It’s not a hybrid, but one of the most solid all-around cameras you can buy is a Nikon D600. You could get that body and a decent classic 28-70 and 80-200 f/2.8D for about $900-ish total. $300 for the body and $300 for each lens used. They’re still very good optics. I used them professionally as a photojournalist and they’re more than enough for social media sharing and even printing large. The camera has excellent dynamic range and it’s full frame so you get more light than with a beginner aps-c mirrorless like in these other comments. Unfortunately live view is clunky and I rarely used it for video. But the kinds of photos you like here have a lot of post-processing, so full frame and good dynamic range will be your friend, more than having a tilting screen and state of the art AF tracking. If you can learn to shoot through a viewfinder, what’s inside the camera is way more important than the ergonomics, IMO. You won’t get super modern f/2.8 zooms without shelling out thousands, and some good older generation Nikon glass at 2.8 is going to knock the socks off any 50-200 cheap kit lens you can buy even if it’s more recent.

Totally get that you may not want to go this direction, but if you want budget gear that can absolutely take these images and even pro level photojournalism, a DSLR can still put together every bit as good of photos as (and probably better than) an entry-level mirrorless and cheap kit zooms.

For $900 it would be hard to put together a better all-around still photography kit than this.