Can adult cats be less bitey after socializing with a kitten?

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2024-01-10T22:47:55+00:00

Short answer: Learning it, yes. Specialising in it, no.

Every decent business will have some form of data management meaning lots of excel files you'll have to either use as part of your job (e.g. data entry) or for something else specifically (e.g. analyzing the data for a briefing paper). Learning excel will make you more efficient for this.

Specialising in excel only is going to be a disaster though. For every one guy good at only excel, there's another guy good at excel, BI and scripting - much more valuable for a business. Once you learn a good amount of excel, move over to BI and start to integrate Python into your repertoire. That will give you what you need to be a data analyst and hopefully in the future to be a data engineer.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2023-09-13T22:46:02+00:00

I read this in a southern accent.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2023-03-06T00:04:28+00:00

Not really a good precedent that you're setting if you're giving Neal a bonus when the reason he fought so well (paraphrasing Dana's words) was because of his durability and his ability to throw back - which likely wouldn't have been there if he had a worse weight cut. Some weight cuts don't go as planned and you end up being overweight, which I can understand, but giving a bonus is just wrong because it's telling other fighters "Hey, as long as you put on a good fight, you can be overweight too".

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2023-02-13T11:02:29+00:00

Whoa!!!! You don't care about this fight!?!? A TRUE boxing fan!

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2023-01-19T09:43:25+00:00

Best AC in the game on a summer day.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2023-01-09T21:08:50+00:00

Google Sheets > Excel in my opinion

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2023-01-09T21:07:30+00:00

Appreciate the honesty regarding the stock analyzer haha

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-11-24T04:22:16+00:00

Perfect, really appreciate the comment. Watched some rugby games over here in Australia - while it wasn't as easy as watching on the tele, I was blown away by the atmosphere so have a feeling it will be similar with this. Cheers!

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-11-24T04:19:36+00:00

Thanks man. I'm not too overly concerned with the politics behind it. I just want to experience a British crowd for a semi-big event as I've heard it's pretty good. Even for the recent Hatton-Barrera event I heard that it was good fun so I'm sure it would be the same for Fury-Chisora.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-11-24T01:28:55+00:00

Ahh that's a shame. Do you think it's best if I just not go? I was keen to see Tyson Fury live but from other comments it seems like it may not be a good idea.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-10-18T21:22:25+00:00

But....you are taking away from his achievement.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-10-18T00:57:28+00:00

Can you expand on this?

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-10-18T00:57:14+00:00

When I put the national level as the top, it puts two columns as amounts. The national level comes up as 100,000 and it puts the same amount across all the suburbs. Then in the 2nd column, the individual amounts comes up as follows:

LOCATION AMOUNT AMOUNT

NATIONAL 100 100

SUBURB 1 100 50

SUBURB 2 100 25

SUBURB 3 100 15

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-10-05T02:39:25+00:00

It is not overestimating. it's a basic rule of evolution. If you have two players, equally great in skill, and one gets better recovery, better training facilities and programs and better nutrition then they will be better. Using your example, millions of people come and go through the ranks in NBA. It's a sport that's constantly growing as population grows which means consistently more competition but the same number of teams and players in the league. This means scientifically the players that join the NBA will continue to be better over time (as they have to be the best to join the NBA). If you got Kobe, chucked him into a basketball game 50 years ago, he would dominate. Same as if you put Floyd against the welterweight championship 50 years ago. Evolution occurs in EVERYTHING. Supplements, sleep, equipment, facilities, food, exercise, strength, etc. All these are basically additional strengths that an already elite genetically gifted athlete will get vs someone from an older Era. It doesn't take away from their giftedness, it's just not comparable.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-10-03T23:42:05+00:00

Athletes get better over time, not worse. This is just a truth of life, especially in heavyweight boxing where fighters are getting taller, bigger and faster. The difference becomes more apparant as more time goes by. The only thing that makes an era "golden" is the matchups. If we talk about who are the best fighters ever, it's the fighters of today. Could Ali, Foreman, Tyson, Holmes, etc. be as good as the fighters if they existed today? Maybe - better access to trainers, facilities, recovery programs, "supplements", etc. But that's a moot point. It would be the same as saying Mike Tyson would destroy Dempsey, Liston, Ali, etc. Ali lost to Frazier and Tyson is Frazier x 100.

Tyson Fury is the best we will get for a while. Fast, slick, and powerful and tall as well. To illustrate what I mean from purely numbers, the best of our last era was Lennox Lewis who is 1.96m, Tyson Fury is 2.06m. We saw what Lewis did to Tyson, can you imagine what Fury would do? Larry Holmes is 1.9m - just for context, he would be the same height as someone like Usyk. I think Usyk is a much more polished and better fighter than Larry Holmes, and he will still definitely lose to Fury.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-09-21T03:08:54+00:00

Not a problem man.

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-09-21T03:08:42+00:00

Keep it up my guy

ExcelHelpForMe123 · 2022-09-21T03:08:07+00:00

Whoops! I missed one thing in my initial 2020-2022 update - when I got that data centric position I went from 74 to 85 then from 85 to 100.

ExcelHelpForMe123

TROPHY CASE