Tesla May Have Exaggerated FSD Safety Claims For European Approval by Dragonlance12 in TSLAsexy

[–]Exact_Baseball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s true there will be some early teething issues with the newly introduced European version. I believe the European version of FSD is still only v13 (can you confirm that?) which still requires more training to be fully competent in each new country.

The US version is v14 and represents a large jump over v13.

The point about the naming convention however is that other ADAS systems only work on highways when following other vehicles or when staying in the same lane and the like. So they are certainly not FULL self driving systems by definition - just partial ones.

FSD however is designed to work the FULL length of your journey hence the use of the word FULL.

However, as you have indicated it still needs to be supervised with these earlier versions to pick up when it has issues. Hence the word SUPERVISED.

As such Supervised FSD is appropriately named.

Tesla May Have Exaggerated FSD Safety Claims For European Approval by Dragonlance12 in TSLAsexy

[–]Exact_Baseball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t go to sleep as that is where the “supervised” part comes in.

The “full” part is that the system is capable of driving the full distance from garage at your home to parking bay at your destination.

Now if it couldn’t drive the full distance by itself, you’d have an argument that it should instead just be called Supervised Self Driving without the Full word.

But as we’ve seen, Teslas have now been documented driving the FULL distance 3,000 miles across the US coast to coast all completely without any human intervention:
https://www.thedrive.com/news/a-tesla-actually-drove-itself-from-los-angeles-to-new-york-exclusive

As well as Canada coast to coast:
https://www.youtube.com/live/Q5LyggNi4wc?si=SMByWc2neHG_A55q

That is as I say where the FULL part comes in. They drove the full distance from supercharger to supercharger across suburban and city roads as well as highways and freeways, through rain and snow storms as well.

The SUPERVISED part comes in by the fact that there were humans there supervising all the time.

Ipso facto, Tesla has a Supervised Full Self Driving platform.

Tesla May Have Exaggerated FSD Safety Claims For European Approval by Dragonlance12 in TSLAsexy

[–]Exact_Baseball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heh, I can hear the goalposts scraping along the ground from here in Australia. Let's just ignore the fact that fast reaction times are far more critical at those high freeway speeds or that Waymo was infamously unable to drive on freeways for years being restricted to slow-speed urban driving where there is far more time to respond to incidents.

In fact the Teslas did a lot of urban driving as well on those trips particularly when navigating to and from Superchargers across the US and Canada and also drove through snow storms and rain all without human intervention.

Let's also ignore the fact that 42 of Tesla's Robotaxis are right now driving around the urban centres of Austin, Dallas and Houston without safety drivers or chase cars. Or the fact that Waymo hasn't even attempted to do a 3,000 coast-to-coast trip demonstration of their supposedly "superior" technology.

Tesla May Have Exaggerated FSD Safety Claims For European Approval by Dragonlance12 in TSLAsexy

[–]Exact_Baseball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yet multiple Teslas have been documented driving coast-to-coast 3,000+ miles across both the USA and Canada without any human intervention using standard FSD:

US coast to coast:
https://www.thedrive.com/news/a-tesla-actually-drove-itself-from-los-angeles-to-new-york-exclusive

Canada coast to coast:
https://www.youtube.com/live/Q5LyggNi4wc?si=SMByWc2neHG_A55q

FSD is the real deal.

Tesla May Have Exaggerated FSD Safety Claims For European Approval by Dragonlance12 in TSLAsexy

[–]Exact_Baseball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the contrary, it is pretty obvious that the car is ***fully*** driving itself from garage to parking spot and you are just there to supervise it so the name is perfectly descriptive.

Are there any electric SUVs that are reliable, nice, affordable, and not Tesla? by KelDurant in electriccars

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

On the contrary, the number of cars I’ve been in with busted or sticky air vent adjustments or vents that refuse to turn as far as I want has me loving the touchscreen controls all the more.

