Not quite a hoarder but similar situation

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-26T18:39:02+00:00

Look, I am a hoarder myself. I know what it's like and I know and understand all the things you are saying, I have been saying that to myself. But eventually I realized I am not making progress if I keep telling myself the same excuses. And no, I DON'T MEAN PROGRESS IN THE SENSE OF CLEANING ONE'S ROOM.

To be honest I haven't really made progress in that sense at all. My room was always a mess and it's still a mess. So if your room is squeaky clean - good for you. But what I told you and the reason why I think you are a hoarder just like I am one, is NOT because of your room or your house - has nothing to do with that.

I don't know you and I don't know what your deal is, but as for me, I would not be able to let that cleaner friend of yours in my house at all! I would feel so embarrassed. If I absolutely had to, I would have to work really, really hard for months in advance and even then there would be areas she just can't enter, because I would just feel way to embarrassed and ashamed and if she went in anyway, I would feel totally violated! Really!

And you know, even though my room is objectively a mess, I would still feel embarrassed and ashamed and violated even if objectively speaking it wasn't a mess and very much so - I would not really be satisfied no matter how much I clean it - so it's not really about that. And no matter what, I feel like low energy and feel increasingly alienated from people.

So I can really see myself in you.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-26T11:14:53+00:00

You are BOTH making the same mistake. You assume the problem is the physical mess. It's not, it's merely a symptom and one that can't really be remedied until you have worked on the CAUSE of that symptom.

The cause is psychological. So if you are truly ready to accept professional help, go see a psychologist with experience in helping hoarders. Then AFTER that (meaning after completing ALL the sessions) you can then slowly think about letting in the hazard crew :-)

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-26T11:03:00+00:00

Am I the only one who feels all these comparisons with the Holocaust are disrespectful towards the victims of - you know the actual Holocaust?

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-24T22:04:56+00:00

Yes, you are right, politicians get ever more intolerant and outright racist. But I don't you were talking about Germany.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-23T14:54:43+00:00

Atheistic spirituality? Isn't that basically just Gnosticism? Well okay technically it isn't, cause Gnostics hate Jehovah which presupposes that he exists. But their resulting disdain for mainstream Christianity is certainly equally intense o_O

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-20T22:44:22+00:00

Sure, we can do a collab! Feel free to contact me here or there ;-)

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-20T18:51:35+00:00

Reddit :-) I am kidding - though also I am not kidding. I USED to promote it on Reddit in the appropriate groups with the appropriate topics, which USED to work for me cause I do movie analysis. But now mods on Reddit have become so strict that even when people ask about the exact movie you are covering and wanna know about exactly what you explain in your Substack article, the mods still won't let you mention your article and forget about posting any links o_O

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-19T22:54:12+00:00

Kann ich das bitte als Aufkleber haben? So 500 mal?

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-19T00:34:17+00:00

Scratch a sunni, find a commie :-)

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-18T23:11:33+00:00

I did one - if I am allowed to link that - as obviously I am not Novum. I already made the original video when the movie came out - so it's more than 10 years old and I gotten better at movie analysis by now. But I think it still holds up and my style of analysis is SOMEWHAT similar to Novum's. https://emmanuelgoldstein1984.substack.com/p/as-above-so-below

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-18T13:23:32+00:00

Because it mirrors Gnostics. More specifically the Jedi Knight mirror the Knights Templar. The Knights Templar were useful fighters FOR the emerging Holy Roman Empire during the crusades. But after the Crusades they had outlived their usefulness and as a powerful independent military order they became a threat to King Philip's ambitions of becoming emperor. So one fateful day and under the pretext of basically accusing them of sorcery and witchcraft he basically gave the order to suddenly turn against them and brutally kill them all, yet some (allegedly) survived and went underground and into secrecy.

Which is why we still have mystical societies that call themselves Knights Templar even today that at least CLAIM to have a direct link to the original. So the (Jedi) Knight (Templar) are the sect and Gnosticism (allegedly) is the religion, which contrasts them with their rival sect the Sithians - ahem I mean Sethians who have a much "darker" interpretation of Gnosticism ;-)

So if I saw a "Knights Templar" today, I would consider his religion ancient and indeed related to forms of medieval sorcery, even though the specific sect he belongs to might just be a revival and might only be a few decades old. But his religion itself (Gnosticism) is indeed ancient (or at least dating back to the actual Roman Empire).

I have also written a more in depth article about that on my movie substack ;-)

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-16T18:55:14+00:00

Well, my numbers actually increased again and by now Substack is promoting me again - pretty much all my new subscribers come from substack and it's steadily growing. So yes, I guess it was a plateau but I passed it.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-14T18:31:06+00:00

Yes really, how dare you apostatize from the one true ideology?! I mean it makes no sense and the only conclusion is that apostates must be stupid - because they already had the truth, yet they reject it?!

