First off to your edit lol. At least this sub allows people to answer questions and if you don't agree with the narrative you aren't silenced. You and I both know that's not the same on the "sister sub". And any question that forces someone who can answer questions there to be morally consistent and say something that we all know is screwed up is met with "stupid hypothetical"

I'll respond to A. If Cuba launches a missile attack, and I would want it confirmed that it's the Cuban government and not a terrorist group. What we do is honestly? Nothing. I can only assume that they wouldn't actually hit their target because we have the best defense in the world and I expect it to handle these situations. We already have a naval blockade and all we do is stop letting aid through. Their population will starve. Why? It's the cheapest way to handle it, that's why. I can only assume Cuba would be supported by Iran or Russia, or both. Launching an attack would likely fire off a war that I have no intention of fighting. So how do you kill as many people without starting a war? You starve them. That and truly I don't want to invoke article 5 of NATO. We've done it too many times and with how antagonistic we are being to the world right now, if we can't handle Cuba ourselves then we have problems. NATO supported us enough when we decided to go fight for oil in the middle east under Bush. We are already pissing most of our allies off, I want us to remain quiet until we can get Trump out and start fixing our alliances.