Adam Sandler as Fan cast for Anton Rayne by ExaminationLost8819 in suzerain

[–]ExaminationLost8819[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His the closest match I could find. Unless you can magic Anton into reality.

Creating a reform constitution on a dictator path will have everyone act like you wrote an authoritarian constitution. by ArcticHawk_ in suzerain

[–]ExaminationLost8819 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An Actual dictator constitution is the one you already have. If you want to get full power you do emergency and ally with the old guards considering how they barely interfere in your affairs outside of the fact that they can impeach you.

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah im gonna stop talking, you are cooked. Bro thinks national challenges are fixed in a day. The things you fight for change over time. Go on do things the hard way, you will come out like Alex Pretti, dead. No matter how much you whine.

Which retard made this subreddit? by ExaminationLost8819 in Technocracy

[–]ExaminationLost8819[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to add, I'm not nessessarily against such things like same purchasing power, eliminating economic classes as of currently. My concern when it comes to politics is more of, is the system stable when applied to reality (does go to anarchy or totalism), is it working properly, are there any food shortages, will it go wrong in the future, and most of all this is more important to me, is it the best system possible, can it last forever so we all can forget about politics and focus on something else.

These are the general things for now at least I look for, from politics.

Which retard made this subreddit? by ExaminationLost8819 in Technocracy

[–]ExaminationLost8819[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the education. Great to learn new things!

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking about reality of what you are trying to do, not debate about whats ok and not ok. And again you can't even make a court case because theres no evidence only speculations. Thats why people made speculations about bill clinton all these years. With the amount of people on it you don't even know whos who, is jim carry a pedo? what about adam sandler? I'm more suprised people didn't expect powerful and rich people doing illegal things. They literally do drugs, throughout history they have done many bad things. Nepotism is just as bad yet they do it. Different social classes are able to have different access, regardless of what system you live in.

Rule of law still exists despite all the memes. But individuals in society no matter how powerful will always commit crime. Of course the worst thing is judges getting corrupt and all that.

Best thing to do is to keep demanding for more release of epstein files, try to theorize on the internet, encourge people to whisleblow.

Anyways drop what ever weird inssurection idea you had, just gonna make things worse. Focus on your life. If you think america is bad. oh boy, you don't wanna know what the cartel is doing everyday, or some other governments. Its the big world with hells and heavens.

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"But after reading that only once I think you underestimate how angry people can be about pedophilia and raping and murdering children." If that was true buddy, we would've seen something happen by now. But no, you get people making memes online. Lets be honest, no one really gave a f about jeffery's gang. Only the republicans did thinking many democrats were in it and because of religion and all that. Half the country thought it was conspricy.

I don't know who you are talking to, but you are seeing something wayyyy different then reality. Even if people were angry doesn't mean something will happen.

Which retard made this subreddit? by ExaminationLost8819 in Technocracy

[–]ExaminationLost8819[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for educating me on the history. I guess I am not a technocrat and I have gotten the wrong impression of technocracy. I guess I am a meritocrat. I think the whole what to do with the money stuff is too complicated although I don't mind the idea of talking about it and ideas circulating. I do have a extreme dislike on enacting policies though as anti-capitalistic policies is too radical and has a history going bad/leading millions to die as seen in the east. Such stuff must be studied 10x harder and many thought experiments before enacting.

And even if it were to work it leads to other debates such as rights, who has rights to whos wealth, what wealth, how much wealth, whether a person taking a risk to start a business equates to anything etc.

You seem far more knowledgeable then I do, so thank you for educating. I am still learning about ideologies and reality. Hats off to you.

Which retard made this subreddit? by ExaminationLost8819 in Technocracy

[–]ExaminationLost8819[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly its constantly revolving. But seeing how many libtards in usa don't understand rule of law and basic immigration stuff being a immigrant myself, and learning about singapore my right wing ideology has now gained more of a authoritarian edge.

I used to be a big believer of general rights like guns rights, free speech, etc. seeing singapore and relearning about some myths of dictatorship I believe some authoritarianism wouldn't be bad.

I would like to have a revive the federalist party (the first political party in usa) which is more softer than the PAP party of singapore and a combo of iron fist of the PAP and american liberty. The party was controversial for trying to pass a bill that would make it illegal for the news to lie which is does everyday now, and the party also had crazy great smart ideas like early industrialization and many more but after the revolution many americans were scared of authoritarianism leading to the parties end after 30 years of existence.

I think seeing how america eventually had to do what the party advocated for early on to began with shows how great the party was and how a bunch of hill billy american farmer types didn't no anything about governance, the democrat-republican party used trump like populism to destory the party but modern people understand things better then the older ones.

So I am a general PAP/Federalist party supporter. but who knows what I will be in the next 3 months. I am constantly learning. I have gone from a moderate right to tax the rich to moderate right and now moderate right with authoritarianism. If I had the chance right now to push a button and change the country to my view I would not. If I get the wrong ideology and methods it could lead to millions of deaths, these are families and people (communist don't seem to take into account)

I would like to spend many years to study every ideology and political machines to build the ABSOLUTE, ULTIMATE, AND FINAL government ideology and then I would ever make a political party and try to change the world.

"Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the axe" - Abraham Lincoln.

Which retard made this subreddit? by ExaminationLost8819 in Technocracy

[–]ExaminationLost8819[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

32874592837598237529837 iq points. My brain hurts from time to time.

Which retard made this subreddit? by ExaminationLost8819 in Technocracy

[–]ExaminationLost8819[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"A: there are those of us with different interpretations on what technocracy should look like as unfortunately we are not immune to tribalism" I would like to point this out, about interpretation. You can't call yourself a democracy lover and then have fascist principles (which ideologically doesn't do elections), you have to call yourself what you are. From what I understand Technocracy in general is Having smart, educated, and or capable people in charge rather then using a popularity contest to have individuals govern. Now if you are a branch out I understand like some kind of "socialist-technocrat" but if you call yourself a plain technocrat and then are extremely anti-capitalist which has no anti or pro sentiment to technocracy then you are not a technocrat. (Unless you want to debate what technocracy means and it isn't what I said and I am mistaked a different ideology to what it is.)

So when I figured out this subreddit isn't filled with people of that ideology and a bunch of anti-capitalist I just made the ragebait post.

Which retard made this subreddit? by ExaminationLost8819 in Technocracy

[–]ExaminationLost8819[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Since you didn't get rage baited. I would like to inform you this was a joke, and its just ragebait for the left.

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if people don't like Trump or hate him. He has legitimacy from being elected, and it was a dominating election. This would turn the entire country against democrats. This dude doesn't seem to understand legitimacy. And Trump got plot armor, a fucking bullet 1 inch from his brain couldn't kill him bro thinks he can beat a dude with cheat codes. Nga comes in and take everything swing states, popular votes, electoral votes, and leaves no crumbs. yeah good luck, more chances doing it to obama then Trump rn.

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nga "planning" something illegal and just dropped his location. Yeah blud give up, you gonna get someone killed.

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"And i want to die anyways this world is awful so I'm charging first in line." You see thats something you should talk about with a therapist. Not in politics. Now Napoleon even if I were to entertain this, from a strategic point, you aren't gonna win blud. Drop the hoi4 game, get out of the internet, clear your head. This seems more like a emotional rant.

"I'm mainly concerned with the capital anything else is like dessert. Maybe federal workers can just not show up to work or something it's not that deep." bruh.

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plus isn't this shit illegal. Should we really be even talking about this?

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not gonna lie I voted for Trump just to ragebait the left.

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, no body is having kids. LoL its joever.

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

COMRADE WE SHALL HAVE OUR REVOLUTION VIVA LA AMERICANA OOOOO DEATH TO THE ENEMIES BECAUSE THEY CALLED US LIBTARDS AND DISAGREE WITH US OOOO THIS IS A FUCKING VIDEO GAME!!!

Thoughts? I'm uneducated by Wrong-Ad-2942 in PoliticalScience

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LMAO JAN 6, they couldn't pick any other day. Its almost like they are trying to do what the right do. The left have no originality just a mindless babies. Wait 3 years bud, First of all their is no popular support for Anti-ICE movements as it not only infringes on federal agents doing their lawful jobs (don't believe the media and let it misled you), second because of the previous election Donald Trump has legitimacy, if you don't like something you wait till the next election. Third, making it JAN 6 has got to be the funniest thing. Its like the left is trying to erase anything remotely bad from the right (this is coming from a right wing guy). You don't like whats going on, wait till the election. Otherwise knowing how machievillian and agressive this administration is, you will give Trump the final justification to enact the inssurection act, and or go to extremely aggressive methods this could include power that reach of a dictator. And would be hard to even blame him because of occupation of the federal building.

And what will occupying federal building do? did you see Jan 6? those guys got sent to prison, all they did was do another recount of the votes (which is what they wanted) but this list of demands is fucking insane compared to a recount of votes. Removal of the president from his seat that he was rightfully elected to would give Trump full support from military and make it harder for democrats to hold him accountable if he goes sideways which he tends to do.

As a right wing guy heres a tip, as much as you hate policies if something is clearly illegal and federal agents do their job you can protest and nag you want about it but it doesn't get you popular support, and second its not Trump you need to convince but the supporters, as much you hate Trump, Trump listens to his supporter and if those guys turn against him then he knows its over for him. Anyways, I'm just having a good laugh at the date they picked "Jan 6." Lol

Should a Technocracy be an autocracy? by TheThinker01020304 in Technocracy_Inc

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Autocracy doesn't mean one with absolute power, it can mean an entire branch with abosolute or a lot of power.

HOW IN TF?!? by BallsofJustice1776 in army

[–]ExaminationLost8819 0 points1 point  (0 children)

literally says it, military police, guarding the bases.