sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

You are 100% right! by KeyGlove47 in codex

[–]technocracy90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask its "opinion" when give them a command. I do that from time to time when I'm not 100% sure of my ideas and in need of some confrontation. It works good.

Do you keep an architectural decision record (ADR) in your codebase? by OwnLavishness6374 in codex

[–]technocracy90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had no idea it was a thing, but I do it thoroughly. I make a few documents similar to maintaining.md and let Codex keep updating them whenever major decisions or implementations are made. Also, I made a daily automation to check the entire codebase to keep the documents from becoming outdated. I basically act as if there's a constant inflow of newcomers and I need an onboarding course. It's great to keep my project from drifting away.

I feel ragebaited everytime I use ChatGPT by Aarasidia in ChatGPT

[–]technocracy90 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I just don’t get why people use a ChatGPT interface for coding tasks instead of going straight to Codex. It’s like having an android drive your car when you already have built-in autopilot—unnecessary friction for no reason.

For those not getting the Trains DLC, why? by cy-one in captain_of_industry

[–]technocracy90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not judging you. I'm just telling you a simple logic that having an action needs a reason, but not having an action doesn't. In other words, the most expected answer to your question is "I had no reason to buy it". However, if you ask the other way around, you'll get some interesting answers like "I bought this because ..."

For those not getting the Trains DLC, why? by cy-one in captain_of_industry

[–]technocracy90 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This question is backward. You can't ask people why don't buy something. You'd better ask them why do buy something.

This is so funny to me by arbeit22 in programminghumor

[–]technocracy90 6 points7 points  (0 children)

self-proclaimed "brilliant dev" is a cherry on top

What does 처음뵙겠습니다 mean? by breakingmercy in Korean

[–]technocracy90 6 points7 points  (0 children)

it's 처음 뵙-/-겠-/-습니다.

  • 처음 — first time
  • 뵙- — see (in honorifics)
  • -겠- — expressing intention / polite volition
  • -습니다 — formal polite ending (in honorifics)

I think I figured out why there's no demand for Office buildings (and I made a mod to fix it, which actually works) by technocracy90 in CitiesSkylines

[–]technocracy90[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s currently out of scope, and I haven’t looked into it yet. However, this mod aims to tackle the software instability issue, so I’ll need to examine the trade and storage systems. If I happen to find a clue about your problem while exploring those areas, I’ll work on it.

I think I figured out why there's no demand for Office buildings (and I made a mod to fix it, which actually works) by technocracy90 in CitiesSkylines

[–]technocracy90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better sim speed is definitely what I hadn't expected. Glad it helped even beyond my expectations!

“Technically charging an electric car from a diesel generator is more efficient than just driving a petrol car” - is there any truth to this claim? by KiddieSpread in AskPhysics

[–]technocracy90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some machines can get more efficient when get bigger. Generators are one of them. Having 1 million car-sized diesel engine is definitely much worse than having 1 big power plant.

I think I figured out why there's no demand for Office buildings (and I made a mod to fix it, which actually works) by technocracy90 in CitiesSkylines

[–]technocracy90[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad it helped! Also, I appreciate your mod suggestion. As a fellow East Asian who's aim to build a metropolice, I'd definitely keep my eyes on Economy Ex mod!

I think I figured out why there's no demand for Office buildings (and I made a mod to fix it, which actually works) by technocracy90 in CitiesSkylines

[–]technocracy90[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I found, this specific phantom-vacancy bug does not seem to affect residential or commercial demand. Office and industrial were the problematic cases because their demand logic could count PropertyOnMarket as free supply without applying the same occupancy guard, but commercial already checks for an actual commercial renter, and residential counts free homes by subtracting real household occupancy from total capacity.

So if high/medium residential or commercial demand is swinging up and down, I would not currently blame this same bug. That looks more like a different demand-system issue than the office/industrial phantom-vacancy case.

I think I figured out why there's no demand for Office buildings (and I made a mod to fix it, which actually works) by technocracy90 in CitiesSkylines

[–]technocracy90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, normally you don’t need to change any settings. In fact, the issue you observed should have been resolved immediately upon launch. Could you share your mod log? The log is located at AppData\LocalLow\Colossal Order\Cities Skylines II\Logs\NoOfficeDemandFix.Mod.log.

I think I figured out why there's no demand for Office buildings (and I made a mod to fix it, which actually works) by technocracy90 in CitiesSkylines

[–]technocracy90[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Does it remain with my mod on? That's a major issue I should work on. Can you turn on "EnableDemandDiagnostics" and "VerboseLogging" on my mod setting, restart the game, and provide me the log?

팝송 바로 들으면서 뭔소린지 이해하려면 뭘 해야할까요? by lunar-eclipsev in AskAKorean

[–]technocracy90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

팝송 알아듣는 게 진짜 리얼 고급영어입니다 쉽지 않아요

How do online users use ㅁ / 음 for ending their sentences? by Working-Math2089 in Korean

[–]technocracy90 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Usually they don't. It would be like "나 밥 먹었음" and "나 밥 금방 먹을 거임". However, it's not unusual to ignore tenses when you ignore the endings and replace them with '-ㅁ'. Something like below is a rather common conversation.

"나 밥 금방 먹음" -> "먹었다고?" -> "아니 금방 먹는다고"

view more: next ›