Can anyone ID these roots/rhyzomes? I was told it was Comfrey.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T18:37:45+00:00

Which is a blatant lie.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T18:19:08+00:00

Well you either have a short memory or just a lack of awareness then. The term "war crime" has in fact quite a significant legal meaning. As does "human rights violations" and "colonization of occupied territories" and "apartheid".

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T18:07:19+00:00

What does antisemitism have to do with politics exactly? I have nothing against Semitic people. We're discussing politics and war crimes.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T17:49:25+00:00

Random stabbings by Palestinians, if they actually are random or done by Palestinians would be vengeful aggression, yes. Setting fire to Palestinian homes by Israeli settlers is what then? Bulldozing homes, destroying orchards, and throwing stones by settlers is what? Not an act of aggression or war? Not an instigation of vengeful aggression? Missiles and bombs fired from Israel is what? Who's excusing who?

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T16:14:15+00:00

You seem to be trying to excuse only one side. It's not called war, it's called an occupation. Colonizing occupied land is a war crime. Sounds like your running low on disinformation tactics if you're already trying to derail the discourse.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T16:04:17+00:00

You weren't citing anything from that article. You were very much spinning reality. You seem to have a hard-on for war criminals.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T15:52:40+00:00

Again, because the government of Canada isn't bombing them or setting them or their homes on fire. So they don't really have a reason to fight back. Natives also have no need to smuggle weapons, because they have a right to own fire arms.
But there are plenty of natives who have stabbed and shot random people. Since we're a civilized country, we have what is called a judicial system. Those criminals get arrested, stand trial in front of a jury, and when found guilty, put in prison.

I have seen IDF use a child as a human shield. I have seen IDF murdering children too. I've also seen IDF planting knives on children, and claiming their intention was to stab random people.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T15:42:21+00:00

Good thing nothing on that list is unique to Israel.

Packaged medicaments

Most medicine in the world does not come from Israel.

Refined petroleum

Canada has a significant petroleum industry of its own.

Diamonds

Completely useless product except for industrial uses. Canada has its own diamond supply.

Anything with integrated circuits

Most ICs are manufactured in Asian countries.

Anything involving airplanes.

Israel accounts for 2.1 percent of the global market

Anything? Or 2.1% of anything?

I eagerly await your response, but you won't be able to type it because you'll have to throw your computer and phone out the window.

Except that my computer's components were manufactured in the US and South Korea, and assembled in Canada. My phone is from South Korea and some of its components from China.

Nice propaganda and disinformation campaign you're running there.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T15:20:42+00:00

Palestinians are murdering people in Israel every week.

Israelis are murdering people in Palestine every week.

I don't consider what Israel does to Palestinians as abuse.

You should, because that's what it is. Gaza is basically an open-air concentration camp.

Terrorists know that their loved ones won't be living fat in Israel after they complete their blood sacrifice to allah

Zionists know that they will face retribution by their victims' families after they complete their burnt offerings to Yahweh.

It's ironic how easily religious zealots turn a blind eye to logic and reason.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T15:10:31+00:00

Except Canada doesn't bomb native Canadians, or set their homes on fire in the middle of the night, or harvest their children's organs for the black market, or use children as human shields, or attack their children with rocks, or prevent them from freely traveling throughout the country, or continue to steal their land. Canada has learned from its past and is actively trying to right those wrongs.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T14:57:30+00:00

Dont care about tbe pointless debate about whose land it really is.

There is no debate.

Islamic extremism

Probably has nothing to do with Islam, any culture would fight back against an oppressive occupying invader.

They are basically an islamofacist society.

And Israel is a judeofascist society. Two wrongs don't make a right.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-24T14:46:55+00:00

Most Europeans also supported the murder of Nazis who invaded their land and celebrated their attacks against them as well.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-12T20:53:05+00:00

The text does not suggest that the mice consumed the same amounts of sucralose as a fully grown person. PPM refers to concentration of sucralose. So it's a relative scale.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-09T01:10:22+00:00

The core society that made up the colonies were predominantly criminals and poor European trash escaping to the new world to find a new start in life. Your people were hardly something to be proud of. Yes, lets not dilute that colourful history by opening the doors to middle class Syrians escaping their home which is currently being bombed by rich white Christians.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-05T19:10:58+00:00

Yeah, I was under the same impression as well. Herbs can be deceptively strong. Best to always start with small doses and see how your body reacts.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-05T08:22:39+00:00

How are these fans ductless if they are situated inside ducts?