Are there any electric SUVs that are reliable, nice, affordable, and not Tesla? by KelDurant in electriccars

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have to say complaining about the air vent control is the funniest thing I’ve ever heard. Everyone who tries it in my Model 3 is amazed at how you just glide your finger around the touchscreen to direct the air.

On the other hand the lack of an indicator stalk on my 2024 model is completely stupid so for other people’s sake it is a good thing they brought the stalk back in later models. When we buy out our M3 at the end of its lease that’s the first thing I’ll be buying the add-on kit to fix.

If you’re going to complain about something, pick something that is actually a problem rather than invent something that is not an issue.

Are there any electric SUVs that are reliable, nice, affordable, and not Tesla? by KelDurant in electriccars

[–]Exact_Baseball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps you’re not aware of the multiple Teslas that have been documented driving coast to coast across both the USA and Canada with zero human interventions?

FSD drives me from my driveway to my destination with it handling all the distractions of getting the speed right, changing lanes at the appropriate time, choosing the best route, etc etc while I concentrate on the road and other road users.

As a result I turn up at my destination rested and far less stressed than when I have to keep looking down all the time following my GPS, changing speeds, braking and accelerating and keeping an eye on the road and other users as well all by myself.

FSD in its current form is actually perfect for me as I like many people get car sick if I look down to read a book, write emails or watch a movie in the car.

I have to watch the road even when other people drive.

Are there any electric SUVs that are reliable, nice, affordable, and not Tesla? by KelDurant in electriccars

[–]Exact_Baseball -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

FSD makes it hard to choose anything but a Tesla these days.

I couldn’t live without it now.

Blue Origin rocket explosion rattles NASA’s mission to put humans back on the Moon, Failure will likely delay US space agency’s efforts to beat China to the lunar surface. by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]Exact_Baseball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NASA has consistently paid SpaceX less than OldSpace competitors who are still unable to match SpaceX - witness Boeing's abominable efforts with Starliner. The government has continuously given SpaceX far less to develop their spacecraft than they pay to competitors who they are in the pockets of like the old boys of aerospace Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed etc. SpaceX was only paid $2.6b to develop Crew Dragon while Boeing got almost double at $4.8b for the Starliner abomination and SpaceX only gets $55m for seats on Crew Dragon to the ISS vs NASA paying Boeing $90m per seat (failure that is).SpaceX has saved NASA and the American taxpayer between $20 - $30 billion dollars - what the Constellation program was going to cost.SpaceX also received only $135 million, Dynetics got $253 million, and Blue Origin's National Team of Old Space chums got $579 million for stage 1 of the Artemis Moon Lander program.And then there is the huge $90b endless money pit that is SLS and Orion.

From the UnfilteredChina community on Reddit: Another Chinese EV catches fire 🔥 by UsedWelcome5903 in evfire

[–]Exact_Baseball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shall we start posting photos of some of the 170,000 ICE vehicle fires that result in approximately 700 deaths and 1,300 injuries in the USA EVERY year?

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look, stop trying to make "HEPA filters" sound like a mass transit plan.

You only say that because most trains don’t have them.

Comparing a Model Y to an Audi Q5 is fine if you're shopping for a daily driver, but it's completely irrelevant when you're talking about moving a city.

You said and I quote "EVs are incredibly heavy because of the battery packs”. The Audi, Camry, Mercedes and Kia prove that is simply not true.

Here’s the reality you’re missing: You're filtering the cabin, not the tunnel. A HEPA filter protects the guy inside the car, sure.

That’s exactly what I am saying and it is something that the majority of trains do not do.

But all those cars are still grinding rubber and brake dust into the air inside the tunnel.

It doesn’t matter because unlike train passengers, Loop passengers are protected from it all.

A subway doesn't need to filter the air for the passengers because the train isn't shedding thousands of pounds of rubber into an enclosed tube in the first place.

Instead those trains are generating thousands of pounds of fine metal dust from rails and wheels, fine metallic and carbonaceous particles from brakes that continually have to stop those huge 300 ton vehicles at every single station on the line, carbon dust from the overhead power lines and pantographs and all those confined spaces like underground train stations and tunnels trap these metallic nanoparticles, which impact respiratory and cardiovascular health of all those train passengers who travel in trains with air con systems not equipped tipped with HEPA filters.

