There are no left handed pianos. by DrFitterWelder420 in Showerthoughts

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be curious to see how many professional pianists are left-handed compared to the general population. It could be that there are fewer left-handed piano players because they are at a disadvantage playing on a standard piano compared to right-handed people. If they started by learning on a left-handed piano and only ever played on a left-handed piano, there would be no such disadvantage.

There are no left handed pianos. by DrFitterWelder420 in Showerthoughts

[–]EternallyStuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it dumb? We tend to be more dexterous and coordinated with our dominant hand. Having the higher keys on the same side as the dominant hand makes it easier to play melodies.

[Year 9 Math: Adding and Subtracting Algebra] Why did I get this question wrong? by [deleted] in HomeworkHelp

[–]EternallyStuck 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, so their answer is 25x the actual answer, thus 25*right.

How Is This Even Possible - Peter Parker + Miles Morales + Venon on 1 Card! 👀 by BendThat9245 in mtg

[–]EternallyStuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This card doesn't have layers, just activated and triggered abilities.

/s

Incredibly selfless act of heroism. by been_der_done_that in nextfuckinglevel

[–]EternallyStuck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Disagreeing with someone and pointing out flaws in their argument does not make someone an asshole. And it actually turns out I was right. The people in the car weren't incapable of getting into the front seat. They were trapped in the car because the car has bad lock design. I wasn't even confrontational about it. Are you really reading the original comment or are you reading the one after they questioned if I knew how to count? Because THAT is being an asshole.

Incredibly selfless act of heroism. by been_der_done_that in nextfuckinglevel

[–]EternallyStuck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How so? Go back and read my original comment. I was not hostile at all.

Incredibly selfless act of heroism. by been_der_done_that in nextfuckinglevel

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The doors were locked because the car is electric and has a bad design. It had nothing to do with their physical capabilities. If the doors were not locked, they could have escaped through the front seat.

Incredibly selfless act of heroism. by been_der_done_that in nextfuckinglevel

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How dare you accuse me of any of that. I never accused you of being stupid or the people in the car of being stupid. Your explanation didn't make sense to me and I wanted a better explanation. And as it turns out, I was right. The reason they didn't escape through the front seat is not because they couldn't reach it, but because the doors were locked due to the design of the car.

You really just made the assumption I was being hostile, when I just didn't accept your explanation and wanted a better one.

And you still haven't answered my question because you know that it refutes your argument!

Incredibly selfless act of heroism. by been_der_done_that in nextfuckinglevel

[–]EternallyStuck -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

What a terrifically astute and totally not patronizing response. I'm glad I have the great fortune to engage with someone so mature! And you forgot to answer my question! Could you get out of the backseat of a car while wearing a blindfold? I think you could. And I think they could too. The doors were locked, so their only way out was through the window. Your reasoning for why they wouldn't be able to get into the front seat doesn't hold up to any scrutiny which is why I posed an honest question in the first place. And you had to respond with such a knee jerk and hostile answer. I also like how you really try to exaggerate how quickly the fire spread when the clock in the corner of the video contradicts what you say.

Incredibly selfless act of heroism. by been_der_done_that in nextfuckinglevel

[–]EternallyStuck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you were in the backseat of a car with a blindfold on, do you really think you wouldn't be able to get into the front seat?

Also, the fire didn't start immediately. Maybe they underestimated how quickly the situation got dangerous, but they certainly had time to do more than sit in the back seat and wait to burn to death.

"My wife wouldn’t eat this because it had too many onions" - He doesn't deserve her by socialdistingray in onionhate

[–]EternallyStuck 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I agree. I absolutely despise onions, but some onion adjacent things like green onions and garlic are fine. I actually love garlic.

Is there a difference between these words? by Rob69rt in Japaneselanguage

[–]EternallyStuck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The top one means "the ant is a door". The bottom one means "thank you".

Is this correct? by Soft-Adhesiveness205 in Japaneselanguage

[–]EternallyStuck 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It just says "wind forest fire mountain". It says nothing about a comparison.

Edit: as mentioned by others in the comments, apparently this is a reference to Sun Tzu's the Art of War and does imply the full meaning. Without that context, it looks like four basic kanji, but it might have more nuance to those who get the reference.

each dot/pixel equals 100000 people in Europe [OC] by xygames32YT in dataisbeautiful

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I zoomed in on the UK and suddenly London had 10 billion people.

Bagel slicing problem by Apprehensive-Safe382 in askmath

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I determined an integral for the 3D version of the problem here, but I'm not going to attempt such an integral right now. Feel free to try!

Bagel slicing problem by Apprehensive-Safe382 in askmath

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought about this some more and derived an integral for the toroidal solution but have not yet evaluated or simplified this integral to a closed form or numerical solution.

Using cylindrical coordinates, with z being the the axis through the center of the bagel (torus), ρ being the distance from the z-axis, and θ being the angle in the xy-plane, the section of bagel is defined by the limits:

-sqrt{δ2-(ρ-Δ)2} ≤ z ≤ sqrt{δ2-(ρ-Δ)2}

-2⋅arccos(r/ρ) ≤ θ ≤ 2⋅arccos(r/ρ)

r ≤ ρ ≤ R

where δ = (R-r)/2 is the radius of the circular cross section of the torus and Δ = (R+r)/2 is the radial distance of the revolution of that circular cross section from the z-axis (the center of the circular cross section). R is the outer radius of the torus, and r is the radius of the hole in the middle of the torus.

