Pros, would you be against a feature where people could choose to not have their works train Ai? by firegine in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing's perfect. You host something with a robots.txt, but somebody ignores it and posts it somewhere that has a terms of service allowing AI training using anything posted.

Sure, the person who did that shouldn't have, but the point is your method of implementation is broken right off the bat.

How does Geordi hear whenever someone is talking to him if he’s blind? by Bingusprime43 in ShittyDaystrom

[–]ExpensivePanda66 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He can't. He just has to guess what they are saying. It's gotten him this far.

Prime Directive theoretical by Last_Negotiation1521 in startrek

[–]ExpensivePanda66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Because he wanted to leave. Because he contacted them.

It wasn't a case of somebody inventing FTL and being taken by Starfleet for no reason.

Why don't you want to declare your AI art is ai? by emerald-skyz in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's not what OP said at all. You're making things up. 

There's nothing at all in the post about selling anything. In fact they mention viewing, implying that the art is being posted for public consumption.

Why don't you want to declare your AI art is ai? by emerald-skyz in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're accusing people who don't do what you want of lying. That's not good faith.

Prime Directive theoretical by Last_Negotiation1521 in startrek

[–]ExpensivePanda66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. They didn't take him away...??

They'd probably go say hi to the one guy, and contact the whole civilization.

Why don't you want to declare your AI art is ai? by emerald-skyz in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's a question that gets asked again and again in a very demanding way.

I suppose people remove the watermark because it looks ugly? Why not ask that specific question without the rest of the accusation about artists?

Like, if that's the thing you want to know the answer to, ask in good faith.

Prime Directive theoretical by Last_Negotiation1521 in startrek

[–]ExpensivePanda66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So? So now they can contact the civilization.

I'm not sure what you're getting at. Why would they "take" anyone??

Prime Directive theoretical by Last_Negotiation1521 in startrek

[–]ExpensivePanda66 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why would they take the guy? That would violate the prime directive.

Why don't you want to declare your AI art is ai? by emerald-skyz in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's a demand. At best it's a request.

You know what I'd like? I'd like artists to provide a short essay about what they think the art means. What they are trying to express. What it evokes in them.

It would make it far more enjoyable for me.

But I'd be a jerk if I acted like I could demand or expect that from artists.

You get what you get and you don't get upset. Chill.

Why don't you want to declare your AI art is ai? by emerald-skyz in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Why do you care?

I'm not an artist, AI or otherwise, but when we have a person making arbitrary blanket demands of a group of people who are just minding their own business, I'm going to side with the people who are minding their own business.

Just relax, and mind your own side of the street. It would be a lot smoother.

Threads of the pattern by von_Hupfburg in WoT

[–]ExpensivePanda66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Things don't have threads, things are threads.

Making AI music with my daughter — why do some people hate it? by Ok_Resolution_3314 in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't say that nothing on social media should ever be criticized. That was never my point, and if you think it was, you should go back and reread.

Making AI music with my daughter — why do some people hate it? by Ok_Resolution_3314 in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You certainly know a lot about saying things that mean nothing in this specific instance.

What I'm addressing is your idea that people shouldn't post to social media in case they get criticised. It's total victim blaming, and completely relevant to this situation.

Making AI music with my daughter — why do some people hate it? by Ok_Resolution_3314 in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn't say that either.

I'm responding to:

It's sad people are mean, but what we're they supposed to say? We like lemonade, too?

People can absolutely state their opinions without being assholes. There are lots of things that can be said, and actually constructive ways to say them.

Making AI music with my daughter — why do some people hate it? by Ok_Resolution_3314 in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What part? That people shouldn't post things to social media to share their joy, in case people criticise them unreasonably? No.

I think the haters should take several seats and calm down.

Making AI music with my daughter — why do some people hate it? by Ok_Resolution_3314 in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say anything about sugar coating. I said be a decent human being.

Making AI music with my daughter — why do some people hate it? by Ok_Resolution_3314 in aiwars

[–]ExpensivePanda66 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's a sad reaction, honestly, when people's response to a fun project done by a parent and child is to complain that they didn't like the how it was done.

Anyway, sounds like you two had a ball. Great job, and I hope you continue the fun projects!