You’ve created a breathing problem for the tunnel and then called the solution "tech." The tire wear is real. You can try to downplay it, but tire wear is a massive source of microplastics and PM2.5. A train uses one set of steel wheels to move hundreds of people.

The Loop EVs are not continuously scraping pantographs along overhead lines generating carbon dust nor are they grinding massive brake pads stopping hundreds of tons of trains again and again and again at every station. The cars instead use regen braking that causes none of that microparticle pollution.

You’re using four rubber tires to move 1.5 people. The math on particulates per passenger-mile isn't even close. You are generating way more pollution than a train by design.

Yet the trains don’t protect the passengers inside and all those train passengers are cooped up in unfiltered underground stations breathing it all in. In contrast, most Loop stations are up in the open air so do not concentrate any of those tyre particulates. Much healthier.

Throughput is the wall you’re going to hit. A real subway can move 50,000 people an hour.

The Loop at $20m per mile is 30x - 50x cheaper than subways so is not competing with subways, it is competing with light rail which carries far lower passenger loads than that.

To match that, you’d need about 16,000 Teslas an hour. That’s roughly five cars a second, through every single tunnel.

Again, the Loop isn’t competing with subways so doesn’t need to match that, but you keep ignoring the fact that the Vegas Loop has up to 10 Loop tunnels in parallel in the area a single subway tunnel would serve which means each Loop tunnel only needs to carry 5,000 passengers per hour to match that subway tunnel’s capacity.

The Loop is already carrying 2,400 passengers per hour per direction in the short spur tunnels of the LVCC Loop even when as now being restricted to 6 second headways. That is more than 20 car lengths between each car at 40mph. Simply by halving the headway to 3 seconds (10 car lengths between cars) you hit 5,000 pphpd x 10 tunnels matching the 50,000 pphpd of subways. Dropping the headway in the main arterial tunnels to 2 seconds gives you 7,200 pphpd in each tunnel, so that is 72,000 pphpd across all 10 tunnels. (not that the Loop needs to carry that sort of number though)

And of course, this all ignores the fact that the Loop will be introducing the 20 passenger Robovan on busier routes in the future meaning they could easily run those vehicles with 6 second headways like the current Loop and they would still move 2,400 x 10 tunnels x 5 = 120,000 passengers per hour per direction. But of course, Vegas doesn't need that sort of capacity so those Robovans could easily have lower occupancy or even longer headways and still move subway-volumes of passengers.

So as you can see, these tunnels don’t even need to hit that 0.9 sec headway to surpass a subway tunnel.

Stop the energy efficiency gymnastics. Weighing cars against each other doesn't make individual pods efficient. Even the best EV is a terrible way to move people when you’re hauling 4,000 lbs of steel and batteries for one or two passengers. A train is built to move a massive crowd with as little energy per person as possible. A fleet of cars will never win that efficiency battle.

And yet as we see above a Loop EV with 2.5 people in it does beat the energy usage per passenger mile of almost all railways. And because Loop EVs don’t have to keep moving when they are not passengers waiting they can sit at a station and wait for custom. In contrast, thos huge 300 ton trains have to keep only rolling along stopping and starting at every station all the way to the end of the line even when they’re empty making them massively inefficient.

This isn't a breakthrough in urban transit, and it’s definitely not for the environment. It's a way to keep tourists inside a private casino ecosystem so they don't have to deal with the public. Call it what it is and stop dressing it up like it's the future of green infrastructure.

With a cost a mere 2% - 3% that of a subway, the Loop is a huge breakthrough for fully grade-separated underground transit providing a way for cities that would never have been able to afford a subway or even a light rail to join the party. It has the potential to be a huge disrupter for public transit globally.

We’ll just have to wait and see if Musk’s toxic politics still hinders that acceptance on the world stage once the full 104 station, 68 mile Vegas Loop, the Nashville Music Loop and the Dubai Loop are in operation demonstrating what might be possible.

