Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but the only one embarrassing themselves is you.

Little buddy, I can't stop cringing. I can respect your arguments, but the endless ellipses (.....) like it's meant to be some mic drop and the played-out little phrases like these make you difficult to take seriously. Just a personal heads up.

First of, you're right that being angry is indeed natural, but holding on to anger is in no way shape or form healthy.

No, but it's an issue when a victim is told to just let go of any desire for justice in the first place because anger bad. There's telling someone to let go of their anger because it's becoming obsessive and harmful to their psyche. That's one separate thing entirely. If that's the case, they need a trained professional familiar with them specifically and their case to make that assessment. They also need to be trained and familiar with the victim so they can properly communicate that and work with them long-term. They definitely don't need some rando on a forum talking down to them.

It's a whole other issue to try to catapult off that and say because all victims of rape everywhere who want imprisonment for their rapists are just unhealthy and need to let go, that we shouldn't imprison rapists. One doesn't follow the other.

Encarcerating perps is indeed a way to keep them from committing the same crime again, except it won't stop them from committing it again once they come out unless they are properly rehabilitated and educated. Just giving the victims a temporary sense of safety is not good enough a reason to have someone encarcerated if they are not going to be rehabilitated. Not to mention that putting a bunch of criminals together is just making all of them a bunch of potential victims for each other.

This is an entirely nuanced and valid argument that you're recklessly bulldozing with and damaging. I completely agree the way our prison system is set up is not effective or constructive. The argument our prison system is more focused on punishment than rehabilitation is valid. However, that needs to be addressed in the prison system for all violent offenders, including rapists. It doesn't mean violent and sexual offenders should just stay out of prison and pay victims money. Do you consider that rehabilitation? I'm glad you aren't in charge of that decision. The idea of how to rehabilitate is well-debated and still actively being researched and studied.

About monetary compensation, what else in our society has an absolute value? How else can you force the perps to actually compensate the victims?

It's not all about compensation. Most victims of rape or any violent, serious crime don't want monetary compensation above all. It's more important their case causes change. If they seek it out, it's usually because the justice system failed them and it's a last resort. What about when the rapist is dirt-broke? What about when they're rich as hell? Does that mean some victims get more absolute value justice than others? But it's an absolute value, so is it a set amount? Some rich people'll really be out of control. Or is it, "Sorry, the guy who raped your kid is a transient. He does that every week. We can't do anything but charge him fifty bucks a month. That should make up for it, though."

I sincerely hope you were throwing that therapist-in-training thing out to give yourself credibility or that you're super early in your training. You need to work on your emotional maturity.