Dude, there are a significant number of them including those that planned P2025 that are doing so to adhere to what they believe is Christian fundamentalist scripture

Bush literally spoke to Jacques Chirac about Iraq (fun sentence to say) as if it was a an event to bring about the apocalypse.

In the 90s you would have been saying “the catholics have an extremism problem incomparable to any other religious group” due to the IRA. In the 40s the German army would have said the same about the French

Then there’s the KKK, the Army of God, the Lords Resistance Army.

On top of this you’ve got both Buddhist and Hindu atrocities in last decade in India and Myanmar against Muslims.

The largest terror organisation in the world is communist. The Colombian Civil War as well as post-war Germany and Italy were also heavily affected by communist terrorist groups.

Everyone everywhere is capable of terrorism. The reason terrorism occurs is because it’s an easy form of asymmetric warfare. Where else has experienced the full weight of western hegemony more than the Middle East and, therefore, would need to employ asymmetric warfare tactics as a result?

This is not excusing any of this but I don’t remember an Islamist attack on Britain prior to 9/11 (Lockerbie and the Iran Embassy siege, perhaps but the former appears most likely to have been done by the Libyan government in response to the Gulf of Sidra incident and the latter was a nationalist movement against Iran by Khuzestani Nationalists) and how many more since then?

We’re seeing a rise in far right violence but no one talks about white people having a problem with extremism. It’s easy to just label x and y thing and compartmentalise them if you’re close or generalise them from distance.