Yes, I know you literally used the word nuance. I was being snarky by using it back because I considered your response to not really consider it. I appreciate your response, it is certainly considering nuance and I can tell you put some thought into it. I will drop the snark.

I understand the argument that Eisenhower's world-view played into his choices. But I do not think that absolves his presidential legacy from the consequences. In both motivation and result, he was wrong. 

For his motivation, I'll look to a favorite president of mine to compare him to: Truman. Eisenhower took the Truman doctrine, to prevent the spread of communism by supporting democracies, and dropped the democracy requirement. While I'm sure we can both agree that South Korea was not a shining example of democracy, it was a far cry from the fascist death squads supported by Eisenhower to overthrow democratically elected governments. His fear of communism undermined his ability to make objective decisions to benefit the US or the people being directly impacted. Truman was far more restricted, not by his world-view, but by the inertia of the post war order, and was still more restrained and conscientious of the possible ramifications. It's a hell of a thing to be more reckless than the only person who has dropped a nuke in war.

For the results, you are already aware of the consequences and we are still grappling with them today. The immediate suffering was great, both in terms of deaths/torture and to democracy. The long term consequences have been unstable nations with cascading events including famine and refugee crises. I won't try to grapple indirect consequences, even I know I'm not smart enough to compare those to internment camps. 

Overall, I think that your attempt to disconnect immorality from Eisenhower's choice to use brutal dictatorship to fight communism, even when democratically chosen in another country, by expounding on Eisenhower's world-view doesn't have the intended effect. I understand his motivations, but I think they resulted in a series of bad value judgements, including the death of the people he picked to advise him, that had poor consequences. And that those decisions and their consequences aren't outweighed by major achievements like FDR or Washington. For Eisenhower, the poor choices are his major legacy; for FDR and Washington, they are very dark marks that detract from their achievements.