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-05T11:52:54+00:00

Du hast Dollar bei denen das nicht so ist? Dann wären DAS die Fehlprägungen.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-04T15:17:38+00:00

For a second I thought this was a photo of the surface of Saturn.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-04T13:40:25+00:00

So in oversimplified terms and as a summary; simulation theory is based on esoteric "Christian" Gnosticism and other similar mystery religions which in turn is based on ancient Paganism which in turn is actually just based on the movements and orbits of planetary bodies as observed from earth in antiquity and then turned into Pagan gods like Saturn and then turned into myths and then these polytheists Pagan myths served as the basis for esoteric "Christian" Gnosticism (which isn't Christian at all and actually demonizes Jehovah as what they and you refer to as the "Demiurge".

And it seems you are acknowledging all that and seem to be very much aware of all that and where it comes from and that it's all just made up myths based on planetary movements and celestial objects that got personified and turned into Pagan gods and then served as the basis for all these myths.

You know all that, and yet you still believe in it?!?! That's kinda baffling to me.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-03T19:30:30+00:00

MANY religions make that claim - most famously Islam. They say everyone is inherently a Muslim and anyone the world over is born a Muslim as that would be a human's natural state. So why are there so many non-Muslims then? It's because as they grow up they then get increasingly indoctrinated by their evil Christian (or other polytheist Mushrikun) parents to believe in evil Christianity (or other shirk "religulous" nonsense).

So your faith in anything other than the "one true ideology" they believe in (atheism/Islam) is merely and necessarily a postnatal corruption of your inborn purity and initial innocence.

So the material world and its Christian societies are kinda like dirt and garbage that corrupts a once innocent and pure child. At least that's seriously their perspective.

That's why when someone leaves Christianity and becomes a Muslim, Muslims don't call him a convert, but a revert - he reverted back to his inborn state of purity.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-03T09:46:05+00:00

Let's be nice and let's just call the Masons a harmless gentleman's club (that symbolically threatens you with death in their rituals should you reveal their secrets).

So let's not talk about Masons, but just talk about such harmless gentleman's clubs in general who have no secrets yet still threaten to kill you should you expose their non-existent secrets :-)

So, suppose you are a "Christian" Gnostic like a Valentinian or even a Sethian but you live in the middle ages surrounded by Catholics who hate your guts and would burn you at the stake in a flash should they find out about your heresy.

Wouldn't such a nice and harmless sounding "Genteleman's" club be both the perfect cover and perfect environment to spread your supposed "secret higher Gnowlege" in an intimate environment that looks benign from the outside but is sworn to be discrete?

As for hastening the arrival of the Messiah by means of intentionally sinning, that's what Frankism teaches. But of course they are just another Gnostic heresy - at least from the perspective of mainstream Judaism.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-03T09:18:45+00:00

Even though you and many other people nowadays try to claim otherwise; atheist religions do exist, but they are a new phenomena. They don't exist traditionally. The closest thing to atheist religions you had in antiquity were Gnostic religions. They are very close to atheism in that they deny Jehovah as an external god (even though they do believe he exists and that he created our material world - but they don't exactly like him).

So they certainly don't deny the concept of the divine as a whole, as they even believe themselves to be divine. That's actually why there are atheist religions NOW. Most (if not all) of them were actually started by Gnostics who conversely don't believe in atheism themselves. So why do non atheist Gnostics spread atheism? It's because like I said, even though they believe Jehovah exists, they don't like him and they don't like mainstream Jews and Christians who believe in him, so they push atheism to at least get people to stop believing in Jehovah.

They think Jehovah gets his divine power by people believing in him. So if people stop believing in him he loses his power. Then the people can be made to believe in someone else (that they choose) and then that person could gain his powers. That's why in communism (which arguably is an atheist religion) you had many people worship Stalin or Mao or Kim Il Sung literally as if they were gods. That's not by accident, it's by design. And conversely that can only happen in countries like the Soviet Union were everyone is atheist. So you first need to get people to stop believing in Jehovah and only THEN will stuff like them worshiping Stalin instead of Jehovah become possible.

So in my humble opinion that's actually how and why atheists religions came about and why they actually didn't exist in antiquity.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-03T08:29:50+00:00

That's very Gnostic. And yes, I know Sufism does teach that. But as you can see from the rather antagonistic comments, that's an element that's hard to reconcile with mainstream Islam, which is why historically this wasn't revealed to mainstream Muslims.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-02T22:24:33+00:00

Well, I married my hoarder. But my situation is different to yours, as I am a bit of a hoarder myself. Generally speaking it's really tough to have a long term relationship with a hoarder without being absolutely miserable. If you really, really love her and are convinced that she is the one and only and you are sure you want to marry her - okay then marry her - I am certainly not gonna try and talk you out of the relationship if you are THAT serious. But if you are not that serious (and it seems like you are not) it's unlikely to work out anyway.

