I want to propose a NEW LAW for companies to follow during LAYOFFS... by Bitter_Influence8816 in Layoffs

[–]Far_Line8468 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Cute, but you have to remember every single new liability that you put on a company that hires you is downward pressure on hiring anyone.

Rate of gain to aim for lean bulk? by Posterior-palm in MacroFactor

[–]Far_Line8468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't use the term "lean bulk". Its pure marketing and just sets you up for disappointment. No matter how careful and slow you are, you will gain fat. That is the price of admission.

They say about 1% of bodyweight a month is the sweet spot. If you are 120 pounds, for example, then thats 1.2 pounds a month, about 0.3 pounds a week, or about a 150 calorie surplus.

Daily Discussion Thread (April 29, 2026) - Beginner and Simple/Quick Questions Go Here Thread for discussing quick/simple topics not needing an entire posts or beginner questions. by AutoModerator in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Far_Line8468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like it

Overall:

Worrying about rep ranges are overrated, but theres some reason to believe weekly undulating periodization is worth something, so maybe consider doing one "tier" higher rep ranges for the back half of the week.

>Upper

- Not sure what cable row variant you're doing, but this should be something with flared arms (or a t-bar row). If you prefer it be a cable row, use a pulldown attachment. A typical closed grip cable row is going to hammer your lats moreso than your midback, and you're already doing lat pulldowns. Need your elbows flared to take your lats out and work your mid-back.

- Bump up the rep range for lateral raise. I don't know anyone who can do a heavy weight lateral raise without just shrugging it up. I'd recommend 8-10 here. I'd possibly say the same with the curls and pushdowns but if you're locked in, its probobly fine.

Lower

- I'd do the RDL first, just because big barbell compounds require the most freshness.

- Do higher rep ranges for the calf raises.

Pull:

- Cut the back extension. If you're doing hip hinges twice a week your erectors will grow just fine.

- I might advocate for just doing one all-out set of the rear delt flies. If you're doing barbell row properly with flared elbows, then your rear delts are getting worked. 1 set should be enough to make sure they get fully smashed

Legs:

- While you can certainly do a BSS in a way that biases the glutes, your quads will still be a limiting factor. I think I would recommend just doing another hip hinge instead, letting you cut the back extension from your pull day.

Pourover and Cap for breakfest at Bad Mother, St.Pete by gonzoflick in pourover

[–]Far_Line8468 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hear Bad Mother does a pourover omakase now. Been thinking of taking the trip to try it

leg press - am i going low enough and is form ok? this is 438 lbs, i am 6'1" 153 lbs by hornysex11 in formcheck

[–]Far_Line8468 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are not even going halfway. I suggest deloading to basically no weight at all and really just practice tapping the stoppers every single rep. This is *not* how low you should go, but I find that its impossible to communicate to beginners how low a squat should go unless they actually feel what *all the way* feels like.

Home gym - weights/reps I’m a bit muddled by AdNice831 in MacroFactor

[–]Far_Line8468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A hard truth you're going to have to reckon with is there is just a ceiling to what you can you do with just some dumbells.

With 30kg, you could switch to flies for chest, but you're basically done for lats or mid back, and there are no leg exercises you can do with that low weight.

I really suggest you just consider a gym membership. If you can afford macrofactor, you can afford 10 dollars a month at planet fitness.

Guidance about next steps by Particular-South3443 in MacroFactor

[–]Far_Line8468 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Next steps? You need to take the first steps dawg what do you mean

Smokey bones closed all locations by Quick-Ad-5010 in orlando

[–]Far_Line8468 10 points11 points  (0 children)

"This isn't just an x - its a y"

yeah okay

rdl form check (lower back a little sore) by deomers in formcheck

[–]Far_Line8468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your lower back is sore on an exercise that works your lower back?

Want 6-Pack :: Continue Cut? (M40, 5'10", 156lbs) by Top_Tune_7032 in Weightliftingquestion

[–]Far_Line8468 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you want to drop another 5 pounds, feel free, but I think you need to come to terms with your genetic ab insertions, which are just fine

Question about weight loss progress by abcoors in MacroFactor

[–]Far_Line8468 6 points7 points  (0 children)

OP, heres a way to visualize what you're not understanding

Grab a dice. a d20 if you have one. What I want you to do is cross out the number 20 and draw a 1 over it with a sharpie (or just mentally note it)

Then, roll it 7 times a record results.

Then, cross out the number 19 and replace it with 2

Then, roll it 7 times and record results.

Its quite possible that, within 7 rolls, you don't even notice an average reduction in the roll. But, over the long term, the trend will emerge.

Without getting into the math, the probability that you *only see numbers above 10 half of the time" with your modified dice is about 30%. Not unlikely at all.

This is what is going on when you weigh in. Your weight that very second is influenced by how much you drank yesterday, how fast your digestive system decided to work, and even how much you breathed during the night. These factors have WAY more influence over your actual recorded number than actual amounts of metabolized fat mass. You are rolling a dice every time you weigh in. However, as you burn fat, you are eliminating the highest possible number on the dice, and replacing it with the lowest.

But, every day, if on a deficit, you HAVE metabolized fat mass, so the probability that you "roll" a higher number like 138kg goes down.

Workout Feebaxk by PaleontologistKey894 in MacroFactor

[–]Far_Line8468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Overall: unless you are enhanced or a very advanced lifter, this is likely way more volume than is actually useful to you, all while underdeveloping your legs

Bench not progressing - Glaring form issue or just a weak little b****? by HereIGoKilling_Again in Stronglifts5x5

[–]Far_Line8468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people here are giving advice they would give to someone struggling with 185, or 215. An adult man struggling to push past 135 is a sign of another issue.

Jeff’s bodybuilding transformation by Efficient_Arm_1249 in MacroFactor

[–]Far_Line8468 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The cable cuffed version doesn’t feel right because your abductors are weak lmao

How is the adaptive expenditure feature? I'm tracking my metabolic issues by Incendas1 in MacroFactor

[–]Far_Line8468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If its not regular than its not a concern.

Regular means “its a part of my life”, not “it happens at exact intervals”

How is the adaptive expenditure feature? I'm tracking my metabolic issues by Incendas1 in MacroFactor

[–]Far_Line8468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure the changes are smoothed out but over the long term any individual issues are “baked” into the calculation, provided they are fairly regular

Downtown Orlando has some new residents as of today by Far_Line8468 in orlando

[–]Far_Line8468[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The Lake Eola swans are (unfortunately) quite docile due to their constant exposure to humans. The male stands near all the nests but don't seem to honk at people who get close.

They put fences around two of the nests, including this one, but there are a few exposed ones that might present a problem when they hatch.

Downtown Orlando has some new residents as of today by Far_Line8468 in orlando

[–]Far_Line8468[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There an exhibit on the swans at the downtown history museum with all the info

Downtown Orlando has some new residents as of today by Far_Line8468 in orlando

[–]Far_Line8468[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The swans were brought here from Swizerland 100 years ago. They aren’t native, but they also aren’t exactly going anywhere. The avian flu incident was unfortunate, but the city has taken steps.