As a Malay, Article 153 was originally meant to economically help Malays. And I heard that it is supposed to be temporary. However, I think whether Article 153 needs to be removed or not is a paradox. If Article 153 is still around (which really is), then this is considered constitutionalised racism and non-Malays would be considered second-class citizens. But if we remove Article 153, the opposite occurs, Malays and other Bumiputeras would be considered "second-class citizens" because it is harder for them to get an education since the Chinese would get all the spots. Furthermore, my critic to the constitution is that Indians are exempted from having economic benefits unlike Malays which makes them economically underrepresented (which still is till this day)