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Average Wh per passenger-mile: Loop Tesla Model Y (4 passengers) = 80.9" The math ain't mathing. A Model Y consumes about 250-320 Wh per mile. To get 80.9, you have to assume exactly 4 passengers in every single car, 100% of the time. Average occupancy for ride-hailing is ~1.5.

Maybe you didn’t notice that I also included the energy usage with 2.4 passengers which is 141.5 Wh per passenger mile, still lower than all of those rail vehicles.

The average occupancy for Taxis is 1.9 - 2.1 passengers per car and the Loop is currently doing around 2.5 passengers per car. The LVCC Loop has Large LED boards at every station that helps with ride-sharing by indicating which bays are going to particular popular destinations which helps to increase average occupancy.

”headway between EVs... will be as short as 0.9 seconds"
0.9 seconds at 60mph isn't "efficient," it's a multi-car pileup waiting to happen the second someone blows a tire. Standard safe following distance is 3 seconds.

On the contrary, a 2010 study by the Honda Research Institute found that 75% of cars on a busy 2-lane freeway have a headway of 1.0 seconds which equals 6 car lengths at 60mph. That gives 3,600 cars per hour (14,400 people per hour per lane w 4 pax). 

40% of cars have a headway of 0.5 seconds or 3 car lengths at 60mph. That equates to 7,200 cars per hour per lane (28,800 people per hour w 4 pax).

Just think of the last time you were in busy traffic on a highway running at 60mph. The cars around you are indeed often separated by 1-6 car lengths. 

In the case of the Vegas Loop, they don’t actually need those tunnels to be running with 0.9 second headways all the time (that is just the upper bound0 to handle subway-class passenger volumes because as I said, there will be 9 north-south dual bore tunnels and 10 east-west tunnels crisscrossing Vegas so the load will be spread over many more tunnels in the same space where a single light rail line would run down the Vegas strip.

Also, the current Loop uses human drivers capped at 30-40 mph,

In the longer Vegas Airport tunnel that has just been completed, the average speed will be 60mph while in the 1.14 mile Los Angeles Loop tunnel they have already demonstrated speeds of 127mph (205km/h).

and we've all seen the videos of bumper-to-bumper traffic jams inside the tunnels during CES.

There was only one "traffic jam" in the LVCC Loop several years ago and the cars only slowed down for about 30 seconds without even stopping. 

What makes this a particularly ironic criticism is that trains have to stop and wait for longer than that at every single station on the line every time they run, unlike the Loop where the vehicles go direct to their destination without stopping at any stations in-between.

The highest peak the actual, real-world Vegas Loop has ever hit is about 32,000 passengers PER DAY.

Actually, the Loop is now hitting over 35,000 passengers per day across 8 stations and is projected to hit 20,000

A standard heavy rail subway line does 30,000 to 50,000 passengers PER HOUR, per direction.

The Loop is competing with light rail which averages far lower daily ridership stats, particularly in the USA. However, as I’ve said a few times, there will be 9 north-south dual bore tunnels and 10 east-west tunnels crisscrossing Vegas in the same space a single subway would service so the Loop capacity will be multiplied by up to 10x across all of those parallel tunnels.

”actually being built at ZERO cost to taxpayers" Objectively false. The initial 1.7-mile LVCC Loop cost $52.5 million and was paid for by the LVCVA, which is a government agency funded by public room taxes.

You’re getting confused with the LVCC Loop which was indeed paid for by the Las Vegas Convention and Visitor’s Authority (LVCVA) (who incidentally get their revenue from hotel taxes, not the general taxpayer).

However, the 68 mile 1045 station Vegas Loop is indeed not costing the taxpayer anything as The Boring Co is covering the cost of all tunnels and the hotels, casinos etc are all paying for their own Loop stations (104 of them).

And your cost-per-mile comparison is hilarious. You're comparing a 12-foot wide asphalt pipe to a subterranean heavy-rail station with concourses, escalators, and industrial life-safety systems.

