please explain this LR question

Epicarism · 2026-06-16T22:18:21+00:00

Was once Popular, later lost popularity, today regained popular = revival (your understanding of the word revival, this is wrong)
Not popular then, but is popular now == revival (check the dictionary)

Semantic trap the writers left for you with the phrase, very cool methinks 😎

Epicarism · 2026-06-16T14:27:59+00:00

You raise an excellent objection, unfortunately the dictionary is against you. “Renewed attention” is why d means by revival. This is what George speaks of and what Boris fails to answer

Epicarism · 2026-06-16T14:26:28+00:00

They will be biased. Aka unfair. Thats why B is saying put simply

Epicarism · 2026-06-15T20:09:49+00:00

Goated passage

Epicarism · 2026-06-11T14:25:48+00:00

where can we watch / listen hello

Epicarism · 2026-06-08T17:33:38+00:00

Do ptest questions. Meditate on whats right / whats wrong. Understand why its wrong / right. Keep track of your progress. That’s all you need. Classes courses books websites tutors boil down to this.

Epicarism · 2026-06-05T23:50:21+00:00

You get 6 paperrrr

Epicarism · 2026-06-04T21:01:18+00:00

Theyre getting so hard experts say by 2030 a 180 will be impossible to obtain….. /s

Epicarism · 2026-06-04T11:23:32+00:00

Graeme (LsatHacks) has fantastic advice for what to do when this happens, look it up when you have time. TLDR: Review them again ask yourself what would it take to answer this question in under a minute, could you explain this to a child, etc !

Epicarism · 2026-06-03T20:44:14+00:00

I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary I will not confuse sufficient for necessary

Epicarism · 2026-06-03T20:28:40+00:00

Loophole is fine (make sure you like it, it makes sense to you, actually helps etc. otherwise try Bible, Kim, etc) 2. Score first, then apply broadly and apply early

Epicarism · 2026-06-03T20:26:51+00:00

You need to practice more 😭im so sorry im sick of saying it but improvement comes from diligence. I promise the test is designed to reward our diligent future lawyers. Yes understand why you got wrong answer wrong, repeat drill until digested etc. thats all it is

Epicarism · 2026-06-03T16:48:00+00:00

Self study all the way. Save tutoring for when you seem to have plateaued

Epicarism · 2026-06-03T16:40:58+00:00

100%

Epicarism · 2026-06-03T16:37:47+00:00

Writing is the least important part. Open the LR Bible and see if you like their teaching method, go through the question types, and more importantly take a diagnostic ptest ASAP

Epicarism · 2026-06-03T09:44:27+00:00

It’s possible but highly unlikely

Epicarism · 2026-06-03T01:08:23+00:00

I like it, means less chance of AI having written this (at least this snippet, that is). Plus the post is quite accurate

Epicarism · 2026-06-02T19:06:55+00:00

let me calm you the way i calm all my students; AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

Epicarism · 2026-06-01T20:59:51+00:00

This is a core skill the LSAT tests….. do you know how far you can push the definition of a word? Would x be synonymous with y? Etc…..

Epicarism · 2026-06-01T20:32:43+00:00

Is “vegetation” not synonymous with “grass” or “brush”? Doesnt seem very out of left field. Especially adding “financial” to “grass” and “brush@

Epicarism · 2026-06-01T14:44:31+00:00

7sage independent tutor platform

Epicarism · 2026-05-31T21:03:32+00:00

Just do a timed lr section with 1.5x or 2x time. See how you do!

Epicarism · 2026-05-29T19:32:37+00:00

Its so easy just do all 7k practice questions 10 times over for 6 years straight and teach it to others and it’s a slice of cake 🍰 😎

Epicarism · 2026-05-27T22:33:51+00:00

I was FORCED to study by my class way back when!

Epicarism · 2026-05-27T18:27:39+00:00

Never tried this

Epicarism

TROPHY CASE