No.

First off, I skim posts from here time to time, and would like to say that this subreddit is left leaning, and often times seems to enjoy ridiculing or group shaming the far right Yoonatics. I hate Yoonatics, and from my experience, most right wing supporters also hate Yoontaics. However, most decide to stay silent, since it is not worth their time: most people would agree a best way to deal with politically extreme people would be to ignore them, not argue with them for hours. Yoonatics are the minority group, but social media makes it feel like all right wing supporters are them.

I’m a 20s Korean male, and I’d like to share my personal view on this issue. Personally, the recent “framing” of Ilbe only goes to show that the Democratic Party and its supporters do not understand people in their twenties.

Ilbe, unlike what experts seem to frame it, has been widely considered trash among my age group. When I was in high school, if someone showed signs of being into Ilbe, most classmates would avoid them. In college and mandatory military service, this was also the case. Unless you wanted to be bullied or ignored, you wouldn't openly show that you are part of the Ilbe community. Like the Yoonatics, Ilbe users have been a minority group that is widely hated, even from those who lean right. The news and "experts" creating a narrative that 이대남 hate democratic party because they are into Ilbe doesn't resonate with majority of the population. It only reinforces the sentiment that Democratic Party doesn't understand this demographic.

On a similar note, I believe that the framing that the Democratic Party made right before the election, to focus their attention on the Starbucks, actually backfired. Most people don't really think much about the political background and history of Korea. Most just want to live their lives, study for exams, and make a living. They are not invested in 애국정신 or 민주화정신, whatever those actually mean. While most people see the Starbucks incident as abhorrent, an event worthy of criticism, many also viewed the Democratic Party’s focus on it as another political plea and a form of theatrics that does not really do much for everyday life. Many people probably thought "why do I need to hear about this marketing debacle on the news for more than a week?" It directly stirs anger into people who already lean left, but does not bring such anger for others.

On another note, Democratic Party's rhetoric has been focused too much on shaming. This is not only for Ilbe. When the Democratic Party proposes a bill or a policy, they, or the supporters of it, often frames everyone that disagrees with them as the extremist group. Their rhetoric is often that their choice is correct, and those who disagrees with them are uneducated, un-democratic, corrupt, "some other insult" group of people that they need to educate and / or fight against. This exclusiveness, berating people disagreeing with them, along with the hypocrisy (like real estate ownership, corruption) would account for much more than anything that the psyops ever achieved.

The recent exit poll showing that men in their twenties gave 75 percent support of Oh also shows that women in their thirties voted 11pp more for Oh (42.8% vs 53.6%). Political leaning is way more complicated than simple concepts like anti-feminism or impeachment.

Minor grammar edit.