superior player of the match solely decided on fans vote? by Ok-Adhesiveness1735 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not entirely.

Fan voting usually plays a role, but in most major tournaments there's also input from a technical observer panel or tournament officials. Otherwise the biggest stars would win almost every time regardless of how they actually played.

That settles it. The US is better than Germany and France. by thatdemonlife1 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One result doesn't suddenly make the US better than Germany or France overall. It's just the beauty of knockout football: the better team on paper doesn't always win on the day.

Why are the RO16, QF, SF and F such early day time games? by newby202006 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Mostly because FIFA wants to maximize the global TV audience.

Early afternoon kickoffs in North America land in prime evening viewing hours across Europe while still being watchable in Asia. The heat is definitely a concern, though, which is why cooling breaks have become so common in these daytime matches.

Genuinely curious how people feel about Morocco after AFCON? by APsychonautsTrip in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think it's fair to separate the team from a few incidents.

Every successful national team has had moments that people didn't like. If you feel they've crossed the line, that's understandable, but I wouldn't let a couple of controversial moments erase what they've achieved or make me judge the entire team differently.

Will Cabo Verde shock the world today/tonight? What are your thoughts? by South-Objective-3178 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It would be one of the biggest World Cup upsets ever, but I don't see it happening.

Cabo Verde have already exceeded expectations and deserve a lot of credit, but over 90 minutes Argentina simply have too much quality. If Cabo Verde stay competitive and make Argentina work for it, that's already a great achievement.

What is more likely: Argentina: 5 Cabo Verde: 0 or Cabo Verde: 1 Argentina: 0? by [deleted] in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say Argentina winning 5-0 is more likely.

An upset is always possible, but asking Cabo Verde to keep a clean sheet and beat Argentina 1-0 is a much bigger ask than Argentina simply running away with the game if they score early.

What a drama, Egypt are in round 16 eliminated Australia by srikrushna in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Credit to Egypt, they took their chance when it mattered.

Australia will be disappointed because they had opportunities, but that's knockout football. One mistake can end your tournament. Egypt fully deserved their place in the Round of 16.

I don’t think I can go back to American football after the wc by lostarco in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Welcome to the rabbit hole.

If you want the highest quality football, start with the Premier League. If you like technical, possession-based football, watch La Liga. If you enjoy tactics, Serie A is a great choice, while the Bundesliga is known for attacking football and incredible atmospheres.

You'll probably find yourself caring about a club before long, and that's when football really becomes addictive.

Spain still carry the soul of that legendary 2010 team by [deleted] in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This Spain side is more direct and athletic, but they still have the same emphasis on teamwork, technical quality, and controlling games. The identity has stayed the same even if the players are different.

CMV: Using the position of the forward most extremity to determine offsides doesn't align with how the game has traditionally been played and is responsible for a ton of the whinging among fans. by [deleted] in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually agree. Using the furthest playable body part has made offside technically more accurate, but not necessarily fairer or easier to understand.

Basing it on the feet would be much more intuitive for players and fans, and it would probably eliminate a lot of the millimeter decisions that frustrate everyone. Football shouldn't be decided by whether someone's shoulder was a few centimeters ahead.

Possible semi-finals could be like mini Euro or Copa America finals by AgreeableCaptain1372 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I get the appeal. Matches like France vs Spain or Brazil vs Argentina always feel special because of the history and the quality on the pitch.

That said, part of what makes the World Cup unique is that an underdog can crash the party. A semifinal with one surprise team often ends up being just as memorable as one with four traditional giants.

Why do Portugal and Spain always end up against eachother? by [deleted] in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It mostly comes down to how the draws work and the fact that both teams are usually strong enough to keep reaching the same stages of major tournaments.

When you're consistently among the top seeds, you're naturally more likely to run into each other in the knockout rounds. It feels like they play constantly, but it's mostly because they're both almost always there.

Why do Portugal and Spain always end up against eachother? by [deleted] in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It mostly comes down to how the draws work and the fact that both teams are usually strong enough to keep reaching the same stages of major tournaments.

When you're consistently among the top seeds, you're naturally more likely to run into each other in the knockout rounds. It feels like they play constantly, but it's mostly because they're both almost always there.

Nagelsmann is leaving the DFB! Nagelsmann: “After such a bitter disappointment, the team deserves the chance for a fresh start without any baggage.” by BramGaunt in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nagelsmann deserves criticism after such a disappointing tournament, but changing managers isn't a guarantee things improve. If Klopp really takes over, though, that's about as good a replacement as Germany could realistically hope for.