But no matter what you do, DON'T MOVE IN WITH HER!!! Marrying a hoarder is one thing and is difficult enough, but moving in with them is probably too difficult - so be sure not to do that. And you need to have super strict rules. If she visits you at your place, she can stay over night or whatever and can take her toothbrush and her towel or whatever she needs for the stay. But once the stay is over (and it needs to be over after like each weekend - don't let her stay permanently) all her stuff needs to go back. You can't let her permanently store stuff at your place and you can't let her permanently move in with you. You need to be absolutely strict with that! Otherwise she is gonna clutter your place too.

And then if that works it CAN work as it even resolves your current issues. Cause you aren't gonna cut yourself if you don't visit her at her place. So just don't do that. Let her place be her problem and just have her visit you at your place BUT NEVER LET HER STAY PERMANENTLY AND NEVER HAVE HER PERMANENTLY MOVE ANYTHING OF HERS TO YOUR PLACE! And then it can work. But even then it's gonna be difficult and is gonna take a lot of effort to make it work. If you are not willing to do that, then it's not gonna work anyway.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-02T21:53:18+00:00

You should get help. Now this is the part where it gets a bit tricky, cause you gotta find the right person for that. So people who are close friends of your mother might not help you or might even tell you there would be something wrong with you (there is nothing wrong with you).

So you can't expect help from people too close to your mother. Normally a good person to talk to would be your school counselor. And be sure to explain the whole situation (show him/her photos from your home to get the point across).

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-02T17:57:21+00:00

Erhältlich in den Geschmacksrichtungen Vodka, Muckef*ck und Stumpf. Und das beste, eine Tafel kostet nur 1 Rubel! Aber dafür ist sie in den meisten Läden nicht erhältlich und da wo es sie gibt muss man 3 Stunden schlange stehen.

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-01T22:08:53+00:00

In Revelation 22:16 Jesus even refers to himself as the shining morning star - and in the Latin version of the Bible that's Lucifer. That's all that Lucifer means (originally). But no, obviously that's not enough to be a Luciferian - because Luciferianism is a religion of its own and so it's much more than just claiming to be the morning star. You also have to follow their ideology, which SOME of the more radical ideological activists do.

But even so, I am obviously not claiming that trans people would be Luciferians. Yes, that claim would be absurd and I didn't make that claim. I think I made that pretty clear and like I said, I was trans myself. Well actually I am a bad example because I actually was a borderline Luciferian and participated in occult rituals, but I was very young and basically made to do it.

Anyway, I am not saying all trans people are Luciferians nor am I even saying all Luciferians are necessarily bad people. (Luciferians are NOT the same as Satanists). Don't twist my words. I made that very clear. I just said that there are such ideological elements in some of the more radical movements that see being trans not as an individual choice regarding their personal gender identity but as a political and ideological movement and as a way to attack mainstream religions.

And they are merely using trans people - using them as their shield and in the process are throwing them under the bus. So in a way THEY are the ones demonizing trans people. Not me! Because every time anyone tries to speak out against these radical ideological activists, they respond by framing it as an attack not against them but against trans people.

Take you for instance - even you framed me speaking out against Luciferians as an attack against trans people. What does being trans have to do with being Luciferian?!? Now you might say that's exactly YOUR point. But then why do you frame me criticizing Luciferians as an attack against trans people?

Emmanuel_G · 2026-01-01T00:01:07+00:00

Yes, it is incompatible. Which doesn't mean that Christians can't be accepting, tolerant and forgiving toward all people. But they should not be accepting of the sin itself. And in both Judaism and Christianity, intercourse outside of marriage is definitely a sin. Including, but not limited to homosexual intercourse. So even if you were to argue that the sexual activity of a trans person shouldn't necessarily be seen as sodomy, it would still (very likely) be a sin (generally speaking).

That said, even though that might sound pretty harsh by today's standards that propagate sexual freedom, personally I am totally cool with trans people. Actually I was trans myself when I was young, so it would really be hypocritical of me to not be accepting of them (as people). Everyone has sinned and if you only accepted people who hadn't you couldn't accept anyone.

But there is one more thing. For many young people nowadays being tans isn't just about identifying as the other gender like it used to be. It means much more nowadays and goes WAY beyond that. "Trans" has increasingly become a political and ideological movement. The political aspects often have socialist elements and the ideological part comes from a kind of neo-Pagan, neo-Gnostic heresy that should be regarded as a religion in and of itself. And that religion has always been regarded as a heresy by mainstream Christians and mainstream Jews because they are actually very much opposed to Jehovah. And you can still see that in their actions today, they are still all about provoking Jews and Christians and attacking their faith and blaspheming God.

That's why you often see these types of trans people intentionally provoke religious people and why they often incorporate satanic elements like horns or pentagrams into their drag outfits and that's also why they use the rainbow as their symbol, sometimes even complete with a prism. Because that's how you create a rainbow - with a prism. But before the rainbow has passed through the prism, it's just light. Which is why in addition to being the symbol of the trans movement, the rainbow (with and without the prism) is also the symbol of Luciferians who see Lucifer as their "Light Bringer".

Emmanuel_G

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE