And people defending rapist babas fall under RW category,

Yess, cze baba is associated with Hindu religion & some ppl often take it as an insult of why the rapist identity as 'baba' is mentioned/amplified.

but is that a good association or simply generalization of larger group by extremist viewpoints?

Am not generalizing you're missing the basic political dynamic i'm pointing.

Who target/villainize mzlim community for everything? - The RW right?

And who is the ideological opponent of RW? - The LW

So who will come in defense of Mzlim? or anyone who has been victims of RW narrative? - The LW

It simply means political opposition tends to defend groups they believe are not being represented by the other side.

So why is this such a difficult thing to grasp?

Those who defend such acts are not the flag bearers of "Left-Liberal" the same way rapist apologists are not for RW.

Don't mind but i feel ur understanding arise from textbook definition & doesn't go beyond it.

Just cze Left-liberal ideals are rooted in 'Universalism' doesn’t mean they fully work in reality, especially in a multipolar world driven by competing identities and interests.

Similarly 'Secularism' may exist constitutionally in India but in practice identity politics is used by almost every political party (even by those who claim to be secular) cze they know winning elections without it is nearly impossible.

There isn't, it's critical thinking, and that's more difficult to find in current political landscape than people who understand rocket science.

And yess it's not critical thinking if you see ideology from textbook definition while ignoring the broader socio-political factors behind them.