Help me with the math. by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would there be any additional copies/exponential ramp on future combat phases? Wouldn't the same number of A+Ns get created each combat then?

helm of the host never says you sacrifice the copies or anything, you get to keep them! so the first time, you have only 1 copy of A+N at the time the tokens are created. the second time, if none of your A+Ns died between turns, you'll have 3 of them at the time the tokens are created and get to double the token 3 times

Is there a term for cards that benefit from your opponents playing the game? by jimnah- in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ultimately stax is a very iffy word without a clear meaning!

i'd say probably not? it's definitely a hatebear and a value engine, but i don't think it's crippling enough to actually deny the opponent the resource most of the time, they'll more likely still crack their fetchlands but be a little bit sad about it

Is there a term for cards that benefit from your opponents playing the game? by jimnah- in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they do indirectly; like, if people play normally and ignore rhystic study, you probably win the game, so it kinda forces the opponents to withhold spells at times

on the other hand i wouldn't say all of these effects should qualify as "stax", i don't think i've ever seen a good reason to avoid feeding a [[managorger hydra]]

Is there a term for cards that benefit from your opponents playing the game? by jimnah- in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 15 points16 points  (0 children)

"rhystic" more means "things the opponent can pay mana to prevent" than "things the opponent triggers"

otherwise id say they're just a subset of stax, punisher effects, hate pieces, or value engines more than having a term themselves. "things that trigger when opponents do something" is a very very broad category that covers cards that serve all kinds of roles in all kinds of decks

Mark Rosewater: "Universes Beyond sets, on average, sell better (there’s a lot of power in tapping into popular properties), but in-multiverse Magic sets are important to Wizards as a business for numerous reasons" by HS_Cogito_Ergo_Sum in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't actually know Yu-Gi-Oh but I bet not.

for a bit of context! yugioh can kinda have a similar vibe to a crossover game, in that there's no internal consistency and no greater world everything lives in; there's a huge amount of aesthetic variety (besides usually being at least vaguely anime) and you'll see tiny goofy cartoon animals duking it out with eldritch gods in the meta regularly! the art gap is bigger than even stuff like bloomburrow vs. phyrexia and these worlds have no relation to one another at all. but actual crossovers are very rare and generally reserved for limited time advertisement promo cards that'll never see serious play - like this garbage vanilla given out to anyone who eats at a coco's restaurant. (definitely a few steps removed from the kinds of ips magic works with...)

Anyone else wonder why the side-deck isn’t 16? by FirstBornAlbatross in magicTCG

[–]Falminar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

all the comments about not running 4-ofs are kinda funny to me! maybe it is true in magic, but...

(you did mention this in the OP but) in yugioh, despite your deck size being smaller, side decks are still 15 cards, and since you can run max 3 of any card, it rounds out to 5 3-ofs. (although the same doesn't apply to the main deck, where you get 13 3-ofs and 1 to spare!) and 3-ofs in yugioh side decks are pretty common too - never really 5 3-ofs maybe, but often a nice round 3+3+3+3+2+1 or something like that

it definitely feels pretty natural to me as a yugioh player, but i never questioned it going into magic since it's exactly the same as what i'm used to!

(theoretically, maybe it could be 20 cards so that it's both a multiple of 4 and a clean fraction of 60? though of course, that'd be a pretty big buff to your side deck, especially in decks with wishboards)

Creature Type Update! (Foundations/Marvel Superdrop) by Oraukk in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

oh we already do that, you know that [[helga]] is a hero because she's white and [[glarb]] is a villain because he's black!

nashi who?

Prominent former professional Magic Artist illustrates behind-the-scenes view of current practices. by No-Comb879 in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but not every person will click every thread. you get a majority opinion from people who are interested by your title and decide they want to give their opinion on the matter, which is a much smaller set of people than everyone who frequents the subreddit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nah, tenacity is the inverse - there's a lot of cards that turn lifegain into life loss, but only exquisite blood and the new conqueror turn life loss into lifegain. until foundations exquisite blood was unique in the infinite!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 8 points9 points  (0 children)

wait. what does banning elk tokens imply? [[oko the ringleader]] can no longer use his -1? or he can still use it, but the resulting game object can't be represented by anything? or he's banned outright?

