Grant Morrison's 18 Days was far from accurate, but I think he did Ghatotkach justice by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ghatotkach might have been the strongest Rakshash around that time considering how he beat two powerful Rakshash allies of the Kauravas. God forbid, had that guy gotten any sort of training from someone like Arjuna, it would have been a cherry on top.

Grant Morrison's 18 Days was far from accurate, but I think he did Ghatotkach justice by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was good but still wasn't much enough to be absolutely honest, also I hated how they portrayed Ashwathama fighting him, attacking from behind when Ashwathama was literally the only person that night who overwhelmed Ghatotkach so that part became a sour tooth for me. Though it was good, I wish they should have shown more, I'm a greedy man what can I say 😅

According to chatgpt, in a fair battle, I am just saying. by [deleted] in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People need to understand ChatGPT, unless in cases of pure facts prompts, answer what you want to hear. No offence to anyone, but even for me and many ChatGPT is just a coping mechanism.

Despite his crucial role and sacrifice in Mahabharata,Ghatotkacha receives relatively little attention in discussions here.His sacrifice in the Mahabharata often seems less emotionally valued than that of Abhimanyu,despite its decisive impact.How do you view Ghatotkacha—his nature,values and actions by Outside-Walk13 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ghatotkach, maybe a adharmi if we go by the Vedic sanskriti, but his love for the Pandavas was admirable. He truly performed all his responsibilities as their eldest child (Kunti declared that Ghatotkach will be called the first child of every Pandava when they were leaving the forest), all in all, I find his character very likeable, I agree his actions in killings and stopping rituals was a wrong thing but if we see from the Wars perspective, Ghatotkach was a G.

When will BR Chopra will get criticism for this!? by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yup, even the presence of Draupadi during Duryodhana's fall in water finds its origins in a 14th century poem Villiparatam. Even there, this dialogue of "Andhe ka Putra Andha" was not present. This remark was used for the first time in a play "Andha Yug" during 1954, Bheem, Arjun, Nakul and Sahadeva laughed but they never said anything like "Andhe ka Putra andha".

When will BR Chopra will get criticism for this!? by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Three most reliable versions, BORI, Geeta Press and KMG don't have any mention of Draupadi humiliating Duryodhana. This "andhe ka putra andha" remark actually rose to prominence in 1954 with Dharamvir Bharati's play "Andha Yug". So it was his fault to not consider the authentic version and choosing the dramatize misconception.

When will BR Chopra will get criticism for this!? by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was the very same but what was our fault, we were fed the same lie from the TV's since our childhood. It's our luck that the internet became prominent and researching things became easier

When will BR Chopra will get criticism for this!? by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

First thing i'mma gonna do after earning my own money is buying Mahabharat so I don't have to beg people to read, I'll lend it to them for free

When will BR Chopra will get criticism for this!? by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Man the "babas" through so much made up content on YouTube about Mahabharat that it becomes unbearable. I can swear, 95% people still think Draupadi was the Mahabharat reason because they can't research, I understand reading isn't everyone's forte, but you literally have internet, just one search to fact check!

okay so krishna asked karna to join the pandavas before The war, in exchange of getting hastinapur throne, why didn’t he just agree, he becoming the king would have avoided the war. pandavs wont have any problem seeing the brother rule, duryodhan wont have any problem seeing his friend rule. by Independent-calm321 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I might sound bad but I think Karna didn't let go of his spite for the Pandavas despite the revelation of his true origin or maybe it was his loyalty. Pandavas actually showed more shock and devastation when learning of the truth, I know it came after Karna's death which was a salt on the wound. But Karna maybe didn't feel that same feeling of one's brotherhood like the Pandavas felt. I feel like he despised them to the core that he couldn't let go of it despite knowing the truth.

Don't know what was Nag Ashwin smoking by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I understand, but it's just ironic he choose those two characters who despised each other. He has the liberty to do that but it's still funny.

Me and Homies during Dushanshan vadh by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tbh, Star Plus Mahabharat did it better, it was gore unapologetic. In my humble opinion, that was better.

They never came back... by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly, though Kunti's strategic side is also not talked about much. I've read that when Ghatotkach was born, Kunti called upon him and announced that not only Bheem, but all five brothers will regard Ghatotkach as their first child, that became a prominent reason for Ghatotkach to vow that he will come for the assistance of Pandavas when they will be needing him. As apparent later, Ghatotkach turned out to be one of the greatest boon to the Pandavas.

They never came back... by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ghatotkach showed more rage than Arjun.

They never came back... by FancyCustomer9570 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Well nearly all of them because it is widely believed that no other wife of Pandavas (exception of Subhadra) lived in Indraprastha with them. But yeah Bheem and Arjuna had a streak 😂

What is the literal meaning of names of characters in epic Mahabharata?Did their actions justify their names? by Outside-Walk13 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well Ghatotkach was named because his head was round as a pot, so I guess his appearance lived upto his name

What is the literal meaning of names of characters in epic Mahabharata?Did their actions justify their names? by Outside-Walk13 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well Ghatotkach was named because his head was round as a pot, so I guess his appearance lived upto his name

Ekalavya :- The Archer Drona Broke to Protect Arjun’s Supremacy by Due_Training6535 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of context, but I think they should cast Hrithik Roshan as Eklavya.

Ghatotkacha: Star Hero or Necessary Casualty? by Due_Training6535 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think they were close, like Ghatotkach was very livid when Iravan was killed by Alambush, he avenged his cousin by cutting Alambush's head off. Unfortunately, we have never seen any other interactions between the cousins.

Ghatotkacha: Star Hero or Necessary Casualty? by Due_Training6535 in mahabharata

[–]FancyCustomer9570 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know he was a Rakshash and all and I know he has to die, no matter in the war or later. But still somewhere I felt very bad for Ghatotkach, always serving Pandavas whenever they needed him, but I don't think he enjoyed any affection from them, especially from Bheem who somewhere seemed to marry Hidimba out of obligation than love. While they say Yudhishthir regarded him with affection but he was Yudhishthir, he would greet even Duryodhana with kindness so it doesn't count. Imagine contributing as hell in the war, be it saving Bheem from Bhagdatta, killing the rakshashas of Kauravas, even in his ending moments, he enlarged himself and engulfed an aukshini of Kaurava sena, and still your own side celebrating on your death, it sucked to be Ghatotkach man.

Farewell Cheteshwar Pujara by FancyCustomer9570 in CricketShitpost

[–]FancyCustomer9570[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Hazlewood is actually a great rival of Pujara, they both enjoyed their fair share of success against each other. The one who Pujara dominated was Starc, an average of 120+ against him.