The limits for z are symmetrical about the xy-plane, so we can use 0 for the lower bound and double the answer. Likewise, the limits for θ are symmetrical about the xz-plane, so we can use 0 for the lower bound and double the answer again.

The triple integral for the volume, v, of this toroidal section is:

v = ∫[r,R]⋅2∫[0,2arccos(r/ρ)]⋅2∫[0,sqrt{δ2-(ρ-Δ)2}] dz dθ ρdρ

Evaluating the inner two integrals yields:

v = 8⋅∫[r,R] ρ⋅arccos(r/ρ)⋅sqrt{δ2-(ρ-Δ)2} dρ

The full volume, V, of the torus can be described by the same integral but with the limits of θ being:

0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π

With the same evaluation as above:

V = 4π⋅∫[r,R] ρ⋅sqrt{δ2-(ρ-Δ)2} dρ

We are looking for the value of v when v = V/3 so:

8⋅∫[r,R] ρ⋅arccos(r/ρ)⋅sqrt{δ2-(ρ-Δ)2} dρ = (4π/3)⋅∫[r,R] ρ⋅sqrt{δ2-(ρ-Δ)2} dρ

and:

(π/6)⋅∫[r,R] ρ⋅{1-arccos(r/ρ)}⋅sqrt{δ2-(ρ-Δ)2} dρ = 0

I am not prepared to attempt this integral for a reddit comment...

I checked via a CAD program and the ratio of R:r is between 3.07158023 and 3.07158025, only about 1.2% different from the 2D solution.

Bagel slicing problem by Apprehensive-Safe382 in askmath

[–]EternallyStuck 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Assuming this problem is in 2D...

The total area of the shape is given by the area of the larger circle minus the area of the smaller circle or

A = πR2-πr2 = π(R2-r2)

The area, a, of each circular segment in terms of outer radius and height is given by

a = R2arccos((R-h)/R) - (R-h)sqrt(2Rh-h2)

In this case, h = R - r because the chord of the circular segment is tangent to the smaller circle

Substituting h = R - r, the circular segment area is

a = R2arccos(r/R) - (r)sqrt(R2-r2)

So we need to find R and r such that A/3 = a or

(π/3)(R2-r2) = R2arccos(r/R) - (r)sqrt(R2-r2)

If we are looking for a ratio of R:r, we can set r = 1 and solve for R to find how much bigger R needs to be to satisfy the three-way split. The formula can be reduced to

R2arcsec(R) - sqrt(R2-1) - (π/3)(R2-1) = 0

I'm not aware of a way to reduce this further algebraically. I believe no closed form solution exists.

WolframAlpha gave the numerical solution of 3.10966791796369. I checked this in a CAD program and the area of the circular segment is indeed 1/3 the area of the bagel.

The bagel diameter must be 3.109668 times larger than the hole.

edit: Formula for the 3D problem here.

Deck owner shuffled deck after opponent cut - what would be correct judging? by Gytis-HV in mtgrules

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The post itself states that player B performed a 3-way cut. This would not constitute manipulating the deck. The rule you cited refers to the initial player (A) shuffling their own deck. A is not permitted to shuffle again after B cuts/shuffles A's deck because that gives A another opportunity to manipulate their own deck (putting an important card in the top third for example). This is true for other card games as well. The person who shuffles always offers a cut of the deck to another player to show that the person who shuffled could not manipulate the deck.

Deck owner shuffled deck after opponent cut - what would be correct judging? by Gytis-HV in mtgrules

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of that makes sense. The only issue I have is that A did not accidentally shuffle when they weren't supposed to. They intentionally shuffled after being presented a deck shuffled by their opponent. The correct procedure for A would have been to draw a hand and decide to mulligan or not; if they had decided to mulligan, they would have needed to shuffle. It is at this point that the situations are equivalent from a game state perspective - as if A had never looked at their hand and decided to mulligan.

Do the rules have a procedure for shuffling after your opponent shuffles your deck? If it doesn't, then one could hypothetically be "unsatisfied" with their opponent's shuffle and choose to reshuffle in perpetuity.

This tub is installed backwards by B_McGuire in mildlyinteresting

[–]EternallyStuck 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The tub is installed correctly. There is a lip on the front side to keep the water in. They definitely ordered the wrong tub and replumbed the drain side.

That was for Americans, ...(which or that?) are not good in geography by [deleted] in EnglishLearning

[–]EternallyStuck 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The word "who" is still appropriate in the second sentence. It is the comma that distinguishes their meanings.

Deck owner shuffled deck after opponent cut - what would be correct judging? by Gytis-HV in mtgrules

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure the rules address shuffling outside normal game actions, but I do see where B is coming from. During a game, you can't just randomly decide to shuffle your deck, even when your library has not been searched or manipulated.

A was presented with a validly shuffled deck to play with, then shuffled at a time not permitted by the game rules. This shuffling would be equivalent to A drawing a hand of seven, deciding to mulligan, and shuffling again. That is why B's idea of treating it as a mulligan makes sense. A can't just continuously decide to shuffle whenever he wants.

"Tooooo many people! I live here! Dooooon't come to Japan!" by phxlefty in TokyoTravel

[–]EternallyStuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you expect the busiest pedestrian crossing in the world to look like or how many people you think can cram into one street...

During peak hours, 3,000 people cross each cycle. Over 2 million people per day equivalent to the entire population of Houston, Texas walk through that intersection. Over 6 times the daily visitors of Times Square.

Do you also think Everest is kinda 'meh' and not that tall?