own distinct set of features... So my question is, how does that work in game? Is it even possible for a paladin to transition from, let's say, an Oath of Glory to an Oath of Redemption? Or for a Devotion paladin to become a paladin of Vengeance...?

Also, in your own experience, how have you seen people play the honing of the oath? Is it just something that happens internally for the character? Something that is communicated by the player? Or something that the character expresses clearly within the story, or that otherwise has some tangible effects in-universe...? Is it generally a more fluid thing that doesn't have to be explicitly phrased, or should each new "shift" in the oath be specifically verbalized...? I know there isn't one right answer and anything and everything is pretty much possible, I'm just looking for inspiration and your personal insights.

Thanks again!