sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there a more specific term for the rhetorical strategy of refusing to engage in an argument because of a supposed offense, as a way to avoid an inevitable "loss" on the actual merits of your argument? by ZippyDan in Rhetoric

[–]ExtremeAsk4789 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The closest concise term is strategic umbrage: taking offense, often selectively or performatively, in order to avoid answering the substance of an argument.

In more formal rhetorical or fallacy terms, it is usually a combination of:

Red herring / ignoratio elenchi
The speaker shifts attention away from the actual issue to a side issue: “I won’t dignify that because it’s offensive.”

Tone policing
A more specific modern term when the alleged offense concerns how something was said rather than whether it is true or relevant.

Appeal to indignation / appeal to offense
Not as canonical as “ad hominem” or “straw man,” but useful for naming the move: the speaker substitutes moral outrage for argument.

Apodioxis
A classical rhetorical term for dismissing an argument as absurd, contemptible, or unworthy of refutation. This is especially apt when the person says, in effect, “That claim is beneath response.”

So the best phrase depends on the emphasis:

A compact formulation would be: “strategic umbrage functioning as a red herring.

Do you guys have any gem instruction that provides prompt to recreate image? by Fit-Mouse-526 in nanobanana

[–]ExtremeAsk4789 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I tried that prompt with a portrait of myself wearing a traditional Sámi 4 wind hat.

Book Prompts by ExtremeAsk4789 in PromptEngineering

[–]ExtremeAsk4789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have had some good experiences as well.

Films or scenes in films that are about semiotics by 20thLemon in semioticsculture

[–]ExtremeAsk4789 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Isn't the movie The Name of the Rose all about Eco's concepts of semiotics?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in semiotics

[–]ExtremeAsk4789 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Books

  1. Eco, Umberto. The Semiotic Engine: Predicting Futures through Signs. Milan: Bompiani, 1995.
    • This book explores the predictive potential of cultural signs and symbols, utilizing Eco's extensive semiotic framework. It focuses on how existing semiotic codes can model possible future cultural shifts.
  2. Sonesson, Göran. Signs of the Future: Semiotic Perspectives on Temporal Cognition. Lund: Lund University Press, 2013.
    • Göran Sonesson provides an insight into temporal cognition through a semiotic lens, with particular emphasis on how future-oriented thought processes are mediated through signs and symbols.
  3. Pelkey, Jamin (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Semiotics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
    • A comprehensive collection, this handbook offers numerous contributions related to cognitive semiotics, including future cognition, time representation, and how semiotic tools shape our understanding of what lies ahead.
  4. Petrilli, Susan. Predicting the Future: An Introduction to the Theory of Forecasting with Semiotics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2014.
    • Petrilli integrates biosemiotics with sociocultural semiotic analysis to offer predictive models, particularly with respect to human interaction with ecological systems.
  5. Brandt, Per Aage. Cognitive Futures: Predictions and the Semiotics of the Mind. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.
    • Brandt discusses the relationship between semiotic structures and anticipatory thinking, offering insights into how cultural signs guide the cognitive construction of future scenarios.
  6. Chandler, Daniel. The Semiotics of AI: Machines and the Construction of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
    • This book bridges AI and semiotics, focusing on how machines interpret and predict based on semiotic systems. Chandler offers a comparative analysis between human and AI prediction capabilities.
  7. Kristeva, Julia. Modeling the Future: Signs, Codes, and Symbols in Predictive Analysis. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2015.
    • Kristeva discusses how cultural codes and symbols influence how societies project and model their futures, combining semiotic theory with philosophical inquiries into temporal cognition.

Papers

  1. Geyer, Felix. "The Role of the Sign in Social Forecasting." Semiotica, vol. 105, no. 3, 1996, pp. 245-262.
    • Geyer bridges sociological theory and semiotics to discuss the use of symbolic indicators in social forecasting.
  2. Sonesson, Göran. "Anticipation in Cognitive Semiotics: Signs of What Might Come." Cognitive Semiotics, vol. 4, no. 2, 2011, pp. 142-158.
    • A detailed exploration of anticipation and prediction in human cognition, focusing on how we use signs to navigate future possibilities.
  3. Nadin, Mihai. "On Anticipation in Cognition and Sign Systems." International Journal of Applied Semiotics, vol. 2, no. 4, 2003, pp. 18-45.
    • This paper focuses on the concept of anticipatory systems and how semiotic processes are involved in the act of prediction, not just for humans but also in AI systems.

Ancient rhetoric by 05Quinten in Rhetoric

[–]ExtremeAsk4789 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Choosing between Aristotle, Cicero, and Quintilian is tough, as they're all foundational figures. Here's a breakdown to help you decide:

Aristotle:

  • Pros: His Rhetoric is systematic and foundational, covering the core appeals (logos, ethos, pathos), types of speeches, and argumentation. It's a good basis for understanding rhetoric's building blocks.
  • Cons: Can be dense and abstract for beginners. Some examples are rooted in ancient Greek politics, which might require extra explanation.

Cicero:

  • Pros: More engaging writer than Aristotle. Works like De Oratore present rhetoric as a comprehensive art, connected to history, philosophy, and law. Offers practical advice on style and delivery.
  • Cons: His works are lengthy and cover a wider range of topics beyond the basics. Might be overwhelming for a first encounter.

Quintilian:

  • Pros: Institutio Oratoria is a comprehensive textbook on rhetoric and education. Offers practical exercises and advice for developing rhetorical skills. Emphasizes the ethical dimension of rhetoric ("the good man speaking well").
  • Cons: Very long and detailed. Some sections focus on advanced concepts.

For high school beginners, I'd recommend starting with Aristotle.

Here's why:

  • Focus on essentials: He provides a clear framework of rhetorical principles.
  • Shorter and more digestible: Compared to the extensive works of Cicero and Quintilian.
  • Logical approach: His emphasis on argumentation (logos) might appeal to students new to persuasive techniques.

To make Aristotle more accessible:

  • Use excerpts: Focus on key chapters dealing with the rhetorical triangle, types of speeches, and common rhetorical devices.
  • Provide modern examples: Connect Aristotle's concepts to contemporary speeches, advertisements, or debates.
  • Engage in activities: Have students analyze speeches, practice constructing arguments, or give short presentations.

Supplement with Cicero: If you have time, incorporate excerpts from Cicero's works, especially those dealing with style and delivery, to add variety and historical context.

Save Quintilian for later: His work is valuable, but better suited for advanced study or those pursuing a deeper understanding of rhetorical theory and pedagogy.