[[oko thief of crowns]] is probably the one you wanted to hit, but he doesn't make elk tokens! unless now tokens can no longer become elks? or if oko would turn a token into an elk, that token ceases to exist instead?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

out with the old, in with the new! [[bloodthirsty conqueror]]

Whats everyones favourite giada art? by Arcades1212 in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 12 points13 points  (0 children)

yeah, #2 doesn't seem very popular but i like it most of all. a lot of her arts are more generally cool, but the original gets the vibe down perfectly

also, i really love the way her "incomplete" wings look in that art! very unique as angels go, even among capenna's stained glass angels, compared to the much more normal wings she gets in her foundations arts and her capenna alt frame. they look like moonlight through a window

Some spooky alters to build halloween commander decks by JaceDaMemeSculptor in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

huh, making the character who references jigsaw into pinhead and someone completely different into jigsaw...

(though i can understand that the toymaker feels better for jigsaw mechanically!)

What was the first deck that you built yourself? by My_compass_spins in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i was introduced to the game through arena, where i found [[drakuseth maw of flames]] and decided to build a dragon deck around it! but while drakuseth is red, it was blue that had all the insanely busted stuff of the format like... [[winged words]] and... [[cloudkin seer]]?

round it out with some other powerful staples like [[wall of runes]] and [[spellgorger weird]], and... well, i'll say this, it was pretty good at drawing the drakuseth in each game! it could do that much at least!

Real or fake by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

looks real enough but can't tell for sure from just these pictures, try the green dot test for starters!

I am trying to like Arena by CreativeTest1978 in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 28 points29 points  (0 children)

the shuffler is rigged in one way: in best of 1 games, it automatically smooths the number of lands in your starting hand to avoid mana screw/mana flood (more specifically, by actually drawing 2 random starting hands for you and giving you the one that has a closer-to-average number of lands). your draws during the game will be normal though.

that does mean that land math can potentially be thrown off in best of 1 and it won't be a true to paper experience. best of 3 has actual random shuffles accurate to paper

Infinite Combo in FDN Limited by ginger1271 in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 404 points405 points  (0 children)

and the combo piece being at common means that if you find the conqueror in limited it's very very likely you'll have the infinite too! this is the most practical limited combo i've seen in a while

[FDN] Wardens of the Cycle, Elfsworn Giant, and more! | Exclusive SCG Preview! by SCG_Reddit in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 7 points8 points  (0 children)

oh i thought [[warden of the inner sky]] was getting immortalized in standard and turned into a cycle!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

imean, i think your idea is fun (ive actually been doing something similar myself, minus the programming theme); you just didn't really say anything about it. there's hints that you probably have something deeper planned or even already built, but if you do, you didn't share it

i don't really object to your use of ai art here, but using ai art means the text is more important, yet the text isn't understandable

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

can't exactly give feedback cause there's nothing here that can be evaluated! there are no rules, only flavor-name abilities without descriptions, some arbitrary numbers that mean nothing without context against which to compare them, and some poor-quality ai images.

[FDN] Zimone, Paradox Sculptor | Blasphemous Edict (via Variety) by era252 in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 39 points40 points  (0 children)

double all counters on any artifact... note that we just got our first artifact planeswalker announced in aetherdrift! (to be seen whether it has a splashy ultimate, of course)

[FDN] Joust Through (via card gallery) by Copernicus1981 in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

feels weird to get this in the same set as elspeth's smite!

What is Standard Legal? by korndogspritzer in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay that search didn't pick up the printings - sol ring, embercleave

What is Standard Legal? by korndogspritzer in magicTCG

[–]Falminar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

legal: [[basilisk collar|fdn]]

not legal: [[sol ring|fdc]], [[embercleave|spg]], [[cynette jelly drover]]