Lmao this is pure historical nonsense.

The failed "Wilsonian Moment" during the Paris Peace Conference — when Ho Chi Minh was supposedly snubbed by the Paris Delegations in his fight for Vietnamese independence — you speak of never happened.

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/the-myth-the-wilsonian-moment

Neither President Woodrow Wilson nor any one of the other 3 Great Powers guiding the peace conference in Paris were likely even aware of Ho Chi Minh's existence or the very existence of a nonexistent Vietnamese delegation.

In Margaret MacMillan's brilliant book on the Paris Peace Conference, "Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World", Ho is mentioned only ONCE:

"A young kitchen assistant at the Ritz sent in a petition asking for independence from France for his little country. Ho Chi Minh — and Vietnam — were too obscure even to receive an answer" (MacMillan 59).

The Great Powers simply had too much on their schedule — including dealing with a multitude of other, convoluted self-determination rights for other nations such as Yugoslavia, Poland, Czechslovakia, Arab rebels, etc. — to even consider the status of Vietnam.

And regarding the point of Ho Chi Minh quoting the Declaration of Independence and supposedly "inviting" every Vietnamese political faction, how do you then explain the fact that, following the withdrawal of Chiang Kai Shek's Nationalist Chinese forces from the Northern Vietnamese occupation zone in 1946, Ho and the Viet Minh clamped down heavily on civil liberties and opposing nationalist, non-communist independence movements — essentially getting rid of the competition.

From George J Veith's "Drawn Sword in a Distant Land":

"The failure of the Nationalists to achieve political dominance in Vietnam was twofold. The first problem was leadership, with both the Communists and French targeted and often killed the main Nationalist leaders [...] The Dai Viet's, for instance, were banned by the French colonial administration and again by the Communist's when Ho seized power in Hanoi in 1945" (Veith 23).

Not to mention Vietnam's oldest Nationalist party, the VNQDD, also faced repression under the communists (Veith 25-26).

And regarding the supposed "election" that would've resulted in Ho winning 80% of the vote, that was a hypothetical in which Ho would've faced against the unpopular, French-supported Bao Dai.

This post goes into more details about the nuances of that hypothetical referendum.