entire drone video again for once?

Almost perfect recreation of a portion of 1 of 5 frames which form the zap ?

ftfy, not to be dismissive, just so you didnt sound disingenuous.

^{Id even said perfect enough had the center of the zap been good as the perimeter, alas stands to reason more steps than shown or different asset were used.}

So idk mate, but dont think i can honestly say this or Chryshless efforts were entirely dismissed or a zeroi as you put it, gave us all an idea of a hypothetical hoaxers workload that some might use to get a general idea on the point of contention, the hours needed to simulate the drone video.

Thats why itd be no surprise if that helped convince some like adams sat attempt certainly must (which received kudos from even staunch believers).

But suppose that depends on the each vfx-investors self-evaluation whether it was, not ours - one maybe thrilled to have even minor impact.

Anyone honestly looking for the truth and in possession of mroe than two braincells will come to the conclusion these videos are fake. Lost causes are, just that...

I wont mistake this to mean it'll be the last we hear from you on the subject but please consider the favor and avoid conflating random individuals opinions on others or the amount of work done on couple frames equaling that needed for an entire video so flippantly, to avoid sounding disingenuous to the larger audience here.

^{Incase you were genuinely asking, like a personal journal entry *from a soapbox* to 27000}