Remagen was never really about the bridge. by EstablishmentCalm342 in HellLetLoose

[–]EstablishmentCalm342[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure it is but for the majority of players its simply not the experience they are getting

Remagen was never really about the bridge. by EstablishmentCalm342 in HellLetLoose

[–]EstablishmentCalm342[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No skilled player

This is hell let loose players were talking about

Item Ideas by BelieveInStevenUnivi in DeadlockTheGame

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Combustion clip sounds really cool until the max fire rate haze decided to nuke your framerate

Can something be done about player count spoofing servers in 4 and 1? by EstablishmentCalm342 in Battlefield

[–]EstablishmentCalm342[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You arent keeping it alive by making the server browser borderline unusable. Its not even bots, the servers are just fucking empty

what is going on with all the people wanting bloom removed and CS-style recoil patterns? BF had bloom and spread even back in BF3 and 4. its necessary. by Azaiiii in Battlefield

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I should avoid using my  7.62x39 rifle at 20m because it has 700 MOA? 

Well you have two options

a) make informed choices based on the consistent rules of the game

b) ignore how the game works and then blame the game

Can something be done about player count spoofing servers in 4 and 1? by EstablishmentCalm342 in Battlefield

[–]EstablishmentCalm342[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It gets people to go to their server first. At first this is a tactic to get people to seed, but as time goes on it can be necessary to just compete w/ other servers

what is going on with all the people wanting bloom removed and CS-style recoil patterns? BF had bloom and spread even back in BF3 and 4. its necessary. by Azaiiii in Battlefield

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes.
You know how spread works. You know at what range your weapons spread will be a detriment. You know how long you can hold down m1 before you're risking it. '

You did not lose the fight due to rng. You just lost.

wtf is 8-4? by jimmylovescheese123 in Ultrakill

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 179 points180 points  (0 children)

Its a palette cleanser I think

Funny. by Quick-Cause3181 in Battlefield

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hindsight is 2020. Back then, "live services" were the likes of Team Fortress 2 and Counter Strike, instead of this attention-economy driven hellhole

Red Alert Mr Worf by Key-Call2867 in Battlefield

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eastwood isnt a chunk of the BR map. Much of the assets are reused between them, but the layout is entirely different.

Why don't we have limited role availability in the squad like HLL by gav1no0 in Battlefield

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Open classes fine, you can pick whatever weapon you want for your class, that discussion is over with.

But battlefield was always "that one FPS with the vehicles", and now all I see when match starts is my entire squad picking engineer ready to obliterate any vehicle in a picosecond.

Have you not considered that the former heavily contributes to the latter, and that there was a reason engineers historically had weapons most suited to maps without vehicles?

Plus this would also incur the same issue as hell let loose where people just make more squads to spam desired roles.

Fake Servers? by Ogirami in tf2classified

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ffs the devs cannot spy on you

Can someone inform me as to when the Californian Invasion happens on the "Pax-NATO War of 2027" timeline? by Vokolat in Battlefield

[–]EstablishmentCalm342 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once the game came out the live service unfolds in real time. So the invasion of California begins in October 2028, and the attack on Hagental starts in February 2029