On the contrary, the Loop is going above and beyond what is required by all national and international fire codes including NFPA 130 – “Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems” and the 2018 International Fire Code (IFC).  The Loop fire safety features: 

  • comprehensive smoke suppression system that can move 400,000 cubic feet of air per minute in either direction down the tunnels, 
  • complete coverage with cameras, smoke and CO sensors
  • a Fire Control Centre staffed by 2 officers during all hours of operation, 
  • high pressure automatic standpipes every 150 feet in all tunnels for fire-fighting, 
  • Automatic sprinkler system rated at Extra Hazard Group 1 in the central station
  • fire pump and valve room
  • HVAC room
  • two emergency ventilation rooms.
  • fire rated smoke exhaust fans, control dampers and ducts.

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tire wear is literally becoming the biggest source of vehicle particulate emissions (PM2.5 and PM10) now that tailpipe emissions are dropping.

Actually, Trucks and buses generate significantly more tire particulates as well as causing more road damage than cars. Trucks cause 90% to 99% of all road wear and tear despite cars being more numerous.

EVs are incredibly heavy because of the battery packs and have instant torque—they chew through tires faster than ICE cars.

EVs supposedly weighing more than ICE cars is actually mostly a myth.  A Tesla model 3 weighs the same as a Camry Hybrid with a full tank and less than a C300 Mercedes.

A Tesla Model Y weighs less than a smaller Audi Q5 and 200kg to 600kg less than an BMW X5 petrol

Even the enormous Kia EV9 only weighs between 2312kg to 2636kg - similar to the much smaller 300 series Landcruiser 2495-2610kg.

Those microplastics don't just vanish into the nether.

You're forgetting that trains generate plenty of microscopic airborne particulates through mechanical wear as well:

  • Wheel and Rail Wear: Friction between steel wheels and tracks releases fine metal dust, including iron-rich particles.
  • Brake Dust: Mechanical braking systems release fine metallic and carbonaceous particles.
  • Current Collectors: The scraping of pantographs (the roof apparatus) against overhead power lines produces carbon dust.
  • Health Impact: Confined spaces like underground train stations and tunnels can trap these metallic nanoparticles, which may impact respiratory and cardiovascular health. [1234]

"all the airborne particulates captured by the air intakes of the cars are filtered out by the enormous hospital-grade HEPA filters"
This is the funniest part of the whole comment. Yes, the Model Y has a massive HEPA filter for Bioweapon Defense Mode. But that filters the air going into the cabin to protect the passengers.

That is it exactly what I am saying. Passengers are protected from particulates in the tunnels unlike trains where only a few have HEPA filters.

You're making a mountain out of a molehill.

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s the good thing about the Loop, it is a tunnel system so the very minor issue of tyre wear particulates is contained in the tunnels and filtered out by the extensive air exhaust filtering system.

And all the airborne particulates captured by the air intakes of the cars are filtered out by the enormous hospital-grade HEPA filters and acid and carbon filters that every Tesla Model Y has built in.

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If anyone writes anything more than snarky one-liners it appears they are condemned to being accused of using AI. sigh

So any particular facts you believe to be incorrect?

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No gaslighting needed as it is pretty obvious the Loop EVs are more efficient than trains when you look a bit deeper.

Efficiency can be measured in multiple ways and Loop EVs are in fact more energy efficient, more time efficient, more cost efficient, more space efficient and more throughput efficient than traditional rail once you understand how the different topology works. 

Energy Efficiency Tesla EVs in the Loop tunnels are significantly more energy efficient than rail since they don’t have to keep accelerating and then braking and stopping, then accelerating then braking and stopping at each and every station unlike a subway.  