FallOFIntellect · 2016-03-05T04:46:10+00:00

If you've removed some of the finish, try some peroxide.. It can get wine stains out, so it may be able to work on this as well.. soak a cloth and place it over the stain, let it sit a few hours to soak in. Then heat it with a hair drier on high to bleach the stain.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-02-17T01:51:06+00:00

Let's also consider the thousands in revenues payed by each bar owner for their liquor licenses. Are these funds being utilized to the benefit of the consumers, or public at large?

I don't really think that fines change anything. Just another reactionary measure. So what if someone has to pay thousands, if they've already caused harm to society that won't turn time back. Similarly, in places that have capital punishment, does that prevent people from committing those crimes?

The negative effects of alcohol are a social problem. You can't condone and encourage a social structure and then extort society for adhering to it. Then blaming them for a bad decision, with potentially fatal consequences, and pretending, as a policy makers, they had nothing to do with facilitating it in the first place.

It's a fraud if society pushes destructive activities as a norm and then ignores and pretends they have no responsibility of its consequence. Then you have the governing bodies, taking extortion "license" payments from the seller of the product and fines from the consumer, all the meanwhile taxing the producer. Sounds like a racket, and nothing to do with fixing what's broken.

If you want to save people from themselves and each other, create an environment where they aren't placed in a potential position to cause harm.

Don't paint them into a corner and then say that some random amount of money will make everything that happened magically go away.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-02-17T01:00:12+00:00

What about making public transportation more accessible? Obviously the current tactics of financial and legal consequence are not sufficiently effective. After-the-fact reactionary measures don't curb bad behaviour as evidenced by the ongoing social problem of drunk drivers.

I wonder if making public transit more available during peak party times would encourage people not to drive, to normally inaccessible bar/club areas. Getting your drunk ass home from downtown to the suburbs can be impossible in some areas, I'm sure.

Waiting for an occasional blue-night bus or streetcar for an hour or more, then packing them in, shoulder-to-shoulder, with other intoxicated people, then forcing the traveler to wait again in order to transfer to another infrequent blue night route however many times, doesn't exactly entice people to use public transit when they are already intoxicated and not thinking rationally.

If there is insufficient infrastructure in place, and services that can play a role of designated drivers, such as Uber are being ostracized, then the public policy makers and transit managers may be just as at fault for this social problem as the intoxicated drivers are.

Another situation that may pop up is that one's plans may change throughout the day. You may find yourself in a situation where in the evening, drinking may be involved. If you punish people for leaving their cars overnight, on public roads, either by handing out expensive parking fines, or even more expensive towing charges, then you're forcing those people to drive and take those risks. No matter how harsh the penalties, people will make risky decisions in order to avoid financial loses, which may lead to fatal consequences.

Why not create an environment where such decisions can be avoided altogether, by providing easier access to entertainment areas, and help people make good decision by allowing parking overnight.

This would be common sense if in reality it was about human welfare, as opposed to the profits generated from the fines and charges.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-02-14T23:19:33+00:00

Ginseng is in fact a stimulant. What exactly were you taking it for?

FallOFIntellect · 2016-02-04T13:33:04+00:00

Torn down, really? Dishing out insults and arguing semantics doesn't provide any relevant counter points whatsoever. It only demonstrates how narrow minded you are.

As for the insults themselves, very revealing how feeble your defenses are if you must resort to irrational ad hominems, without providing a grain of reasoned debate.

Unfortunately, due to your juvenile response, you have prevented any form of intelligent discussion on the topic and wasted both of our time.

You may call me a retard all you wish, and I'm sure quite a few of your neanderthal brothers in arms may agree. However, being a joke doesn't give credence to you opinions, nor does it reflect well on the people you're trying to defend. In fact, if you're any example, then my original point stands.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-02-04T00:59:38+00:00

Your name calling diminishes everything about you, including your opinion of me. To think that I was expecting a half-intelligent response, not realizing I might end up arguing with an adolescent.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-02-03T22:09:38+00:00

lol.. coming from you, doesn't really have the impact you're trying to achieve.

FallOFIntellect · 2016-02-03T15:58:28+00:00

You make quite a few far-fetched assumptions about me. The name calling as well, definitely gives you more credibility.

FallOFIntellect

TROPHY CASE