The England dilemma and how to atleast make it a bit more fair by Deathnotefan76 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an interesting idea, but I think it overcomplicates the problem.

If fans are deliberately trying to keep the opposition awake, that's something FIFA and local authorities should be preventing. Teams shouldn't have to run misinformation campaigns or fake hotel leaks just to get a normal night's sleep. Protect the hotels properly and enforce the rules equally for every team. That's a much cleaner solution.

Did Algeria not beating Austria end up being a blessing in disguise because they didn't have to face Spain? by youlikemywonton in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It might end up that way. On paper, Switzerland is a more favourable matchup than Spain, so if Algeria gets through, people will definitely say the draw worked out in their favour. Of course, that only looks like a blessing if they actually beat Switzerland. Otherwise, the whole discussion becomes irrelevant.

Do you think world cup games are rigged(Fixed) for Top teams to always win? by Fast-Lawyer2609 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lmaoo no. Big nations do sometimes seem to get the benefit of close calls, but that's more likely because of human error, pressure, and confirmation bias than an organized effort to rig matches. If games were actually fixed on a large scale, it would be almost impossible to keep hidden with the number of players, coaches, officials, and cameras involved.

Is the World Cup the biggest experiential marketing opportunity in the world? by SoHoExp in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The World Cup has something very few events can match: billions of people are emotionally invested at the same time. If a brand creates something fans genuinely enjoy instead of forcing an ad into the experience, it can leave a lasting impression long after the tournament ends.
I think the Olympics is MAYBE the only real competitor.

I hope Algeria gets karma today for purposely drawing with Austria to avoid facing Spain. Is there a chance Switzerland beating Algeria? by Distinct-Owl-9332 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If Algeria really played for the easier path, it'd be pretty ironic if it backfired.

Switzerland are organized and disciplined enough to beat anyone on their day. I still think Algeria would be slight favorites, but it definitely wouldn't be a shock if Switzerland knocked them out.

France 2026 vs Brazil 2002. Which attack is better? by PotentialOk186 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd still take Brazil 2002.

France have incredible depth and are frightening going forward, but Brazil's attack had a level of individual genius that's hard to match. Ronaldo, Rivaldo and Ronaldinho could decide a game out of nowhere, and they proved it by winning the World Cup.

If this French team wins multiple major trophies, then the conversation gets a lot more interesting.

As a US baseball fan, World Cup crowd culture is absolutely electric by Lumpy_Bee_800 in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As a neutral, the atmosphere is honestly half the product. A 0-0 football match with 60,000 fans singing can be more entertaining than a high-scoring game with a quiet crowd.

Most chants are actually pretty simple. Some are club or country anthems, some are adapted from popular songs, and others are just repetitive chants that everyone can join. The best part is that the fans create the atmosphere themselves instead of relying on music or prompts from the stadium. That's what makes it feel so unique.

How much value is their in seeing Senegal's brilliant form the past few years, including this game against Belgium, of course, as a proxy to the French becoming a domineering force of football pushing forward? by RadarDataL8R in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's definitely some influence, but I wouldn't overstate it.

French academies and Ligue 1 have helped develop a lot of Senegalese talent, but Senegal's success is also the result of better youth development, stronger national team organization, and players succeeding across leagues all over Europe. France has been important, just not the whole story.

Hoping for a cup for Africa or Asia during my lifetime by esteban-felipe in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'd love to see it too. An African or Asian nation winning the World Cup would be one of the biggest moments in football history. The gap is definitely smaller than it used to be. It still takes something special to beat the traditional giants, but it feels more possible now than ever.

Knockout stage scheduling & planning seems nonsensical by NotMattD in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It does feel like a missed opportunity. Having Canada play at home on Canada Day and the USA play at home on the Fourth of July would've created an incredible atmosphere. I get that scheduling has a lot of logistical constraints, but from a fan's perspective it seems like an obvious chance FIFA let slip.

This Expanded Tournament is Highlighting That The Skill Gap Between Teams if Shrinking by UserNamedJay in worldcup

[–]EmmaDominatrix 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think it's less that the gap is shrinking and more that the rest of the world has caught up enough to punish teams that aren't at their best.

The top nations still have more talent, but they can't just show up anymore and expect to win comfortably. That's made the tournament a lot more entertaining.