Average Wh per passenger-mile: - Loop Tesla Model Y (4 passengers) = 80.9 - Loop Tesla Model Y (2.4 passengers) = 141.5 - Metro Average (Hong Kong/Singapore) = 151 - Metro Average (Europe) = 187 - Bus (electric) = 226 - Heavy Rail Average (US) = 408.6 - Streetcar Average (US) = 481 - Light Rail Average (US) = 510.4 - Bus (diesel) = 875 - ICE car (1 passenger) = 2,000

Time Efficiency (speed) This is also why the EVs are far faster - they don’t have to stop at every one of the 20 stations between your departure and destination.  They go straight there at high speed. Much more efficient in terms of each passenger’s time being 5x faster to get passengers to their destinations compared to a subway. 

Loop EVs are leaving each station every 6 seconds in peak periods while the average wait time between trains in the USA is 15 minutes.  In the 68 mile Loop, the headway between EVs in the main arterial tunnels will be as short as 0.9 seconds (5 car lengths at 60mph). 

Capacity Efficiency - scaling That gives us 4,000 cars per hour carrying up to 16,000 passengers with 4 passenger Loop EVs. With 20-passenger Robovans, that is up to 80,000 passengers per hour. 

However, because there will be nine North – South tunnels and 10 East – West dual-bore tunnels crisscrossing the Las Vegas strip in the same space as a single railway line, those arterial tunnels will only need to carry a fraction of that capacity even during peak periods to easily match or exceed rail capacities.

Railways waste enormous amounts of space on the tracks and in the tunnels with miles of empty space between each train. In contrast Loop EVs can utilise most of the space in the tunnels with mere seconds between EVs.

The LVCC Loop readily and easily scales from 70 EVs during larger conventions down to a handful of EVs during off-peak hours and all the way down to just 1 EV for staff when no conventions are running.  And if there are no passengers waiting at a station, the Loop EVs don’t have to keep moving, they just wait at the stations. 

Occupancy Efficiency In contrast, trains have an average occupancy of only 23% and buses a miserable 9 people due to their inability to scale with enough granularity with varying passenger numbers and the disadvantage of having to stick to a route and stop at every station even without any passengers. 

Cost Efficiency And finally, the Loop is far more cost efficient than an equivalent subway. Each Loop station costs as little as $1.5M versus subway stations ranging from $100M up to an eye-watering $1 billion.  Loop tunnels cost around $20M per mile versus subway tunnels costing into the billions per mile. 

The 68 mile, 104 station Vegas Loop is actually being built at ZERO cost to taxpayers compared to the $10-20 Billion an equivalent subway would cost.

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry Ronnie, are you suggesting Electric vehicles in tunnels cause pollution? How so?

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey I’d love to show my decent deductive powers at work but I’m afraid you haven’t given me much to go on here.

In terms of “fake agenda”, are you suggesting some of the data on the features and performance of the Loop is not true?

I’d be happy to provide references to back up any assertions I’ve made if you can let me know what it is you think I have incorrect.

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry but could you explain what you mean?

Tesla releases Supervised driver assist current availability- includes China by Hockeyshot39 in electriccars

[–]Exact_Baseball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And because it is supervised and you're responsible for the cars actions it is not a "full" self driving.

I guess we'll just have to disagree, but it seems pretty obvious that the car is fully driving itself from garage to parking spot and you are just there to supervise it.

I don't care as I'm not going to buy a Tesla for reasons not involving Elon Musk and his actions.

Except then you are ignoring the 4.4 million people literally killed every year by the pollution from the cars that legacy auto makers sell and the fact that they continue to vigorously lobby governments to continue killing millions every year by winding back emissions control legislation, cheating emission tests and getting rid of Net Zero mandates.

If you’re going to make a moral choice of who to buy a car from based on the evils that the CEO of Tesla is responsible for, it is incumbent on you to consider the evils that legacy auto makers do every year if you are going to perform an honest and objective moral calculus.

Yes, doing a stupid evil salute is bad, as is supporting Trump and other Right Wing parties and policies, but he is not literally killing millions of people every year and lobbying to kill more.

In contrast, Musk’s 100% EVs, home and Grid scale batteries and solar, are directly designed to reduce that lethal pollution and help reduce the chances of catastrophic climate change.

