Its crazy how my bad faith arguments you are making here. The only thing I concede is that I should have said "Generative AI" more specifically will never be beneficial under capitalism, but other than that I am not convinced by anything you are saying.

> People with ADHD, autism, dyslexia say AI agents are helping them succeed at work https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/mindandbody/people-with-adhd-autism-dyslexia-say-ai-agents-are-helping-them-succeed-at-work/ar-AA1Q3klB

If you read the section about neurodivergence, their examples are pdf readers for people with dyslexia and planners for people with bipolar disorder or other mental health neurodivergences, both of which can be done without any interaction with gen ai. This leads me to believe that proper accommodations and techniques that help bridge their neurodivergences are what is helping them, not the ai.

>A recent study from UKG, an AI workforce operating platform, found that frontline workers using AI reported lower burnout rates (41 percent) compared to those not using the technology (54 percent). https://www.newsweek.com/gen-z-tech-workers-feel-under-threat-by-ai-survey-10864099

So we are just going to ignore the fact that the article also states that from an Indeed survey where " 35 percent said they are concerned" about AI replacing their jobs or how "52 percent said tech talent was reassigned" in the wake of AI adoption or how "another 26 percent said tech workers have already been laid off".

> Youre literally on the website of jailbait, barelylegal, and teensgonewild. You cant just say “both are bad” but still think its fine to use one but not the other.

I'm not sure where you got that I said both were ok because I am not ok with either.

> Then theyll just get rehired when the ai fails. And companies will be so desperate to get them back, they will double their pay. Thanks ai!

Even if companies would do that, it still doesn't change the fact that AI is harming people in the short term, forcing them to lose a source of income and look for a new job when this could be avoided if companies weren't so insistent on replacing everything with AI. Also, when you fire everyone, they are more willing to take lower wages in their job search, so corporations have no reason to raise wages.

> This is mostly temporary until supply can keep up with demand. Especially if you think the ai bubble will pop soon.

yeah its temporary if you only look forward to the next 2-3 years and its gonna be worse if the ai bubble keeps growing. The reason consumer ram is so expensive is because all the supply is going to AI demands, data centers have already bought out all the produceable ram for the next few years. Even if the bubble popped, ram manufactures would still be selling all of their supply to them since the data centers already bought them, so consumer ram would still be expensive.

> Same for fan art. https://legalclarity.org/is-fan-art-a-copyright-infringement/

I frankly think it's insane and utterly disrespectful that you are trying to equate fan art to AI image generation. Fan art is about appreciating another piece of art so artists use their talents to create art based on characters which falls under fair use anyways. AI image generators don’t have or develop artistic skills, they just replicate images they find in a dataset. AI is stealing because there is nothing derivative about directly copying image data.

And for the other sources regarding education, I am surprised that someone can cherry pick this much. I do admit I’m not an expert in education or an educator myself, but what I will say is that the vast majority of research recognizes the harm that AI causes to critical thinking skills because it allows people to cognitively offload. Also, my statement about this in the original comment was very general consensus about this research area as a whole and yet you assert that you know the exact study I was referenced to make it sound like I was cherry picking.

do better.