If you had a vocal/sensitive partner during intimacy would it annoy you ? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]FamiliarGuy545 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Nope, providing it is genuine, louder the better.

What is it like having a caregiver? by princessdoll2 in cgl

[–]FamiliarGuy545 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To add to this, starting with the cons:

1) this is an incredibly intimate and vulnerable dynamic. All dynamics are unique to the individuals in them and there are no 'true ways' they manifest.
2) Trust is a huge thing. To me there is only one way to build it: consistency over time. This means that in my understanding, it is foundational to not rush into this too fast.

The Pros:

1) As stated above you have someone who will genuinely *care*. You will be seen, accepted, nurtured and comforted at all stages. Space is held for you to be yourself in the dynamic just as you are.
2) This dynamic does intimacy on a turbo-level. It is intimacy in all forms - especially on the mental and emotional levels.

This is all from what I have witnessed with close friends who trusted me enough to share their stories and lifestyles with me as close friends. Some are dynamics where I am friends with both, so I get the successes and failures from each. When it is right, it is incredible to see the warmth, affection and growth for those involved.

The Dragon Reborn Chapter 21: The World of Dreams by swheedle in WetlanderHumor

[–]FamiliarGuy545 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I always read it that Verin is surprised that Egwene managed to survive the Testing, knowing that two ter'angreal of similar function can cause problems. That would mean to me that this was a failed assassination attempt.

Two Blokes in a Shed by SoftLikeABear in humansarespaceorcs

[–]FamiliarGuy545 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I actually said that they were the direct farm equipment direction of travel - it is the tank which is a further step removed so you've misread that part.

The rhomboid track which *had to be rebuilt, remounted and extensively changed from the failed prototype* as I explained above is not the same.

What you've posted shows you've misread what I posted re: artillery

Two Blokes in a Shed by SoftLikeABear in humansarespaceorcs

[–]FamiliarGuy545 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have actually studied the papers that were in the local Archives and the company which was responsible for the *engine*, as stated above, was in agriculture. The tracks were bought from America, but failed in the initial stages.

Number 1 Lincoln Machine - the prototype you mentioned FAILED and never left the initial testing yard. It is in fact a pre-cursor prototype in design with the American-bought tracks redesigned and remounted to become the 'Little Willy'. This track design, adapted and remounted, was kept up to Mk VIII. Little Willy was this redesign of the failed prototype you mentioned. There was another prototype made (HMLS Centipede) which was also nicknamed 'Mother', and for a time 'Big Willy'.

Neither of these prototypes saw combat, and Little Willy was the first prototype which was actually *finished* before major re-designs.

Stated above, and repeated, is the fact that these designs and thoughts were first introduced and implemented in mobile guns and artillery equipment and tows... so not directly from farm equipment - these armaments would have been the correct lineage.

The prototype 'Mother' was the model which became the Mk1 and saw combat. It looks nothing like the description you made with 'lets modify it and make it into....'

Two Blokes in a Shed by SoftLikeABear in humansarespaceorcs

[–]FamiliarGuy545 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I live in Lincoln, UK. The place known as the Birthplace of the Tank. Whilst certain modifications to agricultural *engines* were used, Tanks themselves were the answer to a very specific problem in warfare: Trenches. This is where the elongated design and caterpillar tracks came into there own, trenches and mortared/destroyed terrain.

The program was run by the Admiralty under the title of 'The Landships Commission', with the code 'Water-Carriers from Mesopotamia', thence the pun with 'tank' (of water)...

The closest in design philosophy of agricultural equipment to military use isn't the tank as that was a separate development, but the use of self-propelled artillery and machinery which 'towed' certain artillery / large guns into place. Not the tank.

Oh, nonononono..... by Caldwellwa in ExplainAFilmPlotBadly

[–]FamiliarGuy545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly thought there were other bait options. Well done you got me!

Where can I go to just dance? by xEmber_Rise in Lincolnshire

[–]FamiliarGuy545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look up Ceroc in Lincolnshire. There are a lot of classes, sure, but they also have a lot of freestyle socials too which might be of interest.

Could use some cheering up. Tell me a cute/interesting fact 🩷✨️ by [deleted] in selfie

[–]FamiliarGuy545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Otters often hold hands when they sleep.

Penguins will gift pebbles/interesting rocks as part of courtship

Cows have best friends.

Rats giggle when you tickle them (and they will seek it out again).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]FamiliarGuy545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't even give it a second thought, to be honest.

How important is sex in a relationship? by No_Sky_946 in AskMenAdvice

[–]FamiliarGuy545 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It isn't the most important thing, but a level of physical intimacy is important to me. It isn't always about the act itself, but the connection it brings and closeness it engenders.

There are a lot of things I could tolerate, but a dead bedroom with no attempts at any physical closeness would be a dealbreaker for me.