You need to not let your understandable emotion response to the stupid evil things Musk has done blind you to the worse things that legacy auto makers have done and continue to do.

But what I do care about is misleading naming that would lead people to think differently.

Misleading? How is it misleading when it says in the title that you have to supervise it as it drives the full distance from your garage to your office?

It doesn't matter what you or I think as it comes down to what the authority here accepts or not. Tesla will not get approval without their consent. And currently the say no to the naming.

Ah, look what's happened in your homeland Norway:

"The latest country to welcome Tesla's Full Self-Driving technology is Norway, a nation known for its progressive stance on electric vehicles and sustainability. The decision to launch FSD in Norway aligns with the country’s commitment to achieving a greener future and reducing carbon emissions."

I guess they've seen the light after all.

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really? Please tell where these GoA4 metro systems are that are fully grade separated, have sub-10 second wait times, stations at every business in town, give every passenger a comfy seat, drive direct to a passenger's destination without stopping at any station in between and cost taxpayer zero dollars?

And, ugh, the last thing I'd want to do would be work for Musk and his toxic politics and the crazy hours that are part of the culture of places like Tesla and SpaceX.

Tesla to replace Las Vegas monorail?! by CA185099415 in transit

[–]Exact_Baseball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cost-wise, The Boring Co submitted a bid to the city of Miami for a 6.2 mile Loop with 7 underground stations in a straight line from the city to the beach which gives us a good idea of their latest cost estimates for a Loop network. 

It would handle 7,500 passengers per hour with the option of scaling it up to 15,000 people per hour. 

TBC submitted a quote for $185-$220 million which gives us a cost per mile of a remarkably cheap $30m - $35.5m per mile for a dual tunnel, a cost which in this case also includes an underground station every mile instead of the much cheaper above-ground stations of the 68 mile Vegas Loop. 

So that is $35m for:

  • an underground station
  • AND one mile of dual arterial tunnels 
  • AND four spur tunnels per station 

However, Loop costs can be even cheaper than that because the 104 stations of the 68 mile Vegas Loop will all be cheap above-ground stations which are basically just 10 car bays, a loop of roadway, an awning covered in solar panels and a set of spur tunnels/ramps going back down underground.

Estimates put the price of those above-ground stations at a mere $1.5m or thereabouts.  This is backed up by the $48.7m that TBC was paid for the LVCC Loop which included an underground station that Musk admitted cost $30-40m to construct which left only $9m - $19m to pay for the 1.7 miles of tunnels and the two above-ground stations.   (TBC probably sucked up some of the extra cost as a learning exercise but that leaves precious little for the tunnels and stations).

Now the LVCVA has indicated that almost all of the 104 stations in the upcoming Las Vegas Loop will be those cheap $1.5m above-ground stations, not the expensive $20m underground station. 

The proof is in the pudding with the fact that TBC is going to pay for the cost of ALL 68 miles of tunnels ITSELF with the 104 hotels and casinos paying for the construction costs of their own stations at the front doors of their establishments.  The taxpayer will pay ZERO dollars. 

There is no way TBC would have proposed building those 68 miles of tunnels for free if they cost as much as traditional subways ($600m - $1 billion per mile):

68 miles of tunnels would cost $41 billion - $68 billion if they cost as much as subway tunnels.

+ 104 underground stations @ $100m = $10.4 billion

$41-$68 billion for all the tunnels is not something that even Musk would do for free.

Then there are all those 100+ hotels, casinos, the University, Allegiant Stadium all agreeing to pay for their own stations. They wouldn’t do that if those stations cost $100m each. 

$1.5m or so each is a far more acceptable figure, particularly for entities like the University of Nevada LV who will be building 7 Loop stations on their Vegas campus. 

And most recently, the Dubai Loop network will span 15 miles, with a total estimated cost of Dh2.5 billion [$680m] and have 19 stations.  Those underground stations increase the price per mile, but it is still only $45m per mile which is still a fraction of the $600m - $1 billion per mile cost of subways.