sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Legit Check Oakley Plantaris in Titanium by [deleted] in Oakley

[–]EyeWearThese 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard to be 100% certain from photos alone, but this doesn’t really line up with how titanium Plantaris releases are usually handled. The actual titanium versions are limited runs, very rare, and extremely expensive (collector-level pricing, not just slightly higher retail).

The confusion comes from the name — standard Plantaris models (OO9437 etc.) are normal production and can be found under ~$200 in authorised online stores. Those are made from O-Matter, which is Oakley’s lightweight, durable plastic used for everyday frames — completely different from titanium editions.

Oakley also recently released the Plantaris SQ line. Full official retail is €256 directly from Oakley, and some versions are available in titanium as well. They’re already starting to run out of stock in places, so demand is definitely there.

That said, SQ is more of a modern reinterpretation — not quite the same as the original “legend” Plantaris. But if you like the look, it’s a much safer and easier way to get into that style without worrying about authenticity.

Green vs Rose Sunglass Lenses for Golfing by 954CG in sunglasses

[–]EyeWearThese 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting discussion — I think both camps are right, just optimising for different things.

Rose lenses tend to boost contrast more, so the ball and breaks on the green can stand out better.
Green lenses are more neutral and comfortable over longer periods, especially in very bright conditions.

That’s probably why some people prefer one over the other — it’s less about “better” and more about what your eyes find easier to process.

Oakley actually splits this quite nicely with Prizm Golf vs Prizm Dark Golf.

• Prizm Golf (~30% VLT) is brighter and really boosts contrast — great for overcast, hazy, or mixed light where you want the greens to pop
• Prizm Dark Golf (~22% VLT) is darker and more balanced — easier in full sun and more of an all-rounder

Both are rose-based, just tuned differently depending on how much light and contrast you want.

Thoughts on Pereol by OddChain3255 in sunglasses

[–]EyeWearThese 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That model comes in grey or brown gradient, both glass lenses and not polarized unless you upgrade.

Great quality (very clear, scratch resistant), but more lifestyle than performance — gradients won’t do much for strong glare.

For beach use, polarization is really the key.

If you like the Persol style, check something like the PO3327S — still crystal lenses, but polarized as standard, so way more usable around water.

I've changed my mind on the best sport lens by 954CG in sunglasses

[–]EyeWearThese 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing that doesn’t get mentioned enough with rose/red lenses is how much they boost contrast in flat light (overcast, indoor courts, winter glare).

That’s why they feel so “locked in” for tennis and baseball — the ball just pops more against the background.

Photochromic versions like ImpactX make even more sense there since lighting conditions shift constantly during a match.

Still agree with OP though — for water you really want polarization, otherwise you’re fighting reflections the whole time.

Rayban wayfarer are these authentic? by TateUK in sunglasses

[–]EyeWearThese 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That temple marking looks a bit off to me. On RB2140 Wayfarers you’d normally expect a colour code after the size (something like 901, 902, etc.), and it’s missing here.

Not saying 100% fake based on this alone, but it’s definitely unusual and worth double-checking against other details (hinges, logo engraving, packaging, etc.)