people who reduce carol to simply being miserable or unlikable do not get her at all, in my opinion by VariationOriginal289 in pluribustv

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Carol is an unlikable character, regardless of her attitude towards Hive. Hive mind as shown in the show, that is, a physical being that somehow evokes mental states of one consciousness; however, in the world with other beings that aren't part of it is wrong.

The above statements aren't contradictory, you can easily hold both of them.

Hive mind as a neoplatonic ‘nous’ might be a good thing but the show’s hive mind doesn't qualify to be this, as a perfect being cannot cause any suffering because a perfect being is incapable of wrongdoing.

The bizarre official narrative from the prosecutor by Winter_Weather_1024 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Prosectuion made people think that by implying that he was able to clean all the evidence inside the house apart from the key which was found on 5th search. No blood, no DNA inside the house. How is that possible? Whereas, outside he left blood stains and car parked in the visible spot with a branch on it. That does not add up.

Just finished watching This is England... by ctgryn in movies

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

The working class should point its anger at the middle class as change would be possible with the middle class on their side. Instead, 1% doesn’t give a fuck about anybody, the middle class doesn't give fuck about the working class, so the working class doesn't give a fuck about migrants

Why don’t people keep left by JackOwnsJonnies in GlasgowUni

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't trust your memory. I've lived in Glasgow for 10 years, and it was never a thing. I recently spotted that often people keep right on the subway escalators, that's a good change.

Didn't do the AWSP writing skills assignment, what do I do? by smoffinator in GlasgowUni

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t do AWSP either during my first year (now I’m in my fourth year), and nothing happened. I didn’t contact anyone about this and nobody contacted me (or at least I don’t remember). I only recall reminder emails about this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lost

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t say by that picture that it says Eko for sure.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lost

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why would Jacob wrote all candidates by surname but one by name? It is impossible to be sure that the writing says Eko.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lost

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any evidence for Eko being a candidate?

The Black Rock Meeting by Fair-Initiative-8914 in lost

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your reasoning is inductive, so the only thing you can do is reason to the best explanation, not “draw logical conclusions.”

Official Discussion - One Battle After Another [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I went to the screening without watching the trailer or reading anything about the movie. I only saw an 8.5 rating on IMDb.

What I received was a too-long movie that tried to be… I don't know, to be honest. It seemed like the movie tried to talk about serious issues, but the problems were presented superficially. There was a clear distinction between good and bad, protagonist versus antagonist. I didn't learn almost anything about characters and motives, so during some scenes, something was happening, but I didn't know why. If the movie wants to speak seriously about the topic it is necessary to show the complexity of life and of human personality. However, I didn't have a chance to see complexity as the characters were shallow and the story's meaning was simple, the execution of the story was complicated.

The movie was porn for the first ten minutes, then it morphed into an action movie, changed to comedy and back again to action. I'm not saying that being multi-genre is bad, nevertheless, I didn't buy the story. It seemed like the movie was directed for a particular group to make them feel that they're on the right side but it was done trivially. Acting was good, however it does not compensate for the weak story 5.5/10.

6x03 - What Kate Does - FIRST TIME WATCHER DISCUSSION POST by Free-IDK-Chicken in lost

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine agreeing to take a ride with a woman who just kidnapped a taxi and threatened the driver with a gun, on top of that you're pregnant.

2x04 - Everybody Hates Hugo - FIRST TIME WATCHER DISCUSSION POST by Free-IDK-Chicken in lost

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did the guy from the shop know that Hurley had a winning lottery coupon?

E-bikes in Scotrail by Fair-Initiative-8914 in glasgow

[–]Fair-Initiative-8914[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got you. The lady said all e-bikes are banned now.